Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add zgbrenner/agentcounsel --skill tax-covenants-indemnities-reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/zgbrenner/agentcounselWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/zgbrenner/agentcounsel/tax-covenants-indemnities-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/zgbrenner/agentcounsel/tax-covenants-indemnities-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/zgbrenner/agentcounsel/tax-covenants-indemnities-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/zgbrenner/agentcounsel/tax-covenants-indemnities-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/zgbrenner/agentcounsel/tax-covenants-indemnities-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00034 | $0.03409 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00017 | $0.01705 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00007 | $0.00682 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00341 |
Grade A, and why
Tax Covenants Indemnities Review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 288 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Tax Covenants Indemnities Review
Purpose
Review the tax covenants and indemnities of a transaction agreement and map
their architecture, issues, and negotiation points — all source-cited — so tax
counsel can verify the tax-risk allocation from the user's perspective. This
skill maps and organizes the provisions; it does not determine enforceability,
tax treatment, or adequacy. skills/tax/references/issue-catalog.md (Section
5) generalizes this mechanic taxonomy as a scan aid; this skill's own
step-by-step workflow below remains the authoritative, line-by-line review.
Use When
- A transaction agreement's tax covenants and indemnities must be mapped and organized for tax counsel.
- A negotiating team needs the tax-risk-allocation architecture and its gaps surfaced from one side's perspective.
- Tax indemnity mechanics must be checked for completeness before signing.
Required Inputs
- The transaction agreement and its tax covenant and indemnity provisions.
- The user's role and perspective (buyer, seller, or other).
- Transaction type, jurisdictions, and the review purpose, or
not provided/[verify jurisdiction]. - Source references to sections, clauses, schedules, or pages.
- Any Straddle Period, pre-closing, or post-closing facts the user provides.
- Whether the review should cover: pre-closing and post-closing taxes, Straddle Period allocation, transfer taxes, tax refunds, tax contests, cooperation, filing control, indemnity scope, survival, caps, baskets, exclusions, exclusive remedy, and procedures.
If the agreement text, the user's role, or the transaction type is missing,
record it as not provided and return the missing-information list first.
Do Not Use When
- The request is to determine the enforceability of a covenant or indemnity.
- The request is to decide the tax treatment of a provision or whether the indemnity terms are adequate.
- The request is to compute exposure, draft final clause language, or for tax advice.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 288 lines · 34 tokens per session scan A fd7441ae4fcf
Tax Covenants Indemnities Review is a skill published in the GitHub repository zgbrenner/agentcounsel (19 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 34 tokens to every session and 3,409 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
legal-research
A legal research skill for finding and analysing laws and court cases, including similar cases. It requires access to a reliable legal research database before producing a formal report.
document-fill
A document-filling assistant that uses a supplied template and case files to fill in forms, contracts, or legal documents. It also reports where each filled value came from and which details are missing.
contract-review
A contract-review workflow for agreements governed by Chinese law, United States law, or both. It examines clauses one by one and produces a list of legal-risk questions, with an optional marked-up Word document.
fedramp
Expert guidance for FedRAMP certification and compliance under CR26 (FedRAMP Consolidated Rules for 2026). Use this skill whenever a user asks about FedRAMP authorization, ATO (Authority to Operate), cloud security for federal government, NIST SP 800-53 controls, CSP compliance, or any of the core FedRAMP document…
eu-cra
Expert EU Cyber Resilience Act (CRA) advisor for Regulation (EU) 2024/2847 — mandatory cybersecurity and vulnerability handling requirements for all products with digital elements (PDEs) sold in the EU. Use this skill for gap analysis, product classification (Default / Class I / Class II), conformity assessment route…
aenderungsvorbehalt-308
Für Änderungsvorbehalt 308: ordnet Norm, Beweislast und Gegenargument; Ergebnis: Prüfprodukt mit Risiko und nächstem Schritt.