Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add zhou210712/claude-for-legal-ZH --skill handbook-updatesgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/zhou210712/claude-for-legal-ZHWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/zhou210712/claude-for-legal-zh/handbook-updates)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/zhou210712/claude-for-legal-zh/handbook-updates"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/zhou210712/claude-for-legal-zh/handbook-updates/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/zhou210712/claude-for-legal-zh/handbook-updates"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/zhou210712/claude-for-legal-zh/handbook-updates.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00074 | $0.01107 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00037 | $0.00553 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00015 | $0.00221 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00111 |
Grade A, and why
handbook-updates scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Handbook Updates(规章制度更新)
案件上下文
案件上下文。 检查实务级 CLAUDE.md 中的 ## Matter workspaces。如果 Enabled 为 ✗(法务用户默认值),跳过本段——技能使用实务级上下文,案件机制不可见。如果已启用且无活跃案件,询问:"这是哪个案件的?运行 /employment-legal:matter-workspace switch <slug> 或说 practice-level。" 加载活跃案件的 matter.md 获取案件特定上下文和覆盖项。将输出写入案件文件夹。除非 Cross-matter context 为 on,否则不得读取其他案件的文件。
目的
规章制度变更具有连锁影响。修改考勤制度,你就影响了加班费计算引述、假期制度的交叉引用和三份省级补充条款。本技能在连锁反应变成不一致之前找到它们。
加载上下文
~/.claude/plugins/config/claude-for-legal/employment-legal/CLAUDE.md → 规章制度位置、省级补充条款列表、更新频率。
工作流
步骤1:获取变更
- 哪个章节在变更?
- 新表述是什么?
- 为什么?(法律要求、制度决策、清理)
步骤2:与现行版本 diff
读取现行规章制度相关章节。显示 diff:
- [旧表述]
+ [新表述]
步骤3:查找交叉引用
在规章制度中搜索引用被变更章节的内容:
- 引用本制度的其他制度("关于年休假天数,见休假管理制度")
- 本章节使用或定义的术语
- 修改本章节的省级补充条款
每个交叉引用:变更后是否仍然合理?标记任何断裂的引用。
步骤4:省级补充条款影响
对于 ~/.claude/plugins/config/claude-for-legal/employment-legal/CLAUDE.md 中的每个省/直辖市补充条款:
- 该补充条款是否修改正在变更的章节?
- 变更是否使补充条款过时、错误或不完整?
- 变更是否对之前不需要补充的省/直辖市产生了新的补充需求?
《劳动合同法》第4条合规提醒。 涉及劳动者切身利益的规章制度变更,须经职工代表大会或者全体职工讨论,提出方案和意见,与工会或者职工代表平等协商确定,并公示或告知劳动者。[法条原文]
步骤5:承诺检查
变更是否减少了旧版本承诺的内容?
如果是:存在风险。规章制度中的承诺可能在劳动争议中被司法机关引用。减少福利可能需要的不只是更新文件——事先通知、协商程序,且在部分地区不能溯及既往。
标记。不阻止——但标记。
输出
## 规章制度更新:[章节名称]
### 变更
[diff]
### 交叉引用影响
| 章节 | 引用被变更章节 | 仍然准确? | 需要修复 |
|---|---|---|---|
| [名称] | [如何引用] | ✅/⚠️ | [内容] |
### 省级补充条款影响
| 省/直辖市 | 现行补充 | 变更后 | 行动 |
|---|---|---|---|
| [省/直辖市] | [内容] | [仍然有效 / 过时 / 需要更新] | [无 / 更新 / 需要新补充] |
### 承诺检查
[如果减少福利:标记 + 管辖地风险说明]
### 准备发布
- [ ] 交叉引用已更新
- [ ] 省级补充条款已更新
- [ ] [如减少福利:通知/协商已处理]
- [ ] 版本号和日期已更新
- [ ] 民主程序和公示流程已完成(《劳动合同法》第4条 `[法条原文]`)
本技能不做什么
- 批准规章制度变更。由 HR/法务负责人决策。
- 向员工传达变更。
- 追踪签收确认。
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 109 lines · 74 tokens per session scan A 82e42ddfc67a
handbook-updates is a skill published in the GitHub repository zhou210712/claude-for-legal-ZH (212 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 74 tokens to every session and 1,107 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
specification-writing
A workflow for writing complete patent specifications from patent claims and an invention disclosure. It adapts the document to a chosen jurisdiction, such as the US, Europe, or China.
regulatory-research-fallback
Fallback workflow for regulatory research when web extraction tools fail on government PDFs.
x-scorecard
OpenSSF Scorecard for assessing open source project security. Check security best practices and compliance. Dependency: This is an x-cmd module. Install x-cmd first (see x-cmd skill for installation options). see x-cmd skill for installation.
gesellschaftsrechtliche-satzungen-agb
Für Gesellschaftsrechtliche Satzungen AGB Abgrenzung: ordnet Norm, Beweislast und Gegenargument; Ergebnis: Prüfprodukt mit Risiko und nächstem Schritt. Fachgebiet: AGB-Recht-Prüfer. Route: gesellschaftsrechtliche-satzungen-agb.
memstack-business-gdpr
Use this skill when the user says 'GDPR', 'data protection', 'privacy compliance', 'DPA', 'DSAR', 'data subject request', 'cookie consent', 'privacy audit', 'CCPA', or asks 'do I need GDPR for this repo'. Scans the repository to detect what personal data is collected, classifies sensitivity, determines whether GDPR…
nda-review
Use when the user uploads or pastes a non-disclosure agreement and asks for review, redline, risk assessment, or a recommendation on whether to sign. Identifies missing standard protections, one-sided or unusual provisions, and operational issues; produces a structured report with severity ratings and citations to…