Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add zgbrenner/agentcounsel --skill spousal-support-facts-intakegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/zgbrenner/agentcounselWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/zgbrenner/agentcounsel/spousal-support-facts-intake)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/zgbrenner/agentcounsel/spousal-support-facts-intake"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/zgbrenner/agentcounsel/spousal-support-facts-intake/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/zgbrenner/agentcounsel/spousal-support-facts-intake"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/zgbrenner/agentcounsel/spousal-support-facts-intake.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00041 | $0.01639 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00020 | $0.00820 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00008 | $0.00328 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00164 |
Grade A, and why
Spousal Support Facts Intake scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 110 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Spousal Support Facts Intake
Purpose
Gather the facts relevant to a spousal support or alimony review — the relationship or marriage duration if provided, income, expenses, employment, health facts if provided, standard-of-living facts if provided, assets and debts, existing orders, and financial disclosures — into a structured intake table, a missing-documents list, and questions for counsel, so a qualified, licensed attorney has an organized fact set. This skill organizes what the user provides; it calculates no support and determines no entitlement.
Use When
- A spousal support or alimony review is starting and the relevant facts must be organized for an attorney.
- Income, expense, employment, and standard-of-living facts must be captured in a structured intake before counsel applies the governing law.
- An attorney needs a missing-documents list before a support analysis.
Required Inputs
- The jurisdiction and governing law — or
not provided, flagged[verify jurisdiction]. - The relationship or marriage duration if the user provides it (marriage and separation dates echoed verbatim and marked
[deadline verification required]) — otherwisenot provided. - Income, expenses, and employment facts for each party as the user states them — or
not provided. - Health facts and standard-of-living facts if the user wishes to record them (stated as facts, not assessed) — or
not provided. - Assets and debts as the user states them, and existing support orders — or
not provided. - The financial disclosures exchanged, the parties and their roles, and the case stage — or
not provided. - Source references to any disclosures, pay records, statements, or orders provided.
If the jurisdiction or the parties is missing, record it as not provided and return the missing-information list first.
Do Not Use When
- The request is to calculate spousal support or alimony, or to estimate an amount or duration.
- The request is to determine entitlement, or to determine or impute income or earning capacity.
- The request is for legal advice or a litigation strategy.
- A detailed property/debt schedule is the goal (use
asset-debt-schedule-builder).
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 110 lines · 41 tokens per session scan A 6217367263ab
Spousal Support Facts Intake is a skill published in the GitHub repository zgbrenner/agentcounsel (19 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 41 tokens to every session and 1,639 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
legal-research
A legal research skill for finding and analysing laws and court cases, including similar cases. It requires access to a reliable legal research database before producing a formal report.
document-fill
A document-filling assistant that uses a supplied template and case files to fill in forms, contracts, or legal documents. It also reports where each filled value came from and which details are missing.
contract-review
A contract-review workflow for agreements governed by Chinese law, United States law, or both. It examines clauses one by one and produces a list of legal-risk questions, with an optional marked-up Word document.
fedramp
Expert guidance for FedRAMP certification and compliance under CR26 (FedRAMP Consolidated Rules for 2026). Use this skill whenever a user asks about FedRAMP authorization, ATO (Authority to Operate), cloud security for federal government, NIST SP 800-53 controls, CSP compliance, or any of the core FedRAMP document…
eu-cra
Expert EU Cyber Resilience Act (CRA) advisor for Regulation (EU) 2024/2847 — mandatory cybersecurity and vulnerability handling requirements for all products with digital elements (PDEs) sold in the EU. Use this skill for gap analysis, product classification (Default / Class I / Class II), conformity assessment route…
aenderungsvorbehalt-308
Für Änderungsvorbehalt 308: ordnet Norm, Beweislast und Gegenargument; Ergebnis: Prüfprodukt mit Risiko und nächstem Schritt.