Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add zgbrenner/agentcounsel --skill trade-association-meeting-reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/zgbrenner/agentcounselWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/zgbrenner/agentcounsel/trade-association-meeting-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/zgbrenner/agentcounsel/trade-association-meeting-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/zgbrenner/agentcounsel/trade-association-meeting-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/zgbrenner/agentcounsel/trade-association-meeting-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/zgbrenner/agentcounsel/trade-association-meeting-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00083 | $0.02701 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00042 | $0.01350 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00017 | $0.00540 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00270 |
Grade A, and why
Trade Association Meeting Review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 128 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Trade Association Meeting Review
Purpose
Review trade-association activity — an upcoming agenda, the minutes or notes of a past meeting, attendee lists, and output products such as statistics and benchmarking reports — and organize the antitrust record: an attendee map by competitive relationship, a per-agenda-item risk matrix with the controls in place, verbatim excerpts of high-risk discussion, an output-product inventory, and separate standard-setting and boycott flags. The deliverable is draft legal work product for attorney review: the skill flags for counsel and never approves attendance, blesses a topic as safe, or concludes lawfulness.
Use When
- An employee asks whether they can attend an upcoming association meeting, and counsel wants the agenda and attendee list screened first.
- The board or compliance asks whether the association's benchmarking or statistics program is safe to join, and its aggregation and recipient controls need review.
- Minutes or notes from a past meeting record discussion of prices, capacity, customers, or "industry discipline," and the exposure needs to be documented.
- A working group is drafting a standard, joint position, or model contract, raising standard-setting (F/RAND, patent-disclosure) questions.
- Association communications contain language about members collectively declining to deal with a supplier, customer, or non-member.
- Hallway, dinner, or side-meeting conversations at an association event may have touched competitively sensitive topics.
Required Inputs
- Jurisdiction(s) of competitive effect — every country and, where relevant, state/province where the association or its members operate, or
[verify jurisdiction]. - Association context — association name, membership composition (competitors / suppliers / customers / mixed), meeting type (board, members' meeting, committee, working group, conference, social), meeting date
[deadline verification required]if user-supplied. - Attendees — list of attendees, member entities, competitive relationship, role at meeting, level (executive / commercial / legal / technical). Mark unknowns
unknown/not found/not provided/ambiguous. - Agenda items and topics — verbatim agenda text where available; each topic categorized by risk: high (pricing, costs, customers, output, capacity, wages/hiring, future plans, strategy, market allocation, boycott language), medium (industry conditions, regulatory developments, future planning broadly), low (legislative advocacy, sponsor recognition, social).
- Discussion content (if user has minutes/notes/recording transcripts) — what was said, by whom, with verbatim quotes where available.
- Outputs produced or to be produced — published statistics, benchmarking reports, joint positions, standards, model contracts, model policies.
- Antitrust counsel oversight — antitrust statement read at opening? counsel present? agenda pre-cleared by counsel? minutes reviewed by counsel? formal antitrust policy applied?
- Side meetings and informal contacts — pre- or post-meeting communications, side meetings, social events, dinner conversations involving competitors.
- Documents and source anchors — agenda, minutes, notes, presentations, attendee list, association policies.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 128 lines · 83 tokens per session scan A c41dec58491e
Trade Association Meeting Review is a skill published in the GitHub repository zgbrenner/agentcounsel (19 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 83 tokens to every session and 2,701 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
legal-research
A legal research skill for finding and analysing laws and court cases, including similar cases. It requires access to a reliable legal research database before producing a formal report.
document-fill
A document-filling assistant that uses a supplied template and case files to fill in forms, contracts, or legal documents. It also reports where each filled value came from and which details are missing.
contract-review
A contract-review workflow for agreements governed by Chinese law, United States law, or both. It examines clauses one by one and produces a list of legal-risk questions, with an optional marked-up Word document.
fedramp
Expert guidance for FedRAMP certification and compliance under CR26 (FedRAMP Consolidated Rules for 2026). Use this skill whenever a user asks about FedRAMP authorization, ATO (Authority to Operate), cloud security for federal government, NIST SP 800-53 controls, CSP compliance, or any of the core FedRAMP document…
eu-cra
Expert EU Cyber Resilience Act (CRA) advisor for Regulation (EU) 2024/2847 — mandatory cybersecurity and vulnerability handling requirements for all products with digital elements (PDEs) sold in the EU. Use this skill for gap analysis, product classification (Default / Class I / Class II), conformity assessment route…
aenderungsvorbehalt-308
Für Änderungsvorbehalt 308: ordnet Norm, Beweislast und Gegenargument; Ergebnis: Prüfprodukt mit Risiko und nächstem Schritt.