Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add zhou210712/claude-for-legal-ZH --skill matter-briefinggit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/zhou210712/claude-for-legal-ZHWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/zhou210712/claude-for-legal-zh/matter-briefing)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/zhou210712/claude-for-legal-zh/matter-briefing"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/zhou210712/claude-for-legal-zh/matter-briefing/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/zhou210712/claude-for-legal-zh/matter-briefing"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/zhou210712/claude-for-legal-zh/matter-briefing.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00078 | $0.01338 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00039 | $0.00669 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00016 | $0.00268 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00134 |
Grade A, and why
matter-briefing scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
84% identical to chronology — 167 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 113 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
/matter-briefing
- 加载
~/.claude/plugins/config/claude-for-legal/litigation-legal/CLAUDE.md→ 风险校准 + 相关方。 - 按以下工作流操作。
- 读取
~/.claude/plugins/config/claude-for-legal/litigation-legal/matters/[slug]/matter.md+~/.claude/plugins/config/claude-for-legal/litigation-legal/matters/[slug]/history.md+_log.yaml中的日志行。 - 生成简报:当前姿态、自上次更新以来的变化、下个节点、待解决问题、风险重评估检查("
risk:字段是否仍反映实际情况?")。 - 标注陈旧度:如
last_updated> 30天,明确说明。
案件简报
目的
让律师在走向会议室的路上就能读完一个案件的情况。当前姿态、变化之处、下一步做什么、什么值得重新考虑。
加载上下文
~/.claude/plugins/config/claude-for-legal/litigation-legal/matters/_log.yaml—— 结构化行~/.claude/plugins/config/claude-for-legal/litigation-legal/matters/[slug]/matter.md—— 记述式登记~/.claude/plugins/config/claude-for-legal/litigation-legal/matters/[slug]/history.md—— 事件日志~/.claude/plugins/config/claude-for-legal/litigation-legal/CLAUDE.md—— 风险校准(使"风险:高"有具体含义,而非泛泛)
冲突门禁——不可绕过。 在生成简报前,检查 _log.yaml 中是否存在该案件代号。如果案件不在 _log.yaml 中,拒绝并路由:
"我在案件日志中没有找到 [案件代号]。请先运行
/litigation-legal:matter-intake,以便冲突检索可以运行且案件工作空间建立。我不会为未登记的案件生成简报——冲突检索是门禁。"
输入
代号(必填)。如模糊或缺失,请用户从活跃案件列表中选取。
简报内容
[工作成果标头——根据插件配置 ## 输出——因角色不同;见 `## 使用者`]
# [案件名称] —— 简报(截至[今天])
**状态:** [状态 / 阶段]
**风险:** [评级]([严重性] × [可能性])
**重要性:** [类别]
**外聘律师:** [律所 —— 主办律师]
**最后更新:** [日期] [⚠️ 陈旧 >30天]
**利益冲突:** [状态 —— ⚠️ 如 `待定` 或 `未运行`]
---
## 一段话概要
[当前姿态。我们在做什么、为什么。如登记时记录了关键事实,请指名。]
## 近期变化
[history.md 中最近3-5条记录,最新在前。如历史记录较薄,说明。]
## 下一步
- **临近节点:** [next_deadline + 是什么节点]
- **即将到来的里程碑:** [matter.md 或近期历史记录中的任何日期事项]
- **待决定事项:** [matter.md 中标注的待解决问题]
## 敞口
[范围 + 自登记以来的任何变化。如已计提,当前计提金额 + 是否需要重新校准。]
## 内部负责人
[已纳入的人员;是否有人应该纳入但未被纳入]
## 风险重评估检查
*提示,非答案。*
- `risk: [评级]` 是否仍感觉正确,还是案件发生了变化?
- `materiality: [类别]` 是否仍然匹配?(新事实可能推动向计提或披露变化。)
- 案件是否需要补充新的相关方(如证据开示后信息安全负责人变得相关)?
## 待解决问题
[来自 matter.md 及历史记录中尚未解决的事项]
## 通话前备忘
[如用户指定了目的——"在外部律师通话前给我简报"——定制本节:应问的问题、应获取的决定、应提取的进展。如未指定目的,省略本节。]
陈旧度
如 last_updated > 30天前:在顶部标注并建议会议后运行 /litigation-legal:matter-update [slug] 以记录讨论内容。
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 113 lines · 78 tokens per session scan A a6301c33047e
matter-briefing is a skill published in the GitHub repository zhou210712/claude-for-legal-ZH (212 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 78 tokens to every session and 1,338 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 84% identical to chronology, differing in 167 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
specification-writing
A workflow for writing complete patent specifications from patent claims and an invention disclosure. It adapts the document to a chosen jurisdiction, such as the US, Europe, or China.
regulatory-research-fallback
Fallback workflow for regulatory research when web extraction tools fail on government PDFs.
x-scorecard
OpenSSF Scorecard for assessing open source project security. Check security best practices and compliance. Dependency: This is an x-cmd module. Install x-cmd first (see x-cmd skill for installation options). see x-cmd skill for installation.
gesellschaftsrechtliche-satzungen-agb
Für Gesellschaftsrechtliche Satzungen AGB Abgrenzung: ordnet Norm, Beweislast und Gegenargument; Ergebnis: Prüfprodukt mit Risiko und nächstem Schritt. Fachgebiet: AGB-Recht-Prüfer. Route: gesellschaftsrechtliche-satzungen-agb.
memstack-business-gdpr
Use this skill when the user says 'GDPR', 'data protection', 'privacy compliance', 'DPA', 'DSAR', 'data subject request', 'cookie consent', 'privacy audit', 'CCPA', or asks 'do I need GDPR for this repo'. Scans the repository to detect what personal data is collected, classifies sensitivity, determines whether GDPR…
nda-review
Use when the user uploads or pastes a non-disclosure agreement and asks for review, redline, risk assessment, or a recommendation on whether to sign. Identifies missing standard protections, one-sided or unusual provisions, and operational issues; produces a structured report with severity ratings and citations to…