Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add zgbrenner/agentcounsel --skill plan-disclosure-statement-issue-spottergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/zgbrenner/agentcounselWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/zgbrenner/agentcounsel/plan-disclosure-statement-issue-spotter)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/zgbrenner/agentcounsel/plan-disclosure-statement-issue-spotter"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/zgbrenner/agentcounsel/plan-disclosure-statement-issue-spotter/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/zgbrenner/agentcounsel/plan-disclosure-statement-issue-spotter"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/zgbrenner/agentcounsel/plan-disclosure-statement-issue-spotter.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00040 | $0.01530 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00020 | $0.00765 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00008 | $0.00306 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00153 |
Grade A, and why
Plan Disclosure Statement Issue Spotter scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 149 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Plan Disclosure Statement Issue Spotter
Purpose
Issue-spot a Chapter 11 plan and disclosure statement into a source-cited treatment table, an issue list, and a consistency-issues list, so a qualified attorney can evaluate the documents. This skill spots issues and organizes the provisions; it concludes nothing on confirmability, the adequacy of disclosure, priority compliance, or the voting outcome. It produces draft legal work product for attorney review — not legal advice.
Use When
- A plan and/or disclosure statement must be reviewed and its issues organized for an attorney.
- A creditor, committee, or party in interest needs the classification, treatment, and release provisions mapped with sources.
- A plan draft must be checked for internal consistency before objections or a vote are considered.
Required Inputs
- The plan and/or disclosure statement, with source references.
- The user's party role (debtor-side, creditor-side, committee-side, equity, or other).
- Class classification and treatment provisions, as written.
- Voting provisions, and releases, exculpation, and injunction provisions.
- Executory contract provisions and claims-reconciliation provisions.
- Feasibility facts and any liquidation analysis, if provided (recorded as provided, never assessed).
- Governance, equity treatment, and any stated objections or confirmation issues.
- Any plan, disclosure-statement, voting, or confirmation dates, echoed and
marked
[deadline verification required]. - Source references to plan or disclosure-statement sections, articles, or pages.
If the documents, the user's role, or the classification/treatment provisions
are missing, record them as not provided and return the missing-information
list first.
Do Not Use When
- The request is to conclude whether the plan is confirmable, whether disclosure is adequate, or whether the plan is feasible.
- The request is to conclude on priority compliance, the legal effect of releases, or the voting outcome.
- The request is for legal advice or a deadline calculation.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 149 lines · 40 tokens per session scan A 26a73b39d7d6
Plan Disclosure Statement Issue Spotter is a skill published in the GitHub repository zgbrenner/agentcounsel (19 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 40 tokens to every session and 1,530 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
cross-check-legal-advice
Use AI for legal issue-spotting, plain-language clause explanations, and questions to verify with licensed counsel.
legal-research
A legal research skill for finding and analysing laws and court cases, including similar cases. It requires access to a reliable legal research database before producing a formal report.
document-fill
A document-filling assistant that uses a supplied template and case files to fill in forms, contracts, or legal documents. It also reports where each filled value came from and which details are missing.
contract-review
A contract-review workflow for agreements governed by Chinese law, United States law, or both. It examines clauses one by one and produces a list of legal-risk questions, with an optional marked-up Word document.
fedramp
Expert guidance for FedRAMP certification and compliance under CR26 (FedRAMP Consolidated Rules for 2026). Use this skill whenever a user asks about FedRAMP authorization, ATO (Authority to Operate), cloud security for federal government, NIST SP 800-53 controls, CSP compliance, or any of the core FedRAMP document…
eu-cra
Expert EU Cyber Resilience Act (CRA) advisor for Regulation (EU) 2024/2847 — mandatory cybersecurity and vulnerability handling requirements for all products with digital elements (PDEs) sold in the EU. Use this skill for gap analysis, product classification (Default / Class I / Class II), conformity assessment route…