Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add zgbrenner/agentcounsel --skill model-risk-triagegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/zgbrenner/agentcounselWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/zgbrenner/agentcounsel/model-risk-triage)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/zgbrenner/agentcounsel/model-risk-triage"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/zgbrenner/agentcounsel/model-risk-triage/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/zgbrenner/agentcounsel/model-risk-triage"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/zgbrenner/agentcounsel/model-risk-triage.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00042 | $0.02795 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00021 | $0.01398 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00008 | $0.00559 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00280 |
Grade A, and why
Model Risk Triage scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 172 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Model Risk Triage
Purpose
Produce a structured triage of the legal, governance, and operational risk dimensions of a specific AI model or AI system. The output is a risk register with ownership assignments and recommended controls — not a legal opinion on whether the model may be deployed. It equips attorneys and governance reviewers with the structured information they need to make deployment decisions.
This skill is model-level and technical in focus. It complements ai-use-case-intake (which covers the business use case) and ai-vendor-terms-review (which covers vendor contractual terms).
Use When
- Engineering, product, or legal teams need to assess a specific model before integration or deployment.
- A governance committee requires a pre-deployment risk assessment for an AI model.
- A model is being upgraded, retrained, or replaced and a delta risk assessment is needed.
- An audit, incident, or regulatory inquiry requires documentation of what risk assessment was performed before deployment.
- A user asks "what are the risks of using this model?" or "what do we need to have in place before we deploy this?"
Required Inputs
- Model identification: Name, version, provider or source (vendor API, open-source repository, internally trained), and a link to model documentation or model card if available.
- Intended use description: How the organization plans to use the model — inputs, outputs, and the decision or action outputs will inform or automate.
- Affected individuals: Who will be impacted by the model's outputs (employees, consumers, patients, job applicants, etc.) and the estimated population size or scope.
- Deployment context: The application, product, or system the model will be embedded in, and whether outputs will be directly user-facing.
- Available technical documentation: Model card, data sheet, evaluation reports, accuracy benchmarks, bias evaluation results — whatever is available. Note what is not available.
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 172 lines · 42 tokens per session scan A 30364c45c8a7
Model Risk Triage is a skill published in the GitHub repository zgbrenner/agentcounsel (19 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 42 tokens to every session and 2,795 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
policy
Define and enforce decision policies, compliance rules, and exceptions over Semantica graphs. Uses ContextGraph.checkdecisionrules/enforcedecisionpolicy and context.PolicyEngine.
813-regulations-iso-42001
Use when reviewing, designing, or modifying Java enterprise systems that use GenAI, LLMs, AI-assisted coding, RAG, AI agents, generated code, generated dependencies, prompt workflows, external model providers, or AI-enabled business logic and need ISO/IEC 42001 AI management system-aware engineering guidance. Part of…
801-regulations-eu-ai-act
Use when reviewing, designing, or modifying Java enterprise systems that use AI, LLMs, AI agents, RAG, tool calling, workflow automation, or model-based decision support and need EU AI Act regulatory awareness. This should trigger for requests such as Review a Java AI system for EU AI Act controls; Design governance…
ai-privacy-assessment
Guides the combined DPIA and AI Act conformity assessment for AI systems processing personal data. Covers EDPB-EDPS Joint Opinion 5/2021, training data lawfulness under Art. 6 and Art. 9, Art. 22 automated decision-making, algorithmic bias detection, and NIST AI RMF MAP function. Keywords: AI privacy, DPIA, AI Act…
runtime-admissibility-review
Determines whether a specific AI-agent action, output, recommendation, or proposed commitment remains admissible for execution or institutional reliance under current authority, delegated scope, evidence, facts, policy, risk, escalation, and revocation conditions. Use this Skill before an enterprise or regulated AI…
agent-authority-charter-builder-arkadiy-miteiko
Creates an Agent Authority Charter for enterprise or regulated AI agents before deployment. Use this Skill when a user needs to define what an AI agent is allowed to do, who delegated authority to it, what actions are permitted or prohibited, when human approval is required, what evidence must be preserved, and how…