Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add zgbrenner/agentcounsel --skill purchase-agreement-issue-listgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/zgbrenner/agentcounselWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/zgbrenner/agentcounsel/purchase-agreement-issue-list)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/zgbrenner/agentcounsel/purchase-agreement-issue-list"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/zgbrenner/agentcounsel/purchase-agreement-issue-list/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/zgbrenner/agentcounsel/purchase-agreement-issue-list"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/zgbrenner/agentcounsel/purchase-agreement-issue-list.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00047 | $0.03340 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00023 | $0.01670 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00009 | $0.00668 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00334 |
Grade A, and why
Purchase Agreement Issue List scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 274 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Purchase Agreement Issue List
Purpose
Review a definitive M&A acquisition agreement — a merger agreement, stock purchase agreement, asset purchase agreement, membership-interest purchase agreement, or a similar acquisition agreement — from a stated side of the deal, and surface the issues it raises: the deal structure and consideration it sets, the risk it allocates, the terms worth negotiating, and the provisions it leaves out.
This skill produces draft work product for attorney review only. It is not legal advice and is not a final negotiating position. A purchase agreement is the document that, once signed, governs the transaction; whether to sign or close it is an attorney and client decision, not an output of this skill.
Use When
- A user asks to "review this purchase agreement," "review this merger agreement," "flag the issues in this SPA or APA," "what should we push back on in this acquisition agreement," or "is this agreement reasonable for the buyer or the seller."
- A deal team needs a structured read of a definitive acquisition agreement before signing it, countering it, or escalating it to counsel.
- A draft merger, stock purchase, asset purchase, or membership-interest purchase agreement must be turned into an issue list and risk matrix as the front end of negotiation.
Required Inputs
- The purchase agreement text — the full merger, stock purchase, asset purchase, membership-interest purchase, or similar acquisition agreement, uploaded or pasted. Do not review from a description, a summary, or a partial excerpt.
- The side the review is for — buyer-side or seller-side. Where relevant, note also whether the side is the acquiring company, the target, or an investor.
- The deal type — a merger, stock purchase, asset purchase, membership-interest purchase, or other acquisition structure.
- The transaction stage — for example a first-draft review, a markup exchange, signing, or pre-closing.
- The governing agreement and document set — the schedules, exhibits, disclosure schedules, ancillary agreements, and any prior LOI or term sheet, noting which are provided and which are missing.
- Jurisdiction and governing law — as stated in the agreement, or flagged as unknown.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 274 lines · 47 tokens per session scan A 25454b09487a
Purchase Agreement Issue List is a skill published in the GitHub repository zgbrenner/agentcounsel (19 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 47 tokens to every session and 3,340 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
legal-research
A legal research skill for finding and analysing laws and court cases, including similar cases. It requires access to a reliable legal research database before producing a formal report.
document-fill
A document-filling assistant that uses a supplied template and case files to fill in forms, contracts, or legal documents. It also reports where each filled value came from and which details are missing.
contract-review
A contract-review workflow for agreements governed by Chinese law, United States law, or both. It examines clauses one by one and produces a list of legal-risk questions, with an optional marked-up Word document.
redline-sentry
Review NDAs, MSAs, DPAs, SaaS agreements, and other procurement contracts against a configurable risk playbook. Use whenever the user drops a contract file (PDF, DOCX) and asks to redline, review, summarise risk, check clauses, or "what would procurement say". Trigger on phrases like "review this NDA", "redline this…
fedramp
Expert guidance for FedRAMP certification and compliance under CR26 (FedRAMP Consolidated Rules for 2026). Use this skill whenever a user asks about FedRAMP authorization, ATO (Authority to Operate), cloud security for federal government, NIST SP 800-53 controls, CSP compliance, or any of the core FedRAMP document…
eu-cra
Expert EU Cyber Resilience Act (CRA) advisor for Regulation (EU) 2024/2847 — mandatory cybersecurity and vulnerability handling requirements for all products with digital elements (PDEs) sold in the EU. Use this skill for gap analysis, product classification (Default / Class I / Class II), conformity assessment route…