Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add zgbrenner/agentcounsel --skill coverage-issue-spottergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/zgbrenner/agentcounselWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/zgbrenner/agentcounsel/coverage-issue-spotter)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/zgbrenner/agentcounsel/coverage-issue-spotter"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/zgbrenner/agentcounsel/coverage-issue-spotter/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/zgbrenner/agentcounsel/coverage-issue-spotter"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/zgbrenner/agentcounsel/coverage-issue-spotter.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00040 | $0.01756 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00020 | $0.00878 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00008 | $0.00351 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00176 |
Grade A, and why
Coverage Issue Spotter scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 114 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Coverage Issue Spotter
Purpose
Issue-spot the insurance coverage questions raised by a policy and a claim — from the policy, claim facts, tender, pleadings, demand letters, denial letters, and correspondence — into a source-cited coverage issue matrix for attorney review. This skill identifies the questions a coverage attorney must work through; it answers none of them and determines no coverage outcome.
Use When
- A coverage question must be triaged before substantive attorney analysis.
- A claim, tender, or denial needs the coverage issues mapped against the policy.
- Counsel needs a source-cited issue matrix with explicit missing facts and document requests.
Required Inputs
- The policy, the policy documents, or a completed
insurance-policy-summary, with source references. - The claim facts as provided, and any tender, pleadings, demand letters, denial letters, reservation of rights, or correspondence.
- The policy type (CGL, property, professional, D&O, auto, umbrella/excess, or other) — or
not provided. - The policy period and any claim dates, echoed and marked
[deadline verification required]. - The user's role (insurer, insured, additional insured, claimant, broker, or other) — or
not provided. - The claim type and claim stage (notice, investigation, defense, suit, appraisal, denial, coverage dispute) — or
not provided. - Jurisdiction and governing law, or
[verify jurisdiction].
If the policy, the claim facts, the policy type, or the role is missing, record it as not provided and return the missing-information list first.
Do Not Use When
- The request is to decide whether the claim is covered, or whether the insurer must defend or indemnify.
- The request is to conclude on an exclusion, endorsement, additional insured status, allocation, other-insurance priority, late notice, waiver, estoppel, or prejudice.
- The request is for a coverage opinion, a denial, or legal advice.
- The task is to draft a coverage position (use
coverage-position-outline).
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 114 lines · 40 tokens per session scan A 947ca26e52b8
Coverage Issue Spotter is a skill published in the GitHub repository zgbrenner/agentcounsel (19 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 40 tokens to every session and 1,756 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
cyber-law-compliance-summary
Produces structured cyber law compliance memoranda covering GDPR, CCPA, state privacy laws, and sector-specific regulations for US and EU operations. Includes Bluebook citations, jurisdiction comparison tables, penalty exposure, and regulatory trends. Use when advising on digital operations compliance, privacy program…
cross-check-legal-advice
Use AI for legal issue-spotting, plain-language clause explanations, and questions to verify with licensed counsel.
legal-interpretation
Analyze legal documents (statutes, contracts, constitutions, treaties, and regulatory texts) using a cross-jurisdictional framework of legal interpretation.
legal-research
A legal research skill for finding and analysing laws and court cases, including similar cases. It requires access to a reliable legal research database before producing a formal report.
document-fill
A document-filling assistant that uses a supplied template and case files to fill in forms, contracts, or legal documents. It also reports where each filled value came from and which details are missing.
contract-review
A contract-review workflow for agreements governed by Chinese law, United States law, or both. It examines clauses one by one and produces a list of legal-risk questions, with an optional marked-up Word document.