Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add zhou210712/claude-for-legal-ZH --skill ip-clause-reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/zhou210712/claude-for-legal-ZHWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/zhou210712/claude-for-legal-zh/ip-clause-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/zhou210712/claude-for-legal-zh/ip-clause-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/zhou210712/claude-for-legal-zh/ip-clause-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/zhou210712/claude-for-legal-zh/ip-clause-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/zhou210712/claude-for-legal-zh/ip-clause-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00084 | $0.04914 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00042 | $0.02457 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00017 | $0.00983 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00491 |
Grade A, and why
ip-clause-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 281 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
/ip-clause-review
对照 ~/.claude/plugins/config/claude-for-legal/ip-legal/CLAUDE.md 中的实务画像审查协议中的知识产权条款。
标注权利归属缺陷、所有权模糊、许可范围问题及知识产权保证/赔偿问题。
生成按风险排序的逐条审查备忘录,附建议修改语言。
使用说明
-
加载
~/.claude/plugins/config/claude-for-legal/ip-legal/CLAUDE.md。 如含占位符,停止并提示:"先运行/ip-legal:cold-start-interview——在审查知识产权条款前,我需要了解你的实务画像。" -
获取协议: 从文件路径、网盘链接或粘贴文本。如未提供,询问。
-
按以下工作流执行。 特别是:
- 确定协议类型及公司在知识产权上的立场(授权方/接受方/双方)。立场问题按单份文件判断,非一次性设置。
- 如协议为劳动合同、顾问协议、SOW或职务作品文件,优先执行权利归属缺陷检查。
- 按风险优先级生成逐条审查意见。
- 检查跨条款一致性,不仅逐条审查。
- 标注管辖影响(著作人身权、职务作品、默示许可、专利赔偿)。
-
按以下模板输出备忘录 — 工作成果页眉居首、底线结论、权利归属缺陷检查、按严重程度分组的条款、一致性标注、管辖提示、审批路由。
-
尊重决策立场。 当某条款可被解读为以任一方式分配知识产权时,标注供律师审查并展示各方有利因素。对主观分配问题绝不沉默决定。
示例
/ip-legal:ip-clause-review ~/Documents/供应商-SOW.pdf
/ip-legal:ip-clause-review https://docs.google.com/document/d/...
/ip-legal:ip-clause-review
事项上下文
事项上下文。 检查实务级 CLAUDE.md 中的 ## 事项工作区。如 Enabled 为 ✗(法务用户的默认状态),跳过本段其余内容——各技能使用实务级上下文,事项机制不可见。如已启用且无活跃事项,询问:"此事项属于哪个案件?运行 /ip-legal:matter-workspace switch <slug> 或回复 实务级。"加载活跃事项的 matter.md 获取事项特定上下文和覆盖设置。将输出写入事项文件夹 ~/.claude/plugins/config/claude-for-legal/ip-legal/matters/<事项slug>/。除非 跨事项上下文 开启,否则绝不读取其他事项的文件。
目的
阅读协议中的知识产权条款,告诉律师每一条款的作用、与市场惯例或团队标准立场的偏差、风险是什么及——适当时——具体的修改建议。目标是生成律师可一次性采纳的备忘录。
大多数协议中赌注最高的条款是知识产权归属和权利转让。 修复起来极其困难。劳动合同或顾问协议中的权利转让缺陷会在并购尽调、融资和诉讼中暴露出来,有时甚至是在协议签署多年之后。如本应具备的转让语言薄弱或缺失,在备忘录顶部响亮地标注——不得作为普通一项淹没在众多项目中。
前置条件:加载实务画像
阅读协议前,先读取 ~/.claude/plugins/config/claude-for-legal/ip-legal/CLAUDE.md。 如缺失或仍含占位符,停止并运行 /ip-legal:cold-start-interview。实务画像告诉你:
- 管辖范围 — 影响著作人身权放弃是否可强制执行、职务作品规则是否适用、默示转让能否填补空白、许可授予可以多宽泛
- 谁在什么严重程度批准偏差
- 附加在输出上的工作成果页眉
工作流
第一步:定位
快速通读整个协议。回答:
| 问题 | 回答 |
|---|---|
| 这是什么类型的协议? | 劳动合同 / 顾问协议或SOW / 供应商主协议 / 授权入 / 授权出 / 合作协议或联合开发 / 和解协议 / 收购或资产购买 / 其他 |
| 我们在知识产权上的立场? | 授予权利或接收权利 / 转让知识产权或获取知识产权 / 许可人或被许可人 |
| 相对方是谁? | 名称及专业程度 — 个人、初创公司、大型企业 |
| 是否为知识产权专门支付对价? | 工资、费用、版税、预付、股权、无 |
| 管辖法律和审判地 | 协议如何约定 — 我们的实务画像是否将该管辖标注为升级/永不接受? |
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 281 lines · 84 tokens per session scan A 1909ed827811
ip-clause-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository zhou210712/claude-for-legal-ZH (212 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 84 tokens to every session and 4,914 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
specification-writing
A workflow for writing complete patent specifications from patent claims and an invention disclosure. It adapts the document to a chosen jurisdiction, such as the US, Europe, or China.
regulatory-research-fallback
Fallback workflow for regulatory research when web extraction tools fail on government PDFs.
x-scorecard
OpenSSF Scorecard for assessing open source project security. Check security best practices and compliance. Dependency: This is an x-cmd module. Install x-cmd first (see x-cmd skill for installation options). see x-cmd skill for installation.
gesellschaftsrechtliche-satzungen-agb
Für Gesellschaftsrechtliche Satzungen AGB Abgrenzung: ordnet Norm, Beweislast und Gegenargument; Ergebnis: Prüfprodukt mit Risiko und nächstem Schritt. Fachgebiet: AGB-Recht-Prüfer. Route: gesellschaftsrechtliche-satzungen-agb.
memstack-business-gdpr
Use this skill when the user says 'GDPR', 'data protection', 'privacy compliance', 'DPA', 'DSAR', 'data subject request', 'cookie consent', 'privacy audit', 'CCPA', or asks 'do I need GDPR for this repo'. Scans the repository to detect what personal data is collected, classifies sensitivity, determines whether GDPR…
nda-review
Use when the user uploads or pastes a non-disclosure agreement and asks for review, redline, risk assessment, or a recommendation on whether to sign. Identifies missing standard protections, one-sided or unusual provisions, and operational issues; produces a structured report with severity ratings and citations to…