Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add zgbrenner/agentcounsel --skill restructuring-term-sheet-reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/zgbrenner/agentcounselWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/zgbrenner/agentcounsel/restructuring-term-sheet-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/zgbrenner/agentcounsel/restructuring-term-sheet-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/zgbrenner/agentcounsel/restructuring-term-sheet-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/zgbrenner/agentcounsel/restructuring-term-sheet-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/zgbrenner/agentcounsel/restructuring-term-sheet-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00043 | $0.01519 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00022 | $0.00759 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00009 | $0.00304 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00152 |
Grade A, and why
Restructuring Term Sheet Review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 145 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Restructuring Term Sheet Review
Purpose
Review a restructuring support agreement, forbearance agreement, exchange offer, workout term sheet, lender proposal, plan support term sheet, or restructuring transaction summary into a source-cited key terms table, an issue list, a risk matrix, and negotiation points, so a qualified attorney can evaluate the document from the user's perspective. This skill extracts and organizes terms; it concludes nothing on enforceability or legal sufficiency. It produces draft legal work product for attorney review — not legal advice.
Use When
- A restructuring support agreement, forbearance agreement, exchange offer, workout term sheet, or plan support term sheet must be reviewed and organized for an attorney.
- A negotiating party needs the key terms, issues, and risks mapped from one side's perspective.
- Restructuring terms must be checked for completeness before negotiation or signing.
Required Inputs
- The restructuring document, with source references.
- The user's party role and perspective (debtor-side, lender-side, creditor-side, committee-side, or other).
- The parties, the debt instruments involved, and the transaction type.
- The terms to review, as written — for example milestones if supplied, releases, covenants, payment terms, collateral, guaranties, consents, defaults, fees, voting and support obligations, termination rights, exclusivity, confidentiality, and conditions.
- Any milestone dates or deadlines, echoed and marked
[deadline verification required]. - Source references to sections, clauses, or pages.
If the document, the user's role, or the transaction type is missing, record it
as not provided and return the missing-information list first.
Do Not Use When
- The request is to conclude whether the document or a term is enforceable or legally sufficient, or to conclude plan feasibility.
- The request is to determine the legal effect of a release, covenant, or condition, or to draft final clause language.
- The request is for legal advice or a deadline calculation.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago First seen · 145 lines · 43 tokens per session scan A 78512e474abc
Restructuring Term Sheet Review is a skill published in the GitHub repository zgbrenner/agentcounsel (19 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 43 tokens to every session and 1,519 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
legal-research
A legal research skill for finding and analysing laws and court cases, including similar cases. It requires access to a reliable legal research database before producing a formal report.
document-fill
A document-filling assistant that uses a supplied template and case files to fill in forms, contracts, or legal documents. It also reports where each filled value came from and which details are missing.
contract-review
A contract-review workflow for agreements governed by Chinese law, United States law, or both. It examines clauses one by one and produces a list of legal-risk questions, with an optional marked-up Word document.
eu-cra
Expert EU Cyber Resilience Act (CRA) advisor for Regulation (EU) 2024/2847 — mandatory cybersecurity and vulnerability handling requirements for all products with digital elements (PDEs) sold in the EU. Use this skill for gap analysis, product classification (Default / Class I / Class II), conformity assessment route…
fedramp
Expert guidance for FedRAMP certification and compliance under CR26 (FedRAMP Consolidated Rules for 2026). Use this skill whenever a user asks about FedRAMP authorization, ATO (Authority to Operate), cloud security for federal government, NIST SP 800-53 controls, CSP compliance, or any of the core FedRAMP document…
aenderungsvorbehalt-308
Für Änderungsvorbehalt 308: ordnet Norm, Beweislast und Gegenargument; Ergebnis: Prüfprodukt mit Risiko und nächstem Schritt.