entity-compliance

entity-compliance is a skill for Claude Code from zhou210712/claude-for-legal-ZH. It costs 114 tokens per session (5,334 once invoked), scanned A, a copy of ai-tool-handoff, Apache-2.0.

A tracker for regulatory filings and deadlines for registered business entities, organised by entity type and place of registration. It can report upcoming or overdue items, update statuses, audit the tracker, and export the results.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to initialise a compliance calendar, review filings due in the next 30, 60, or 90 days, update filing status, audit records, and create a CSV export.
Why use it?
It keeps different entities' filing schedules in one place and reduces the risk of overlooking a deadline that varies by entity or jurisdiction.

Skill for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: argument-hint in frontmatter. Also seen: reads .claude/ paths; mentions CLAUDE.md.

Part of the corporate-legal plugin — 10 skills, 1 agent shipped together

Good fit Use it to initialise a compliance calendar, review filings due in the next 30, 60, or 90 days, update filing status, audit records, and create a CSV export.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/zhou210712/claude-for-legal-zh/entity-compliance
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add zhou210712/claude-for-legal-ZH --skill entity-compliance
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/zhou210712/claude-for-legal-ZH

Made for: Claude Code.

Or install corporate-legal, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 10 skills, 1 agent.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for entity-compliance

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/zhou210712/claude-for-legal-zh/entity-compliance/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/zhou210712/claude-for-legal-zh/entity-compliance)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/zhou210712/claude-for-legal-zh/entity-compliance"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/zhou210712/claude-for-legal-zh/entity-compliance/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for entity-compliance

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/zhou210712/claude-for-legal-zh/entity-compliance"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/zhou210712/claude-for-legal-zh/entity-compliance.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 114 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 5,334 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin 81% copy Near-identical to another mod in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00114 $0.05334
Opus 5 $0.00057 $0.02667
Sonnet 5 $0.00023 $0.01067
Haiku 4.5 $0.00011 $0.00533

Measured 12d ago against content hash cfca76302d28, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-12, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

entity-compliance scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

Origin

This is a copy

81% identical to ai-tool-handoff — 431 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.

corporate-legal/skills/entity-compliance/SKILL.md · 404 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 404 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

/entity-compliance

  1. 加载 ~/.claude/plugins/config/claude-for-legal/corporate-legal/CLAUDE.md## 主体管理(主体清单、注册地、工商登记代办机构)。
  2. 按以下标志路由到正确的模式:
    • 无标志或 --init:模式1——从主体清单初始化追踪器
    • --report:模式2——呈现即将到来的截止日和逾期项
    • --update:模式3a(手动)或 3b(--from-report 上传)——更新状态
    • --sweep:模式3c——逐项排查未知/逾期项
    • --audit:模式4——全面健康审计
    • --export:模式5——产出 CSV 或表格导出
  3. 读取/写入 ~/.claude/plugins/config/claude-for-legal/corporate-legal/entities/compliance-tracker.yaml
  4. 任何更新后:展示变更摘要和下一步行动。

目的

工商年报、企业所得税年度申报、信息公示、两年度申报——每个主体在每个注册地有自己的时间安排和错过截止日的各自后果。本技能维护一个单一的 YAML 追踪器,知道什么到期、何时到期、针对哪个主体。有意设计为轻量级:追踪器是你拥有的文件,Claude 按指令更新,需要分享时你导出。

重要:截止日参考说明

本技能参考表中的申报截止日反映了该技能构建日期时公开可得的要求。注册地申报要求和截止日可能会变化。在依赖它们进行合规前,始终与你的工商登记代办机构或直接向相关市场监督管理局确认截止日。 如果你使用工商登记代办机构(如各地的企业登记代理服务机构),它们的合规日历对你的特定主体具有权威性——使用本追踪器组织和呈现它们的数据,而非替代它们。

注册地假设

本追踪器按每个主体记录的设立地或经营地计算截止日。申报规则、截止日机制和费用结构在不同注册地之间存在实质性差异。如果主体的实际业务范围与 ~/.claude/plugins/config/claude-for-legal/corporate-legal/CLAUDE.md 中记录的不同(未披露的外地经营备案、已注销主体、注册地迁移、由本地代理机构管理的跨省级申报),输出可能不完全适用——与工商登记代办机构或该辖区的当地律师确认。

主体类型区分

申报日历取决于主体类型,而不仅仅是注册地。将所有"某地主体"视为同一类别是常见且后果严重的错误——有限公司、股份公司、合伙企业、个人独资企业有不同的申报要求、不同的截止日和错过申报的不同后果。在计算或报告截止日前从主体清单中确认主体类型,绝不将一个主体类型的截止日复制到同一注册地的另一个主体类型。

中国法下关键区别:

