Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add zgbrenner/agentcounsel --skill custody-order-review-checklistgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/zgbrenner/agentcounselWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/zgbrenner/agentcounsel/custody-order-review-checklist)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/zgbrenner/agentcounsel/custody-order-review-checklist"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/zgbrenner/agentcounsel/custody-order-review-checklist/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/zgbrenner/agentcounsel/custody-order-review-checklist"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/zgbrenner/agentcounsel/custody-order-review-checklist.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00037 | $0.02196 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00018 | $0.01098 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00007 | $0.00439 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00220 |
Grade A, and why
Custody Order Review Checklist scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 113 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Custody Order Review Checklist
Purpose
Review an existing or proposed custody or parenting order specifically — not a full marital settlement agreement — for clarity and day-to-day administration issues, covering legal and physical custody language, the parenting schedule, holidays, exchanges, travel, communication, school and medical decisions, relocation and travel notices, dispute resolution, enforcement and ambiguity points, and any safety provisions, and produce an order-clarity checklist, an ambiguity table, and a missing-details list, so a qualified, licensed attorney has an organized review. This skill checks whether the order is clear and administrable; it recommends no custody outcome and decides no enforceability question. It draws on the custody-and-parenting, safety, and schedule-consistency patterns in skills/family-law/references/issue-catalog.md. Where the document is a broader settlement agreement spanning support, property, tax, and enforceability alongside custody, use settlement-agreement-issue-spotter instead for a single cross-issue review.
Use When
- An existing or proposed custody or parenting order is the whole subject of the review and must be checked for clarity and administrability.
- The review is scoped to custody and parenting terms alone, standing apart from any broader settlement agreement.
- An attorney wants the ambiguities, gaps, and enforcement-friction points in an order surfaced.
- A proposed order must be reviewed for missing administration details before it is finalized.
Required Inputs
- The full existing or proposed custody or parenting order text (uploaded or pasted). Do not review from a description alone.
- The parties, their roles, the children involved, and whether the order is existing or proposed — or
not provided. - The jurisdiction and governing law — or
not provided, flagged[verify jurisdiction]. - The case stage and the purpose of the review (clarity check, modification preparation, enforcement preparation, or other) — or
not provided. - Any related orders or agreements the user provides, with source references — or
not provided.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 113 lines · 37 tokens per session scan A 42450468bada
Custody Order Review Checklist is a skill published in the GitHub repository zgbrenner/agentcounsel (19 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 37 tokens to every session and 2,196 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
legal-research
A legal research skill for finding and analysing laws and court cases, including similar cases. It requires access to a reliable legal research database before producing a formal report.
document-fill
A document-filling assistant that uses a supplied template and case files to fill in forms, contracts, or legal documents. It also reports where each filled value came from and which details are missing.
contract-review
A contract-review workflow for agreements governed by Chinese law, United States law, or both. It examines clauses one by one and produces a list of legal-risk questions, with an optional marked-up Word document.
fedramp
Expert guidance for FedRAMP certification and compliance under CR26 (FedRAMP Consolidated Rules for 2026). Use this skill whenever a user asks about FedRAMP authorization, ATO (Authority to Operate), cloud security for federal government, NIST SP 800-53 controls, CSP compliance, or any of the core FedRAMP document…
eu-cra
Expert EU Cyber Resilience Act (CRA) advisor for Regulation (EU) 2024/2847 — mandatory cybersecurity and vulnerability handling requirements for all products with digital elements (PDEs) sold in the EU. Use this skill for gap analysis, product classification (Default / Class I / Class II), conformity assessment route…
aenderungsvorbehalt-308
Für Änderungsvorbehalt 308: ordnet Norm, Beweislast und Gegenargument; Ergebnis: Prüfprodukt mit Risiko und nächstem Schritt.