Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add zgbrenner/agentcounsel --skill reduction-in-force-reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/zgbrenner/agentcounselWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/zgbrenner/agentcounsel/reduction-in-force-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/zgbrenner/agentcounsel/reduction-in-force-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/zgbrenner/agentcounsel/reduction-in-force-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/zgbrenner/agentcounsel/reduction-in-force-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/zgbrenner/agentcounsel/reduction-in-force-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00053 | $0.03716 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00026 | $0.01858 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00011 | $0.00743 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00372 |
Grade A, and why
Reduction in Force Review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 155 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Reduction in Force Review
Purpose
Produce a structured, attorney-ready organization of a proposed group termination or reduction in force (RIF) before it proceeds. The skill documents the business rationale, the decisional unit and selection process as described, and the proposed severance and communication plan; frames adverse-impact and comparator questions for counsel; and flags group-notice and group-release formalities as verification items. It never computes or concludes on disparate impact, never asserts a notice threshold, headcount trigger, or notice period, and never computes a date. This is draft legal work product for attorney review — not legal advice.
Use When
- An employer, HR team, or in-house counsel is planning a layoff, restructuring, site closure, or other group termination and wants the legal review points organized before decisions are finalized.
- Counsel needs a structured intake of a proposed RIF — rationale, decisional unit, criteria, selection list status, severance plan, and timeline — to begin their own risk assessment.
- A user says "we're planning a RIF — what should legal be looking at?" or "help me organize this layoff for outside counsel."
- The selection process or criteria are still being designed and the team wants the adverse-impact and consistency questions surfaced early.
- A group severance program is being prepared and the group-release documentation items need to be inventoried.
Required Inputs
- Business rationale: the employer's stated reason for the reduction (cost, restructuring, site closure, product discontinuation, or other), recorded precisely as stated.
- Decisional unit(s) and selection process as described: the organizational scope within which selections are or will be made, who decides, who reviews, and the sequence of the process.
- Selection criteria as described: the stated criteria (role elimination, skills, performance, tenure, or other) and whether they are objective, subjective, or mixed.
- Selection list status: whether a proposed list exists; if provided, the affected roles, levels, and work locations as stated. Use anonymized identifiers — do not place employee names into reusable work product.
- Proposed severance, benefits, and release terms, if any: the proposed structure, tiers, and any draft release documents referenced.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 155 lines · 53 tokens per session scan A 8c09436b1d56
Reduction in Force Review is a skill published in the GitHub repository zgbrenner/agentcounsel (19 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 53 tokens to every session and 3,716 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
legal-research
A legal research skill for finding and analysing laws and court cases, including similar cases. It requires access to a reliable legal research database before producing a formal report.
document-fill
A document-filling assistant that uses a supplied template and case files to fill in forms, contracts, or legal documents. It also reports where each filled value came from and which details are missing.
contract-review
A contract-review workflow for agreements governed by Chinese law, United States law, or both. It examines clauses one by one and produces a list of legal-risk questions, with an optional marked-up Word document.
fedramp
Expert guidance for FedRAMP certification and compliance under CR26 (FedRAMP Consolidated Rules for 2026). Use this skill whenever a user asks about FedRAMP authorization, ATO (Authority to Operate), cloud security for federal government, NIST SP 800-53 controls, CSP compliance, or any of the core FedRAMP document…
eu-cra
Expert EU Cyber Resilience Act (CRA) advisor for Regulation (EU) 2024/2847 — mandatory cybersecurity and vulnerability handling requirements for all products with digital elements (PDEs) sold in the EU. Use this skill for gap analysis, product classification (Default / Class I / Class II), conformity assessment route…
aenderungsvorbehalt-308
Für Änderungsvorbehalt 308: ordnet Norm, Beweislast und Gegenargument; Ergebnis: Prüfprodukt mit Risiko und nächstem Schritt.