Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add zgbrenner/agentcounsel --skill hearing-prep-checklistgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/zgbrenner/agentcounselWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/zgbrenner/agentcounsel/hearing-prep-checklist)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/zgbrenner/agentcounsel/hearing-prep-checklist"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/zgbrenner/agentcounsel/hearing-prep-checklist/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/zgbrenner/agentcounsel/hearing-prep-checklist"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/zgbrenner/agentcounsel/hearing-prep-checklist.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00039 | $0.01679 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00019 | $0.00839 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00008 | $0.00336 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00168 |
Grade A, and why
Family Law Hearing Prep Checklist scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 106 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Family Law Hearing Prep Checklist
Purpose
Build a hearing-preparation checklist for a family law hearing — pleadings, declarations, exhibits, financial disclosures, witnesses, prior orders, service and proof documents, the issues to be heard, and the requested relief as the user supplies it — so a qualified, licensed attorney has an organized preparation list. This skill organizes preparation tasks; it invents no court deadlines or local rules and sets no hearing strategy.
Use When
- A family law hearing is approaching and the preparation tasks must be organized into a checklist for an attorney.
- An attorney needs a status view of the pleadings, declarations, exhibits, disclosures, and witnesses for a hearing.
- Open questions for counsel must be collected before a hearing.
Required Inputs
- The hearing type and the issues to be heard as the user states them — or
not provided. - The pleadings, declarations, exhibits, financial disclosures, and prior orders available, with source references — or
not provided. - The witness list, the service and proof-of-service documents, and the requested relief as the user supplies it — or
not provided. - Any deadlines the user supplies, echoed verbatim and marked
[deadline verification required]— ornot provided. - The parties, their roles, the case stage, and the jurisdiction — or
not provided, jurisdiction flagged[verify jurisdiction].
If the hearing type, the issues to be heard, or the parties is missing, record it as not provided and return the missing-information list first.
Do Not Use When
- The request is to compute or supply a court deadline, a filing requirement, or a local rule.
- The request is for a hearing strategy, an argument, an order of proof, or an outcome prediction.
- The request is to draft pleadings, declarations, or court forms, or to decide what relief to request.
- The request is for legal advice.
Also out of scope (this skill does not): invent court deadlines, filing requirements, local rules, or procedures; set a hearing strategy, an argument, or an order of proof; predict an outcome; decide what relief to request or what evidence is admissible; draft pleadings, declarations, or court forms; or constitute legal advice.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 106 lines · 39 tokens per session scan A 4239ac1165ae
Family Law Hearing Prep Checklist is a skill published in the GitHub repository zgbrenner/agentcounsel (19 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 39 tokens to every session and 1,679 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
legal-research
A legal research skill for finding and analysing laws and court cases, including similar cases. It requires access to a reliable legal research database before producing a formal report.
document-fill
A document-filling assistant that uses a supplied template and case files to fill in forms, contracts, or legal documents. It also reports where each filled value came from and which details are missing.
contract-review
A contract-review workflow for agreements governed by Chinese law, United States law, or both. It examines clauses one by one and produces a list of legal-risk questions, with an optional marked-up Word document.
fedramp
Expert guidance for FedRAMP certification and compliance under CR26 (FedRAMP Consolidated Rules for 2026). Use this skill whenever a user asks about FedRAMP authorization, ATO (Authority to Operate), cloud security for federal government, NIST SP 800-53 controls, CSP compliance, or any of the core FedRAMP document…
eu-cra
Expert EU Cyber Resilience Act (CRA) advisor for Regulation (EU) 2024/2847 — mandatory cybersecurity and vulnerability handling requirements for all products with digital elements (PDEs) sold in the EU. Use this skill for gap analysis, product classification (Default / Class I / Class II), conformity assessment route…
aenderungsvorbehalt-308
Für Änderungsvorbehalt 308: ordnet Norm, Beweislast und Gegenargument; Ergebnis: Prüfprodukt mit Risiko und nächstem Schritt.