Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add zgbrenner/agentcounsel --skill dmca-takedowngit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/zgbrenner/agentcounselWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/zgbrenner/agentcounsel/dmca-takedown)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/zgbrenner/agentcounsel/dmca-takedown"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/zgbrenner/agentcounsel/dmca-takedown/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/zgbrenner/agentcounsel/dmca-takedown"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/zgbrenner/agentcounsel/dmca-takedown.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00041 | $0.02598 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00020 | $0.01299 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00008 | $0.00520 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00260 |
Grade A, and why
DMCA Takedown scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 150 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
DMCA Takedown
Purpose
Produce a structured draft notice or counter-notice under the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) notice-and-takedown framework, or evaluate a notice received against the user's content. This skill operates in two modes:
- Mode A — Preparing a Takedown Notice: the user owns or controls a copyright and wants to notify a platform or host to remove allegedly infringing content.
- Mode B — Evaluating a Received Notice and Considering a Counter-Notice: the user has received a takedown notice and wants to understand it and assess whether a counter-notice is appropriate.
This is draft legal work product for attorney review. It is NOT legal advice. Sending a takedown notice or counter-notice has legal consequences; counsel should review before any notice is submitted.
Use When
- A user says "someone is using my [image/video/code/article] without permission" and wants to have it removed from a platform.
- A user wants to draft a DMCA notice to send to a hosting provider, platform, or ISP.
- A user has received a takedown notice and wants to understand what it means or whether to file a counter-notice.
- A user asks whether they have a copyright claim against content appearing online.
- A user needs to understand the required elements of a valid DMCA notice or counter-notice.
Required Inputs
For Mode A (Preparing a Takedown Notice):
- Description of the copyrighted work (title, type, date of creation or publication, and where the original can be found).
- The user's ownership or authorization basis (original author, rights holder, authorized agent — specify which).
- The URL or specific location of the allegedly infringing material.
- The platform or service provider receiving the notice, and its designated DMCA agent contact if known.
- The user's contact information (name, address, email, phone) for inclusion in the notice.
For Mode B (Evaluating a Received Notice):
- The full text of the received takedown notice.
- The user's description of the content that was taken down or flagged.
- The user's basis for believing the content is lawful (ownership, license, fair use, other).
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 150 lines · 41 tokens per session scan A 094c8322f066
DMCA Takedown is a skill published in the GitHub repository zgbrenner/agentcounsel (19 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 41 tokens to every session and 2,598 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
seedance-copyright
This skill should be used when a Seedance 2.0 prompt mentions named characters, franchises, studios, celebrities, public figures, private people, brand logos, copyrighted scenes, songs, voices, or real-person likeness workflows and needs an IP-safe rewrite.
copyright-holder-finder
Produces a step-by-step research plan for identifying the copyright holder of a specific piece of content — image, footage, text, music, or other media — tailored to the content type and jurisdiction.
licensing-brief-writer
Writes a brief summarising the licensing requirements for using a specific piece of music, archive footage, photograph, or other third-party content in a media project — including what licences are needed, who to approach, and what terms to request.
legal-research
A legal research skill for finding and analysing laws and court cases, including similar cases. It requires access to a reliable legal research database before producing a formal report.
document-fill
A document-filling assistant that uses a supplied template and case files to fill in forms, contracts, or legal documents. It also reports where each filled value came from and which details are missing.
contract-review
A contract-review workflow for agreements governed by Chinese law, United States law, or both. It examines clauses one by one and produces a list of legal-risk questions, with an optional marked-up Word document.