Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add zgbrenner/agentcounsel --skill risk-assessmentgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/zgbrenner/agentcounselWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/zgbrenner/agentcounsel/risk-assessment)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/zgbrenner/agentcounsel/risk-assessment"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/zgbrenner/agentcounsel/risk-assessment/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/zgbrenner/agentcounsel/risk-assessment"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/zgbrenner/agentcounsel/risk-assessment.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00042 | $0.02995 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00021 | $0.01497 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00008 | $0.00599 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00299 |
Grade A, and why
Risk Assessment scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 158 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Risk Assessment
Purpose
Apply a structured, jurisdiction-agnostic method for identifying, rating, and prioritizing legal risk across a situation, transaction, document, or matter. The skill guides systematic decomposition of the situation into discrete risks; for each risk, it rates likelihood and impact, assigns a severity band, and separates legal risk from business and operational impact. The output is a prioritized risk register — a structured reference that enables a supervising attorney to focus attention, allocate resources, and make informed judgments.
All ratings produced by this skill are preliminary triage signals for attorney judgment. They are not predictions of litigation outcome, not legal conclusions, and not legal advice. The skill does not assess the enforceability of any right, the validity of any claim, or the probability of any legal result. Those determinations belong to the supervising attorney.
Use When
- A user asks to "assess the risks," "identify the legal exposure," "flag the issues," or "map the risk" in a transaction, document, agreement, matter, or situation.
- An attorney or legal team needs a structured first-pass risk inventory before deciding how to proceed.
- Multiple risk areas are potentially in play and need to be organized, compared, and prioritized for attorney attention.
- A preliminary risk picture is needed to support a business or internal decision, with the explicit understanding that attorney review is required before reliance.
- A matter intake, contract review, or legal research memo has been completed and the next step is organizing identified issues into a risk register for the responsible attorney.
- Recurring risk-assessment needs (portfolio management, transaction screening, compliance review) call for a repeatable, structured methodology.
Required Inputs
- A description of the situation, transaction, document, or matter to be assessed. The more specific the input, the more targeted the risk identification.
- The client's role and posture: who the client is, what position they occupy, and what they are trying to achieve or protect.
- The practice area or subject-matter scope of the assessment — specifying whether the assessment is limited to, for example, contract risk, regulatory exposure, employment risk, or all legal risk.
- Optional but recommended: the jurisdiction and governing law. If not provided, all jurisdiction-specific risk characterizations must carry
[verify jurisdiction]. - Optional: any documents, provisions, facts, or prior work product bearing on the risks — for example, a contract reviewed under
nda-review, an intake summary, or a prior legal research memo. These are incorporated as inputs, not verified independently by this skill. - Optional: any known risk tolerance, materiality threshold, or risk-management policy the client applies.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 158 lines · 42 tokens per session scan A 2a526f1e61e2
Risk Assessment is a skill published in the GitHub repository zgbrenner/agentcounsel (19 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 42 tokens to every session and 2,995 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
legal-research
A legal research skill for finding and analysing laws and court cases, including similar cases. It requires access to a reliable legal research database before producing a formal report.
document-fill
A document-filling assistant that uses a supplied template and case files to fill in forms, contracts, or legal documents. It also reports where each filled value came from and which details are missing.
contract-review
A contract-review workflow for agreements governed by Chinese law, United States law, or both. It examines clauses one by one and produces a list of legal-risk questions, with an optional marked-up Word document.
fedramp
Expert guidance for FedRAMP certification and compliance under CR26 (FedRAMP Consolidated Rules for 2026). Use this skill whenever a user asks about FedRAMP authorization, ATO (Authority to Operate), cloud security for federal government, NIST SP 800-53 controls, CSP compliance, or any of the core FedRAMP document…
eu-cra
Expert EU Cyber Resilience Act (CRA) advisor for Regulation (EU) 2024/2847 — mandatory cybersecurity and vulnerability handling requirements for all products with digital elements (PDEs) sold in the EU. Use this skill for gap analysis, product classification (Default / Class I / Class II), conformity assessment route…
aenderungsvorbehalt-308
Für Änderungsvorbehalt 308: ordnet Norm, Beweislast und Gegenargument; Ergebnis: Prüfprodukt mit Risiko und nächstem Schritt.