  • 有限责任公司/股份有限公司: 须于每年1月1日至6月30日通过国家企业信用信息公示系统报送并公示年度报告。法律依据:国务院《企业信息公示暂行条例》第7、8条 [法条原文]
  • 外商投资企业: 除年报外,还需根据《外商投资法》及其实施细则完成外商投资信息报告。法律依据:《外商投资法》第34条 [法条原文]
  • 合伙企业: 须于每年1月1日至6月30日报送年度报告,但合伙企业年度报告的内容与公司不同。
  • 代表处/分公司: 各自有独立的年报义务。
  • 已进入注销程序或长期停业的主体: 仍需报送年报(但清算组成员、清算组负责人名单等需在清算组成立后60日内公示)。

如果主体清单中记录了一个主体但没有类型,将其标记为 type_unknown,在计算任何截止日前请用户确认。


追踪器文件

存放于 ~/.claude/plugins/config/claude-for-legal/corporate-legal/entities/compliance-tracker.yaml。结构:

# 主体合规追踪器
# 生成日期:[日期]
# 最近更新:[日期]
# 声明:截止日为参考信息——请与工商登记代办机构或市场监督管理局确认

metadata:
  company: "[公司名称]"
  generated: "[日期]"
  last_updated: "[日期]"
  last_audit: "[日期 或 空]"

custom_jurisdictions:   # 手动添加——不在内置参考表中的省份或国家
  []                    # 遇到新的注册地时填充

entities:
  - name: "[主体名称]"
    type: "[有限责任公司 / 股份有限公司 / 合伙企业 / 其他]"
    registration_place: "[省份/城市]"
    formation_date: "[日期 或 空]"
    status: "[开业 / 休眠 / 注销中]"
    registered_agent: "[工商登记代办机构名称 / 内部自行管理 / 其他]"
    notes: ""

    jurisdictions:
      - place: "[省份/城市]"
        qualification: "[注册地 / 经营地]"
        qualified_date: "[日期 或 空]"
        agent_managed: false   # 对由本地代理机构处理合规的主体设为 true
        local_agent: "[名称 或 空]"
        filings:
          - type: "[年度报告 / 企业所得税申报 / 外商投资信息报告 / 其他]"
            due_date: "[YYYY-MM-DD]"
            due_basis: "[固定日期 / 周年月 / 其他]"
            last_filed: "[日期 或 空]"
            last_fee: "[金额 或 空]"
            status: "[current / due_soon / overdue / unknown]"
            confirmed_good_standing: "[日期 或 空]"
            notes: ""

Read the full file on GitHub · 404 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 12d ago First seen · 404 lines · 114 tokens per session scan A cfca76302d28

Subscribe to this mod's changes

entity-compliance is a skill published in the GitHub repository zhou210712/claude-for-legal-ZH (212 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 114 tokens to every session and 5,334 once invoked, about $0.0006 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 81% identical to ai-tool-handoff, differing in 431 lines, and is treated as a copy.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

specification-writing

A workflow for writing complete patent specifications from patent claims and an invention disclosure. It adapts the document to a chosen jurisdiction, such as the US, Europe, or China.

wanshuiyin/Auto-claude-code-research-in-sleep · 49 tokens

regulatory-research-fallback

Fallback workflow for regulatory research when web extraction tools fail on government PDFs.

HKUDS/OpenSpace · 20 tokens

x-scorecard

OpenSSF Scorecard for assessing open source project security. Check security best practices and compliance. Dependency: This is an x-cmd module. Install x-cmd first (see x-cmd skill for installation options). see x-cmd skill for installation.

x-cmd/x-cmd · 57 tokens

gesellschaftsrechtliche-satzungen-agb

Für Gesellschaftsrechtliche Satzungen AGB Abgrenzung: ordnet Norm, Beweislast und Gegenargument; Ergebnis: Prüfprodukt mit Risiko und nächstem Schritt. Fachgebiet: AGB-Recht-Prüfer. Route: gesellschaftsrechtliche-satzungen-agb.

Klotzkette/claude-fuer-deutsches-recht · 69 tokens

memstack-business-gdpr

Use this skill when the user says 'GDPR', 'data protection', 'privacy compliance', 'DPA', 'DSAR', 'data subject request', 'cookie consent', 'privacy audit', 'CCPA', or asks 'do I need GDPR for this repo'. Scans the repository to detect what personal data is collected, classifies sensitivity, determines whether GDPR…

cwinvestments/memstack · 121 tokens

nda-review

Use when the user uploads or pastes a non-disclosure agreement and asks for review, redline, risk assessment, or a recommendation on whether to sign. Identifies missing standard protections, one-sided or unusual provisions, and operational issues; produces a structured report with severity ratings and citations to…

LegalQuants/lq-ai · 79 tokens