Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add zgbrenner/agentcounsel --skill sec-filing-consistency-checkgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/zgbrenner/agentcounselWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/zgbrenner/agentcounsel/sec-filing-consistency-check)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/zgbrenner/agentcounsel/sec-filing-consistency-check"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/zgbrenner/agentcounsel/sec-filing-consistency-check/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/zgbrenner/agentcounsel/sec-filing-consistency-check"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/zgbrenner/agentcounsel/sec-filing-consistency-check.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00072 | $0.02151 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00036 | $0.01076 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00014 | $0.00430 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00215 |
Grade A, and why
SEC Filing Consistency Check scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 122 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
SEC Filing Consistency Check
Purpose
Cross-check a set of SEC filings for internal and cross-filing consistency, surfacing numerical, narrative, defined-term, and disclosure-item discrepancies. The skill records discrepancies; the attorney concludes materiality. This skill provides draft work product for attorney review only and is not legal advice.
Use When
- A new filing is being prepared and the deal team needs a structured consistency pass against recent periodic filings.
- A restatement, amendment, or correction is being considered and the user needs to inventory affected cross-references.
- A registration statement is being assembled and the user needs to confirm consistency with the most recent 10-K, 10-Q, 8-Ks, and proxy.
Required Inputs
- Jurisdiction and governing law, or
[verify jurisdiction]. - The filing set in scope: 10-K, 10-Q, 8-K(s), S-1/S-3/S-4, prospectus supplement, proxy, Form D, other.
- For each filing: type, period covered, filing date
[deadline verification required], source text. - Any earnings releases, investor-presentation materials, or other public statements the user wants compared.
- The issuer's segments / geographies / product lines as currently disclosed.
- Defined-term list, if available.
If the filing set or filing-period inventory is missing, stop substantive analysis and return an intake gap list.
Do Not Use When
- The user asks for a materiality conclusion about any discrepancy.
- The user asks for a final filing decision or approval to file.
- The user asks for the risk-factor section to be substantively reviewed alone (route to
risk-factor-review). - The user asks for the offering-document review to be performed alone (route to
offering-document-disclosure-review).
Also out of scope (this skill does not): provide final legal conclusions, approve filings or transactions, conclude on materiality, compute deadlines, or provide investment, tax, broker-dealer, exchange, FINRA, blue-sky, or investment-company conclusions.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 122 lines · 72 tokens per session scan A 68450608f96b
SEC Filing Consistency Check is a skill published in the GitHub repository zgbrenner/agentcounsel (19 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 72 tokens to every session and 2,151 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
fiscaliste
Fiscaliste IA pour la fiscalité personnelle des particuliers français : optimisation et déclaration de l'impôt sur le revenu, IFI, revenus du capital, revenus fonciers, equity salarial, crypto-actifs et PER. Couvre le calcul de l'IR (barème, quotient familial, décote, PAS, CEHR, revenus exceptionnels), la déclaration…
controleur-fiscal
Inspecteur des finances publiques IA. Simule un contrôle fiscal DGFIP complet sur les comptes d'une entreprise française (SASU, EURL, SAS, SARL). Analyse le FEC, la liasse fiscale, les charges déduites, le compte courant d'associé, la TVA, l'IS selon 8 axes de vérification. Identifie les chefs de redressement…
commissaire-aux-comptes
Commissaire aux comptes IA pour l'audit des comptes annuels d'entreprises françaises. Applique la démarche NEP en 7 phases : prise de connaissance, contrôle du FEC, vérification du bilan, du compte de résultat, de la balance, de la liasse fiscale, et contrôles transversaux. Émet une opinion motivée sur la fiabilité…
agb-bei-kreditvertraegen-verbraucherdarlehen
Für AGB bei Kreditverträgen Verbraucherdarlehen: ordnet Norm, Beweislast und Gegenargument; Ergebnis: Prüfprodukt mit Risiko und nächstem Schritt.
agb-in-kapitalanlagen-effektenhandel
Für AGB in Kapitalanlagen Effektenhandel: ordnet Norm, Beweislast und Gegenargument; Ergebnis: Prüfprodukt mit Risiko und nächstem Schritt.
internal-controls-and-audit
Designs and tests controls over financial reporting — segregation of duties, approval limits, evidence, and preparing for audit. Use this to design controls for a process, prepare for an external audit, respond to an audit finding, set approval thresholds, or assess where a small team's segregation of duties is…