Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add zgbrenner/agentcounsel --skill creditor-claim-intakegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/zgbrenner/agentcounselWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/zgbrenner/agentcounsel/creditor-claim-intake)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/zgbrenner/agentcounsel/creditor-claim-intake"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/zgbrenner/agentcounsel/creditor-claim-intake/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/zgbrenner/agentcounsel/creditor-claim-intake"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/zgbrenner/agentcounsel/creditor-claim-intake.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00031 | $0.03022 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00015 | $0.01511 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00604 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00302 |
Grade A, and why
Creditor Claim Intake scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 259 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Creditor Claim Intake
Purpose
Organize a creditor's facts and documents for a potential bankruptcy claim into a structured, source-cited claim facts table — with a document request list, missing facts, dispute flags, and verification questions — so a qualified attorney can evaluate the claim. This skill organizes facts; it determines no claim validity, priority, allowance, or secured status. It produces draft legal work product for attorney review — not legal advice.
Use When
- A creditor's claim facts must be organized before an attorney evaluates the claim or a proof of claim is considered.
- A team needs the contract or invoice basis, amounts, collateral, and disputes captured with sources and gaps flagged.
- A bankruptcy matter requires the creditor's position scoped before substantive analysis.
Required Inputs
- Debtor and creditor identities, and the user's party role.
- The basis of the claim — contracts, invoices, notes, judgments, or other — with source references.
- The claim amount as stated by the user (recorded as a user-stated figure, never computed or verified).
- Any secured, unsecured, or priority characterization the user provides (recorded as an assertion, never confirmed).
- Collateral facts, guaranties, offsets or setoffs, and payment history.
- Disputes, defenses raised, and notices received.
- Proof-of-claim status (filed, not filed,
unknown), and any user-supplied bar date marked[deadline verification required]. - Source documents with citations to invoices, contract clauses, or pages.
If the debtor, the creditor's role, or the basis of the claim is missing,
record it as not provided and return the missing-information list first.
Do Not Use When
- The request is to determine whether the claim is valid, allowed, secured, or entitled to priority.
- The request is to compute the claim amount, interest, or a bar date.
- The request is for legal advice or a recommendation on filing.
Also out of scope (this skill does not): determine whether a claim is valid, allowable, secured, or entitled to priority; determine claim amount; advise on filing a claim; calculate a bar date; or constitute legal advice.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 259 lines · 31 tokens per session scan A 6a56ccbf411b
Creditor Claim Intake is a skill published in the GitHub repository zgbrenner/agentcounsel (19 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 31 tokens to every session and 3,022 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
legal-research
A legal research skill for finding and analysing laws and court cases, including similar cases. It requires access to a reliable legal research database before producing a formal report.
document-fill
A document-filling assistant that uses a supplied template and case files to fill in forms, contracts, or legal documents. It also reports where each filled value came from and which details are missing.
contract-review
A contract-review workflow for agreements governed by Chinese law, United States law, or both. It examines clauses one by one and produces a list of legal-risk questions, with an optional marked-up Word document.
fedramp
Expert guidance for FedRAMP certification and compliance under CR26 (FedRAMP Consolidated Rules for 2026). Use this skill whenever a user asks about FedRAMP authorization, ATO (Authority to Operate), cloud security for federal government, NIST SP 800-53 controls, CSP compliance, or any of the core FedRAMP document…
eu-cra
Expert EU Cyber Resilience Act (CRA) advisor for Regulation (EU) 2024/2847 — mandatory cybersecurity and vulnerability handling requirements for all products with digital elements (PDEs) sold in the EU. Use this skill for gap analysis, product classification (Default / Class I / Class II), conformity assessment route…
aenderungsvorbehalt-308
Für Änderungsvorbehalt 308: ordnet Norm, Beweislast und Gegenargument; Ergebnis: Prüfprodukt mit Risiko und nächstem Schritt.