Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/zhmxiaowo/opencode-simple/verification-loopnpx skills add zhmxiaowo/opencode-simple --skill verification-loopgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/zhmxiaowo/opencode-simpleWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00025 | $0.00778 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00013 | $0.00389 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00005 | $0.00156 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00078 |
Grade A, and why
verification-loop scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 129 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
CDD Verification Loop Skill
A compile-driven verification system. 不运行任何测试。唯一的验证标准是编译通过 + LSP 无 Error。
When to Use
Invoke this skill:
- After completing a feature or significant code change
- Before creating a PR
- When you want to ensure compile gates pass
- After refactoring
Verification Phases
Phase 1: Build / Compile Verification
自动检测项目类型并运行对应命令:
# TypeScript/Node.js
npx tsc --noEmit --pretty 2>&1 | head -30
# OR npm run build / pnpm build
# C# / Unity
dotnet build --no-restore 2>&1 | tail -20
# C++ / Unreal / CMake
cmake --build build/ 2>&1 | tail -20
# Rust
cargo check 2>&1 | tail -20
# Go
go build ./... 2>&1 | tail -20
# Python (type check)
pyright . 2>&1 | head -30
If build fails:
- STOP — do not proceed
- Invoke
sequential-thinkingfor root cause analysis - Use build-error-resolver agent to fix
- Re-run compile until Exit Code 0
Phase 2: LSP Diagnostics Check
Use mcp-language-server to verify:
- 0 Error-level diagnostics
- Review Warning-level diagnostics (optional fix)
Phase 3: Lint Check
# JavaScript/TypeScript
npm run lint 2>&1 | head -30
# Python
ruff check . 2>&1 | head -30
Phase 4: Security Scan
# Check for secrets
grep -rn "sk-" --include="*.ts" --include="*.js" --include="*.cs" . 2>/dev/null | head -10
grep -rn "api_key" --include="*.ts" --include="*.js" --include="*.cs" . 2>/dev/null | head -10
# Check for debug logging
grep -rn "console.log\|Debug.Log\|UE_LOG" src/ 2>/dev/null | head -10
Phase 5: Diff Review
# Show what changed
git diff --stat
git diff HEAD~1 --name-only
Review each changed file for:
- Unintended changes
- Missing error handling
- Potential edge cases
Output Format
After running all phases, produce a CDD verification report:
CDD VERIFICATION REPORT
=======================
Compile: [PASS/FAIL] (Exit Code: X)
Types/LSP: [PASS/FAIL] (X errors)
Lint: [PASS/FAIL] (X warnings)
Security: [PASS/FAIL] (X issues)
Diff: [X files changed]
Overall: [READY/NOT READY] for PR
Issues to Fix:
1. ...
2. ...
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 129 lines · 25 tokens per session scan A 75e431ca3f18
verification-loop is a skill published in the GitHub repository zhmxiaowo/opencode-simple (2 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 25 tokens to every session and 778 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
systematic-debugging
Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.
brainstorming
You MUST use this before any creative work - creating features, building components, adding functionality, or modifying behavior. Explores user intent, requirements and design before implementation.
chat-pet-sprite-creation
Use when creating or changing VS Code chat pet sprite art, sprite sheets, state animations, eye treatments, Stable/Insiders variants, or pet transitions under src/vs/workbench/contrib/chat/browser/widget/media/chatPet.
cpu-profile-analysis
Analyze V8/Chrome CPU profiles (.cpuprofile) and DevTools trace files (Trace-.json). Use when: profiling performance, investigating slow functions, comparing code paths, finding bottlenecks, analyzing timeToRequest, understanding call trees from sampling profiler data, analyzing layout/paint/rendering, investigating…
agent-host-chat-contributions
Build and review cross-cutting agent-host chat behavior through lifecycle contributions. Use when adding turn lifecycle side effects, prompt or context injection, restored-history transformation, protocol-action observation, or when reviewing changes that add code to AgentSideEffects or AgentService.
auto-perf-optimize
Run agent-driven VS Code performance or memory investigations. Use when asked to launch Code OSS, automate a VS Code scenario, run the Chat memory smoke runner, capture renderer heap snapshots, take workflow screenshots, compare run summaries, or drive a repeatable scenario before heap-snapshot analysis.