Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add zgbrenner/agentcounsel --skill loi-term-sheet-reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/zgbrenner/agentcounselWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/zgbrenner/agentcounsel/loi-term-sheet-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/zgbrenner/agentcounsel/loi-term-sheet-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/zgbrenner/agentcounsel/loi-term-sheet-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/zgbrenner/agentcounsel/loi-term-sheet-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/zgbrenner/agentcounsel/loi-term-sheet-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00049 | $0.02286 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00024 | $0.01143 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00010 | $0.00457 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00229 |
Grade A, and why
LOI and Term Sheet Review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 195 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
LOI and Term Sheet Review
Purpose
Review a letter of intent (LOI), term sheet, or indication of interest (IOI) for a merger, acquisition, or strategic investment, and surface — from a stated side of the deal — the deal terms it sets, how it characterizes each provision as binding or non-binding, the issues worth negotiating, and the terms it leaves open.
This skill produces draft work product for attorney review only. It is not legal advice and is not a final negotiating position. An LOI shapes the deal that follows; the definitive agreement, once negotiated, controls.
Use When
- A user asks to "review this LOI," "review this term sheet," "what should we push back on in this term sheet," or "is this IOI reasonable."
- A deal team needs a structured read of an LOI before signing it or countering.
- An LOI or term sheet must be summarized as the front end of an acquisition, merger, asset purchase, stock purchase, acqui-hire, roll-up, or strategic investment.
Required Inputs
- The LOI, term sheet, or IOI text — uploaded or pasted. Do not review from a description, a summary, or a partial excerpt.
- The deal type — for example a stock purchase, asset purchase, merger, membership-interest purchase, acqui-hire, roll-up, or minority investment.
- The side the review is for — buyer-side, seller-side, company-side, investor-side, or target-side.
- The transaction stage — for example pre-LOI negotiation, LOI countersign, or exclusivity period.
- Jurisdiction and governing law — as stated in the document, or flagged as unknown.
- Any related documents — a prior draft, an NDA, or a process letter — if they exist.
If the LOI or term sheet text is not provided, stop and request it. Do not review a document you have not been given.
Do Not Use When
- The document is a definitive acquisition agreement — use
purchase-agreement-issue-list. - The user needs a diligence request list — use
acquisition-diligence-request-list. - The user needs an analysis of indemnity and escrow mechanics — use
indemnity-escrow-risk-review. - The document is a commercial contract rather than a deal LOI — use
skills/contracts/contract-risk-review/SKILL.md. - The user wants a legal opinion on whether an LOI provision binds the parties — that requires an attorney.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 195 lines · 49 tokens per session scan A d12daad87f19
LOI and Term Sheet Review is a skill published in the GitHub repository zgbrenner/agentcounsel (19 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 49 tokens to every session and 2,286 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
legal-research
A legal research skill for finding and analysing laws and court cases, including similar cases. It requires access to a reliable legal research database before producing a formal report.
document-fill
A document-filling assistant that uses a supplied template and case files to fill in forms, contracts, or legal documents. It also reports where each filled value came from and which details are missing.
contract-review
A contract-review workflow for agreements governed by Chinese law, United States law, or both. It examines clauses one by one and produces a list of legal-risk questions, with an optional marked-up Word document.
fedramp
Expert guidance for FedRAMP certification and compliance under CR26 (FedRAMP Consolidated Rules for 2026). Use this skill whenever a user asks about FedRAMP authorization, ATO (Authority to Operate), cloud security for federal government, NIST SP 800-53 controls, CSP compliance, or any of the core FedRAMP document…
eu-cra
Expert EU Cyber Resilience Act (CRA) advisor for Regulation (EU) 2024/2847 — mandatory cybersecurity and vulnerability handling requirements for all products with digital elements (PDEs) sold in the EU. Use this skill for gap analysis, product classification (Default / Class I / Class II), conformity assessment route…
aenderungsvorbehalt-308
Für Änderungsvorbehalt 308: ordnet Norm, Beweislast und Gegenargument; Ergebnis: Prüfprodukt mit Risiko und nächstem Schritt.