Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add zhou210712/claude-for-legal-ZH --skill commentsgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/zhou210712/claude-for-legal-ZHWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/zhou210712/claude-for-legal-zh/comments)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/zhou210712/claude-for-legal-zh/comments"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/zhou210712/claude-for-legal-zh/comments/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/zhou210712/claude-for-legal-zh/comments"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/zhou210712/claude-for-legal-zh/comments.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00065 | $0.00724 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00026 | $0.00290 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00013 | $0.00145 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00072 |
Grade A, and why
comments scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
/comments
目的
征求意见稿有截止日期。是否提交反馈意见是律师的决定——但截止日期在未被记录决策的情况下悄然消失才是风险。此技能呈现开放的征求意见期并记录决策。
加载上下文
~/.claude/plugins/config/claude-for-legal/regulatory-legal/comment-tracker.yaml → 所有已跟踪的征求意见稿及其状态。
~/.claude/plugins/config/claude-for-legal/regulatory-legal/CLAUDE.md → 默认意见征集决策负责人。
默认视图——开放的征求意见期
## 意见征集跟踪器 — [日期]
### ⏰ 14天内截止
| ID | 法规 | 截止日期 | 剩余天数 | 决策 | 负责人 |
|----|------|----------|----------|------|--------|
| CMT-001 | [名称] | [日期] | [N] | 待决定 | [负责人] |
### 🟡 开放(>14天)
[同上表]
### 最近已决定
| ID | 法规 | 决策 | 理由 |
|----|------|------|------|
| CMT-002 | [名称] | 不提交 | [理由] |
---
**总开放数:** [N] **30天内截止且待决定:** [N]
记录决策
/regulatory-legal:comments --decide CMT-001
决策:[提交 / 不提交 / 放弃]
理由:"[简要——如'该法规不适用于我们的业务模式'或'就第3条提交意见']"
更新跟踪器。如果决策为"提交":提示设置提交截止日期提醒(征求意见截止日期前至少5个工作日供内部审阅)。
通知
首次检测到征求意见稿时(由 reg-feed-watcher 填充):向意见征集决策负责人发送通知(如企业通讯工具已配置且 owner_contact 已设置)。
截止日期前14天提醒(如决策仍为"待决定")。 截止日期前3天提醒(如仍待决定)——升级紧急度。
comment-decision的gap_type语义、逐次发送确认规则和 comment-tracker.yaml 的 schema 位于 gap-surfacer 参考技能中——在实质工作前加载。
本技能不做的事
- 不起草意见书。那是独立的律师任务。
- 不做出提交决策。它跟踪决策;律师做出决策。
- 不监测征集后的活动。一旦决策已记录,此跟踪器的工作就完成了——通过
/regulatory-legal:reg-feed-watcher跟踪规则的后续进展。
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 70 lines · 65 tokens per session scan A e2ba723ceebe
comments is a skill published in the GitHub repository zhou210712/claude-for-legal-ZH (238 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 65 tokens to every session and 724 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
vendor-review
Evaluate a vendor — cost analysis, risk assessment, and recommendation. Use when reviewing a new vendor proposal, deciding whether to renew or replace a contract, comparing two vendors side-by-side, or building a TCO breakdown and negotiation points before procurement sign-off.
integration-management
Post-closing M&A integration tracker — phased workplan, consent tracking, contract assignment at scale, weekly status reports. Initializes from whatever deal artifacts are available (purchase agreement, deal summary, closing checklist) and connects to deal-context.md and closing-checklist.yaml from the M&A cold-start.…
entity-compliance
Entity compliance tracker — initialize, report upcoming deadlines, update status, run health audit, export to CSV. Maintains a compliance-tracker.yaml built from the entity table, calculates filing deadlines by entity and jurisdiction, and surfaces what's due in the next 30/60/90 days. Use when user says "entity…
portfolio
Track the IP portfolio — registrations, renewals, maintenance fees, and use declarations. Use when checking what's renewing, adding or updating an asset, recording a maintenance filing, or auditing the register for gaps, lapses, and use-in-commerce questions. Receives handoffs from prosecution and clearance work.
launch-review
Full launch review against your framework and risk calibration. Use when the user says "review this launch", "legal review for [feature]", "can we ship this", "what are the legal issues with [product]", or references a launch tracker ticket or PRD that needs a category-by-category review memo.
client-intake
Structured intake — practice-area templates, cross-area issue spotting, conflict flags, and triage classification. Produces a formatted case summary the student analyzes and the professor reviews. Does NOT decide case acceptance. Use when starting a new client intake, running an intake interview, or writing up a new…