Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add Zhangs-11/zs-skills --skill coder-style-testgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Zhangs-11/zs-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/zhangs-11/zs-skills/coder-style-test)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/zhangs-11/zs-skills/coder-style-test"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/zhangs-11/zs-skills/coder-style-test/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/zhangs-11/zs-skills/coder-style-test"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/zhangs-11/zs-skills/coder-style-test.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00186 | $0.00769 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00074 | $0.00308 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00037 | $0.00154 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00019 | $0.00077 |
Grade A, and why
coder-style-test scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 17d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
编程风格测试
题目、维度和 16 种类型的文案都在 references/coder-style.json，计分用 scripts/score.py。不要凭记忆出题或改写题目，也不要自己心算结果，一律以这两个文件为准，保证和网页版 https://kakarot-index.kakarot-space.workers.dev/coder-style/ 的结果一致。
流程
1. 出题
读取 references/coder-style.json 的 questions，按原顺序把 20 道题一次性发给用户。每道题写成「题号. 题目」，下面两行是「A. 第一个选项」「B. 第二个选项」，选项顺序和 JSON 里 options 的顺序一致，不能调换。不显示 axis 和 pole 字段，避免用户看出每道题测的是哪一端。
题目前面用一两句话说明：每道题选更接近自己的那一项，没有对错；答完按题号顺序回复 20 个字母，例如 ABBAA BABAB …，中间有空格也行。用户想一道一道地答时，就每次只发一道题，收齐 20 个答案后再计分。
2. 计分
收齐答案后运行：
python3 scripts/score.py "用户的 20 个答案"
脚本会检查答案是否正好 20 个 A 或 B，不合格时报错退出。报错时把错误原因告诉用户，请用户补齐或改正，不要自己猜测缺失的答案。用户的回答里夹杂了文字时，按题号整理出 20 个字母再传给脚本，整理结果不确定就向用户确认。
3. 给出结果
把脚本输出的 Markdown 原样发给用户，不改写文案，不额外加对用户性格的评价。最后一行是网页版结果链接，用户打开后能看到带图表的结果页，也可以发给朋友。
用户追问某个类型、某个方面的含义，或者想看全部 16 种类型时，从 JSON 的 axes 和 types 里取内容回答。
边界
- 这是趣味测试，结果仅供参考和娱乐，不用于招聘、绩效等评价场景。用户要求拿它评价别人时，说明这一点。
- 测试只看用户自己的选择，不读取用户的代码、Git 记录或其他文件。
What ships with it
3 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 17d ago First seen · 38 lines · 186 tokens per session scan A 3043dc81457f
coder-style-test is a skill published in the GitHub repository Zhangs-11/zs-skills (2 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 186 tokens to every session and 769 once invoked, about $0.0007 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-10-11.
Other skills, from other repositories
paper-explainer
A research-content workflow that turns an arXiv paper or a local PDF into an explanation for a video or written article. arXiv is a public online archive of research papers.
scaffold-exercises
A directory scaffold for course exercises, with sections, exercise folders, and optional problem, solution, or explanation versions. It creates the required Markdown files and checks the result with the repository's linter.
learning-notes-automation
A workflow for turning videos, podcasts, and articles into structured learning notes. It extracts key ideas and creates flashcards that can be imported into Anki, a spaced-repetition study app.
teach
A teaching-workspace guide for creating lessons, reference sheets, learning records, and resource notes around a topic the user wants to learn.
scaffold-exercises
A template builder for coding exercises, organized into sections and exercises with problem, solution, and explanation folders. It creates the files and structure expected by the project’s lint checker.
bloom-tutor
An interactive Chinese-language study system that teaches a subject through short documents, questions, and feedback. Each subject is kept in its own folder with a syllabus and learning log.