Trade Association Meeting Review

Trade Association Meeting Review is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from zgbrenner/agentcounsel. It costs 83 tokens per session (2,701 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

An antitrust-focused review workflow for trade-association meetings, agendas, minutes, attendee lists, and related statistics or benchmarking programs.

In plain words
What is it for?
It is for mapping attendees, screening agenda items, recording high-risk excerpts, and flagging standard-setting or boycott concerns.
Why use it?
It organizes potentially risky discussions and controls so counsel can review them without the tool declaring an activity lawful or safe.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Written for no agent in particular: nothing here depends on one.

Good fit It is for mapping attendees, screening agenda items, recording high-risk excerpts, and flagging standard-setting or boycott concerns.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/zgbrenner/agentcounsel/trade-association-meeting-review
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add zgbrenner/agentcounsel --skill trade-association-meeting-review
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/zgbrenner/agentcounsel

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for Trade Association Meeting Review

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/zgbrenner/agentcounsel/trade-association-meeting-review/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/zgbrenner/agentcounsel/trade-association-meeting-review)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/zgbrenner/agentcounsel/trade-association-meeting-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/zgbrenner/agentcounsel/trade-association-meeting-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for Trade Association Meeting Review

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/zgbrenner/agentcounsel/trade-association-meeting-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/zgbrenner/agentcounsel/trade-association-meeting-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 83 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 2,701 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00083 $0.02701
Opus 5 $0.00042 $0.01350
Sonnet 5 $0.00017 $0.00540
Haiku 4.5 $0.00008 $0.00270

Measured 12d ago against content hash c41dec58491e, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-12, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

Trade Association Meeting Review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

skills/antitrust-competition/trade-association-meeting-review/SKILL.md · 128 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 128 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Trade Association Meeting Review

Purpose

Review trade-association activity — an upcoming agenda, the minutes or notes of a past meeting, attendee lists, and output products such as statistics and benchmarking reports — and organize the antitrust record: an attendee map by competitive relationship, a per-agenda-item risk matrix with the controls in place, verbatim excerpts of high-risk discussion, an output-product inventory, and separate standard-setting and boycott flags. The deliverable is draft legal work product for attorney review: the skill flags for counsel and never approves attendance, blesses a topic as safe, or concludes lawfulness.

Use When

  • An employee asks whether they can attend an upcoming association meeting, and counsel wants the agenda and attendee list screened first.
  • The board or compliance asks whether the association's benchmarking or statistics program is safe to join, and its aggregation and recipient controls need review.
  • Minutes or notes from a past meeting record discussion of prices, capacity, customers, or "industry discipline," and the exposure needs to be documented.
  • A working group is drafting a standard, joint position, or model contract, raising standard-setting (F/RAND, patent-disclosure) questions.
  • Association communications contain language about members collectively declining to deal with a supplier, customer, or non-member.
  • Hallway, dinner, or side-meeting conversations at an association event may have touched competitively sensitive topics.

Required Inputs

  • Jurisdiction(s) of competitive effect — every country and, where relevant, state/province where the association or its members operate, or [verify jurisdiction].
  • Association context — association name, membership composition (competitors / suppliers / customers / mixed), meeting type (board, members' meeting, committee, working group, conference, social), meeting date [deadline verification required] if user-supplied.
  • Attendees — list of attendees, member entities, competitive relationship, role at meeting, level (executive / commercial / legal / technical). Mark unknowns unknown/not found/not provided/ambiguous.
  • Agenda items and topics — verbatim agenda text where available; each topic categorized by risk: high (pricing, costs, customers, output, capacity, wages/hiring, future plans, strategy, market allocation, boycott language), medium (industry conditions, regulatory developments, future planning broadly), low (legislative advocacy, sponsor recognition, social).
  • Discussion content (if user has minutes/notes/recording transcripts) — what was said, by whom, with verbatim quotes where available.
  • Outputs produced or to be produced — published statistics, benchmarking reports, joint positions, standards, model contracts, model policies.
  • Antitrust counsel oversight — antitrust statement read at opening? counsel present? agenda pre-cleared by counsel? minutes reviewed by counsel? formal antitrust policy applied?
  • Side meetings and informal contacts — pre- or post-meeting communications, side meetings, social events, dinner conversations involving competitors.
  • Documents and source anchors — agenda, minutes, notes, presentations, attendee list, association policies.

Read the full file on GitHub · 128 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 12d ago First seen · 128 lines · 83 tokens per session scan A c41dec58491e

Subscribe to this mod's changes

Trade Association Meeting Review is a skill published in the GitHub repository zgbrenner/agentcounsel (19 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 83 tokens to every session and 2,701 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

legal-research

A legal research skill for finding and analysing laws and court cases, including similar cases. It requires access to a reliable legal research database before producing a formal report.

code-lawyer/Legal-Agent-Skills · 144 tokens

document-fill

A document-filling assistant that uses a supplied template and case files to fill in forms, contracts, or legal documents. It also reports where each filled value came from and which details are missing.

code-lawyer/Legal-Agent-Skills · 61 tokens

contract-review

A contract-review workflow for agreements governed by Chinese law, United States law, or both. It examines clauses one by one and produces a list of legal-risk questions, with an optional marked-up Word document.

code-lawyer/Legal-Agent-Skills · 86 tokens

fedramp

Expert guidance for FedRAMP certification and compliance under CR26 (FedRAMP Consolidated Rules for 2026). Use this skill whenever a user asks about FedRAMP authorization, ATO (Authority to Operate), cloud security for federal government, NIST SP 800-53 controls, CSP compliance, or any of the core FedRAMP document…

Sushegaad/Claude-Skills-Governance-Risk-and-Compliance · 236 tokens

eu-cra

Expert EU Cyber Resilience Act (CRA) advisor for Regulation (EU) 2024/2847 — mandatory cybersecurity and vulnerability handling requirements for all products with digital elements (PDEs) sold in the EU. Use this skill for gap analysis, product classification (Default / Class I / Class II), conformity assessment route…

Sushegaad/Claude-Skills-Governance-Risk-and-Compliance · 133 tokens

aenderungsvorbehalt-308

Für Änderungsvorbehalt 308: ordnet Norm, Beweislast und Gegenargument; Ergebnis: Prüfprodukt mit Risiko und nächstem Schritt.

Klotzkette/claude-fuer-deutsches-recht · 41 tokens