Getting it into your agent
It runs from inside its repository, so the clone comes first — what it calls does not travel with the file alone.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ZhenyuanPAN822/relationship-candlestick-labnpx agentmods add skills/zhenyuanpan822/relationship-candlestick-lab/skillWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/zhenyuanpan822/relationship-candlestick-lab/skill)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/zhenyuanpan822/relationship-candlestick-lab/skill"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/zhenyuanpan822/relationship-candlestick-lab/skill/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/zhenyuanpan822/relationship-candlestick-lab/skill"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/zhenyuanpan822/relationship-candlestick-lab/skill.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00080 | $0.04865 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00040 | $0.02433 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00016 | $0.00973 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00487 |
Grade A, and why
rcl-score scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 397 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Relationship Candlestick Lab · Scoring Skill (v3.1)
This skill has TWO operating modes. Detect which one you're in by looking at the first user message:
- Entry Mode — user just typed
/rcl-score(or asked you to "score my chat / 画 K 线") with no input file yet. Run the Entry Protocol below. - Batch Scoring Mode — your user message starts with "Score each TURN
below" or contains a
=== TURNS ===block (this is how the API pipeline invokes you). Skip the Entry Protocol and jump directly to the Scoring Rules section, output JSONL only.
⓪ Entry Protocol(仅当用户直接调用 skill 时)
对用户说的话(仅这一段对外输出,Step 1–4 不要复述给用户)
回复用户(中文,简洁,5–8 行以内):
我会把你的聊天记录画成 K 线图,每根 K 线代表一段时间的关系强度变化。
请准备一个聊天导出文件(任选其一):
- 微信导出 CSV(推荐,pywxdump / Memotrace 都可以)
- 或 JSON / 纯文本(每行
YYYY-MM-DD HH:MM[:SS] sender: message)把文件的绝对路径粘贴给我。
⚠️ 模型 / effort 推荐:
- Claude:
Sonnet 4.6+ effortlow- GPT 系列:
GPT-5 / 5.4 / 5.5+ effortlow⏱ 耗时预估:每 1000 条消息约 7 分钟(取决于模型 / effort)。
全程在本地处理,聊天数据不上传云端。
等用户回复文件路径再继续。
Step 1–4(你内部按顺序执行,不需要把命令贴给用户)
Step 1 — CSV → messages.jsonl
<job_name> 用源文件名(去后缀)。
python scripts/wechat_to_standard.py \
--input "<用户给的路径>" \
--output "output/_jobs/<job_name>/messages_standard.csv" \
--me me --them other
然后 Python 把标准 CSV 转 messages.jsonl(每行带 i 索引)。
如果用户给的是 JSON/TXT,改用 python -m relationship_candlestick.cli prepare ...。
Step 2 — 预处理:剔单字 + 聚合 turns
python scripts/preprocess_turns.py \
--input output/_jobs/<job_name>/messages.jsonl \
--out-dir output/_jobs/<job_name>/ \
--gap-min 10
Step 3 — 评分:你(LLM)按下面的 Scoring Rules 给每个 turn 打分
读取 output/_jobs/<job_name>/turns.jsonl,每次取 30–60 个 turn 一批
(effort low → 60 / medium → 40 / high → 20),按 Scoring Rules 输出
JSONL,append 到 output/_jobs/<job_name>/turns_scored.jsonl。
🚫 这一步绝对不要做的事(重要):
- 不要给用户出"A / B / C"菜单让他选打分方式。 Skill 触发后就只有一条路:你(IDE 里的 LLM)从头到尾把 turns 全部打完。没有分叉。
- 不要把
scripts/score_turns_api.py作为选项推荐给用户。 那个脚本是给"不走 skill"的 API 模式用户的,与 skill 用户无关。即使 repo 里能看到它,也当它不存在。 - 不要因为 turn 数多就停下来问"要不要继续"。 500、1000、2000 turns 都按 effort 自动分批往下打,不要中途请示。如果担心耗时,启动前已经在 Entry Protocol 里告知"每 1000 条 ~7 分钟"——用户已经知道。
- 不要因为"会吃当前会话上下文"就推荐用户换流程。 这就是 skill 的设计——上下文够用,旧批次的 JSONL 输出可以丢,框架靠
i重新拼。 - 不要在打分中途总结"已经打了 X 批,剩下 Y 批,要不要继续"。 闷头打完再说话。
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago First seen · 397 lines · 80 tokens per session scan A 35183bd8c6ab
rcl-score is a skill published in the GitHub repository ZhenyuanPAN822/relationship-candlestick-lab (84 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 80 tokens to every session and 4,865 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
shortfilm-prompt
Generate cinematic AI shortfilm prompts (works with Seedance 2.0, Xiaoyunque, Sora, Kling, Jimeng, Veo) using the 5-stage structure from Mx-Shell's Zombie Scavenger. Trigger when the user wants transformation sequences, multi-shot narrative shorts, weapon-charge/combat segments, emotional family/pet/farewell…
simp
A relationship-advice skill that helps interpret signals, plan respectful approaches, and write sincere messages for someone you like.
chinese-write-checker
A Chinese-language review process for checking an article from an editor's, reader's, writer's, and publishing platform's viewpoints.
packaging-workshop
A final presentation review for finished Chinese content. It works on the title, opening, layout, punctuation, images, and platform format without changing the main body.
editor-revisor
A Chinese-language editing assistant that finds unnecessary words, formulaic openings, forced parallel phrasing, and slogan-like endings. It offers a deletion-focused mode and a fuller rewriting mode for any draft.
voice-dissolver
A writing-analysis skill that identifies the author's real voice before any rewriting. It marks distinctive passages to preserve and can ask questions to clarify the intended feeling, stance, and audience.