Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add zgbrenner/agentcounsel --skill equity-incentive-plan-reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/zgbrenner/agentcounselWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/zgbrenner/agentcounsel/equity-incentive-plan-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/zgbrenner/agentcounsel/equity-incentive-plan-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/zgbrenner/agentcounsel/equity-incentive-plan-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/zgbrenner/agentcounsel/equity-incentive-plan-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/zgbrenner/agentcounsel/equity-incentive-plan-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00090 | $0.03065 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00045 | $0.01533 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00018 | $0.00613 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00307 |
Grade A, and why
Equity Incentive Plan Review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 132 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Equity Incentive Plan Review
Purpose
Produce a structured, attorney-ready review of an equity incentive plan and its award agreements — options, restricted stock units, restricted stock, phantom units, or stock appreciation rights. The skill records the plan-capacity and share-counting provisions verbatim, maps the vesting and termination-treatment matrices as drafted, organizes the securities-law and governance-approval hooks as questions, and flags the tax hooks for tax counsel. It never computes the available share pool, dilution, or any vesting outcome; never determines that a securities exemption is available; and never asserts tax treatment. This produces draft work product for a qualified, licensed securities attorney to review — not legal, tax, or investment advice.
Use When
- A company is adopting or amending an equity incentive plan and wants the plan and award forms reviewed before board or shareholder approval.
- Award agreement forms (option, RSU, restricted stock, phantom, SAR) need their vesting, termination, and change-in-control terms mapped against the plan.
- A plan's share-counting, evergreen, or fungible-share provisions need to be recorded and their questions surfaced.
- The securities-law posture of award issuances needs to be organized as questions before grants are made.
- A plan-versus-award-agreement consistency check is needed before a grant cycle.
Required Inputs
- The equity incentive plan document, in full. If only award agreements are provided, note the plan as a gap; if only the plan is provided, note the award forms as a gap.
- The award agreement form(s) or specific award(s) to review, and the award type(s) involved.
- The issuer context: entity type, public or private status, and the plan's stated purpose. Public/private status changes the securities and disclosure posture materially.
- Optional: the board/committee charter and any prior plan or amendment history — for the governance-approval and share-counting analysis.
- Optional: capitalization context relevant to the share-counting provisions (recorded as context, never used to compute an available pool).
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 132 lines · 90 tokens per session scan A 5409e814ed82
Equity Incentive Plan Review is a skill published in the GitHub repository zgbrenner/agentcounsel (19 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 90 tokens to every session and 3,065 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
newsroom-ai-policy
Generate a newsroom AI usage policy: where AI is allowed, where it is banned, disclosure rules, quality gates, and accountability structures — tailored to the publication's editorial values.
legal-research
A legal research skill for finding and analysing laws and court cases, including similar cases. It requires access to a reliable legal research database before producing a formal report.
document-fill
A document-filling assistant that uses a supplied template and case files to fill in forms, contracts, or legal documents. It also reports where each filled value came from and which details are missing.
contract-review
A contract-review workflow for agreements governed by Chinese law, United States law, or both. It examines clauses one by one and produces a list of legal-risk questions, with an optional marked-up Word document.
analise-juridica-br
Skill para análise estruturada de contratos brasileiros como apoio a advogado. Acionar quando usuário pedir para "analisar contrato", "revisar cláusulas", "due diligence contratual" ou similar, em contexto de Direito brasileiro. NÃO emite parecer jurídico — produz insumo qualificado para advogado.
achieving-cmmc-level-2-compliance
Prepare a defense-contractor environment for CMMC Level 2 certification: scope CUI and FCI, implement the 110 NIST SP 800-171 Rev 2 security requirements across 14 families, compute the SPRS score with the DoD Assessment Methodology, manage a compliant POA&M, and ready the organization for a C3PAO assessment. Use when…