Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to zhmxiaowo/opencode-simple. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/zhmxiaowo/opencode-simple/main/.opencode/skills/verification-loop/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/zhmxiaowo/opencode-simpleWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/zhmxiaowo/opencode-simple/verification-loop)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/zhmxiaowo/opencode-simple/verification-loop"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/zhmxiaowo/opencode-simple/verification-loop/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/zhmxiaowo/opencode-simple/verification-loop"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/zhmxiaowo/opencode-simple/verification-loop.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00025 | $0.00778 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00311 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00156 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00078 |
Grade A, and why
verification-loop scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 129 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
CDD Verification Loop Skill
A compile-driven verification system. 不运行任何测试。唯一的验证标准是编译通过 + LSP 无 Error。
When to Use
Invoke this skill:
- After completing a feature or significant code change
- Before creating a PR
- When you want to ensure compile gates pass
- After refactoring
Verification Phases
Phase 1: Build / Compile Verification
自动检测项目类型并运行对应命令:
# TypeScript/Node.js
npx tsc --noEmit --pretty 2>&1 | head -30
# OR npm run build / pnpm build
# C# / Unity
dotnet build --no-restore 2>&1 | tail -20
# C++ / Unreal / CMake
cmake --build build/ 2>&1 | tail -20
# Rust
cargo check 2>&1 | tail -20
# Go
go build ./... 2>&1 | tail -20
# Python (type check)
pyright . 2>&1 | head -30
If build fails:
- STOP — do not proceed
- Invoke
sequential-thinkingfor root cause analysis - Use build-error-resolver agent to fix
- Re-run compile until Exit Code 0
Phase 2: LSP Diagnostics Check
Use mcp-language-server to verify:
- 0 Error-level diagnostics
- Review Warning-level diagnostics (optional fix)
Phase 3: Lint Check
# JavaScript/TypeScript
npm run lint 2>&1 | head -30
# Python
ruff check . 2>&1 | head -30
Phase 4: Security Scan
# Check for secrets
grep -rn "sk-" --include="*.ts" --include="*.js" --include="*.cs" . 2>/dev/null | head -10
grep -rn "api_key" --include="*.ts" --include="*.js" --include="*.cs" . 2>/dev/null | head -10
# Check for debug logging
grep -rn "console.log\|Debug.Log\|UE_LOG" src/ 2>/dev/null | head -10
Phase 5: Diff Review
# Show what changed
git diff --stat
git diff HEAD~1 --name-only
Review each changed file for:
- Unintended changes
- Missing error handling
- Potential edge cases
Output Format
After running all phases, produce a CDD verification report:
CDD VERIFICATION REPORT
=======================
Compile: [PASS/FAIL] (Exit Code: X)
Types/LSP: [PASS/FAIL] (X errors)
Lint: [PASS/FAIL] (X warnings)
Security: [PASS/FAIL] (X issues)
Diff: [X files changed]
Overall: [READY/NOT READY] for PR
Issues to Fix:
1. ...
2. ...
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 129 lines · 25 tokens per session scan A 75e431ca3f18
verification-loop is a skill published in the GitHub repository zhmxiaowo/opencode-simple (2 stars, last pushed 7mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 25 tokens to every session and 778 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
debug-optimize-lcp
Guides debugging and optimizing Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) using Chrome DevTools MCP tools. Use this skill whenever the user asks about LCP performance, slow page loads, Core Web Vitals optimization, or wants to understand why their page's main content takes too long to appear. Also use when the user mentions…
systematic-debugging
Use when debugging a failing test, build error, or runtime issue that isn't immediately obvious. Guides a 4-phase root cause analysis instead of random fix attempts.
diagnose
Trace from a reproduced symptom to the source code that causes it. Pin the specific file and approximate line, rate confidence in the cause and clarity of the fix independently, and always propose a concrete fix.
repro-admin
Reproduce an EmDash admin UI bug. Attach a container, start the demo dev server, drive the admin with agent-browser using the dev-bypass session, and capture the reproduction as screenshots plus a replayable transcript.
log-error-digest
Analyze log files to troubleshoot errors, identify peak error periods, and produce error clustering, frequency statistics, and time distribution reports. Supports JSON, syslog, and Nginx formats with automatic detection. Use when a user uploads a .log file and asks to analyze errors, find patterns, debug issues, or…
deck-retro
Run a fully local agent-deck retrospective over the user's own transcripts, Recall index and logs. Use when a user wants to find recurring failures or take their own finding from investigation through synthetic reproduction, a user-filed issue, a test-first fix and contributor PR handoff. Also use for weekly usage…