Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add zgbrenner/agentcounsel --skill preference-demand-response-triagegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/zgbrenner/agentcounselWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/zgbrenner/agentcounsel/preference-demand-response-triage)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/zgbrenner/agentcounsel/preference-demand-response-triage"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/zgbrenner/agentcounsel/preference-demand-response-triage/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/zgbrenner/agentcounsel/preference-demand-response-triage"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/zgbrenner/agentcounsel/preference-demand-response-triage.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00033 | $0.01412 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00016 | $0.00706 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00007 | $0.00282 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00141 |
Grade A, and why
Preference Demand Response Triage scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 139 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Preference Demand Response Triage
Purpose
Organize the facts for responding to a preference demand into a source-cited transfer timeline and defense-facts checklist, with missing documents, response-planning issues, and verification questions, so a qualified attorney can evaluate the demand and a response. This skill organizes facts; it determines no preference liability and no available defense. It produces draft legal work product for attorney review — not legal advice.
Use When
- A creditor has received a preference demand and the underlying facts must be organized before an attorney evaluates a response.
- A team needs the alleged transfers, invoice and payment history, and defense-relevant facts captured with sources.
- A preference matter must be triaged before substantive analysis or settlement discussion.
Required Inputs
- The preference demand letter, with source references.
- The alleged transfer dates and amounts as stated in the demand.
- Invoice history and payment history, with source references.
- The creditor relationship and its history with the debtor.
- Facts the user provides that may bear on common defense themes — ordinary course of business, new value, and contemporaneous exchange — recorded as facts only, never as a defense conclusion.
- Security interests and any collateral facts.
- Settlement posture and litigation status.
- Any user-supplied response deadline, echoed and marked
[deadline verification required].
If the demand letter, the alleged transfers, or the creditor relationship is
missing, record it as not provided and return the missing-information list
first.
Do Not Use When
- The request is to determine whether a transfer is avoidable or preferential.
- The request is to determine whether a defense applies, to assess exposure, or to advise on settlement.
- The request is for legal advice or a deadline calculation.
Also out of scope (this skill does not): determine whether a transfer is avoidable or preferential; determine whether any defense applies or its strength; assess exposure; advise on settlement; or constitute legal advice.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 139 lines · 33 tokens per session scan A 8d8f819f14d7
Preference Demand Response Triage is a skill published in the GitHub repository zgbrenner/agentcounsel (19 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 33 tokens to every session and 1,412 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
legal-research
A legal research skill for finding and analysing laws and court cases, including similar cases. It requires access to a reliable legal research database before producing a formal report.
document-fill
A document-filling assistant that uses a supplied template and case files to fill in forms, contracts, or legal documents. It also reports where each filled value came from and which details are missing.
contract-review
A contract-review workflow for agreements governed by Chinese law, United States law, or both. It examines clauses one by one and produces a list of legal-risk questions, with an optional marked-up Word document.
fedramp
Expert guidance for FedRAMP certification and compliance under CR26 (FedRAMP Consolidated Rules for 2026). Use this skill whenever a user asks about FedRAMP authorization, ATO (Authority to Operate), cloud security for federal government, NIST SP 800-53 controls, CSP compliance, or any of the core FedRAMP document…
eu-cra
Expert EU Cyber Resilience Act (CRA) advisor for Regulation (EU) 2024/2847 — mandatory cybersecurity and vulnerability handling requirements for all products with digital elements (PDEs) sold in the EU. Use this skill for gap analysis, product classification (Default / Class I / Class II), conformity assessment route…
aenderungsvorbehalt-308
Für Änderungsvorbehalt 308: ordnet Norm, Beweislast und Gegenargument; Ergebnis: Prüfprodukt mit Risiko und nächstem Schritt.