Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add zhou210712/claude-for-legal-ZH --skill matter-intakegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/zhou210712/claude-for-legal-ZHWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/zhou210712/claude-for-legal-zh/matter-intake)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/zhou210712/claude-for-legal-zh/matter-intake"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/zhou210712/claude-for-legal-zh/matter-intake/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/zhou210712/claude-for-legal-zh/matter-intake"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/zhou210712/claude-for-legal-zh/matter-intake.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00091 | $0.03304 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00046 | $0.01652 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00018 | $0.00661 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00330 |
Grade A, and why
matter-intake scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
81% identical to chronology — 319 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 291 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
/matter-intake
- 加载
~/.claude/plugins/config/claude-for-legal/litigation-legal/CLAUDE.md→ 风险校准（用于分流）、执业背景（用于上下文、冲突检索方法）、相关方（用于抄送人员）。 - 按以下工作流操作。
- 运行统一登记：标识信息、利益冲突检索、来源、风险分流、重要性、外聘律师、内部负责人、证据保全、关键日期、初始姿态。
- 从案件名称生成代号（小写、连字符、年份）。
- 创建
~/.claude/plugins/config/claude-for-legal/litigation-legal/matters/[slug]/matter.md—— 完整记述式登记。 - 创建
~/.claude/plugins/config/claude-for-legal/litigation-legal/matters/[slug]/history.md—— 以本次登记作为首条记录。 - 追加结构化行至
~/.claude/plugins/config/claude-for-legal/litigation-legal/matters/_log.yaml。 - 与用户确认："这是我将写入的行——需要修改吗？"
案件登记
目的
每个新案件统一登记，确保案件组合具有可比性。_log.yaml 中统一的行让组合状态技能可以汇总。matter.md 中的记述捕获行格式无法表达的内容。在此播种的历史文件成为事件记录。
加载上下文
~/.claude/plugins/config/claude-for-legal/litigation-legal/CLAUDE.md—— 风险校准（分流门槛、重要性、和解阶梯）、执业背景（相关方、外聘律师库）。~/.claude/plugins/config/claude-for-legal/litigation-legal/matters/_log.yaml—— 确认代号唯一性。
登记内容
1. 标识信息
- 案件名称（常用指代，如"某某公司诉我方 2026 合同纠纷案"）
- 对方当事人
- 案件类别：
合同纠纷 | 劳动争议 | 知识产权 | 行政监管 | 内部调查 | 产品责任 | 其他 - 案由（依据最高人民法院《民事案件案由规定》）
[法条原文] - 我方地位：
原告 | 被告 | 申请人 | 被申请人 | 被调查人- 如实践画像的默认角色已设定，据此预填充并确认。如默认角色为"因案而异"，直接询问。
- 管辖（受理法院、仲裁机构或行政机关）
2. 利益冲突检索
在进一步操作前，按 ~/.claude/plugins/config/claude-for-legal/litigation-legal/CLAUDE.md → 利益冲突审查运行冲突检索步骤。
- 状态：
已通过 | 待定 | 未运行 | 已豁免 - 方式： 匹配
~/.claude/plugins/config/claude-for-legal/litigation-legal/CLAUDE.md声明的方式。 - 审查人： 姓名/团队/律所
- 审查日期： YYYY-MM-DD
- 审查对象： 简要列出实际运行的特定名称/主体（对方、已知关联方、对方律师（如已知）、关键证人）。数量少没关系；"无"不行。
- 备注： 任何标注但已通过的事项。
各状态的行为：
-
已通过→ 继续。 -
待定→ 继续登记；在matter.md和日志行中显著标注冲突尚未解决；每次/matter-update和/portfolio-status中再次提示，直至解决。 -
已豁免→ 罕见；需有冲突豁免理由（起草豁免书超出本技能——记录其存在、签署人和存放位置）。 -
未运行→ 停止。此处为门禁。 冲突姿态解决前不创建matter.md、history.md或_log.yaml条目。三条可接受路径：路径1 —— 现在运行冲突检索。 暂停本登记。按
~/.claude/plugins/config/claude-for-legal/litigation-legal/CLAUDE.md的冲突审查完成。返回时带status: cleared或status: waived附理由。路径2 —— 标注待定，附负责人+截止日期。 仅在
~/.claude/plugins/config/claude-for-legal/litigation-legal/CLAUDE.md的冲突审查声明允许平行登记时可用。记录：谁在运行冲突检索、预计何时返回、检查哪些主体。登记继续；案件行携带conflicts.status: pending；/portfolio-status每次运行均标注；/matter-update重复提示直至解决。
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 291 lines · 91 tokens per session scan A 456b5f367f2c
matter-intake is a skill published in the GitHub repository zhou210712/claude-for-legal-ZH (212 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 91 tokens to every session and 3,304 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 81% identical to chronology, differing in 319 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
specification-writing
A workflow for writing complete patent specifications from patent claims and an invention disclosure. It adapts the document to a chosen jurisdiction, such as the US, Europe, or China.
regulatory-research-fallback
Fallback workflow for regulatory research when web extraction tools fail on government PDFs.
x-scorecard
OpenSSF Scorecard for assessing open source project security. Check security best practices and compliance. Dependency: This is an x-cmd module. Install x-cmd first (see x-cmd skill for installation options). see x-cmd skill for installation.
gesellschaftsrechtliche-satzungen-agb
Für Gesellschaftsrechtliche Satzungen AGB Abgrenzung: ordnet Norm, Beweislast und Gegenargument; Ergebnis: Prüfprodukt mit Risiko und nächstem Schritt. Fachgebiet: AGB-Recht-Prüfer. Route: gesellschaftsrechtliche-satzungen-agb.
memstack-business-gdpr
Use this skill when the user says 'GDPR', 'data protection', 'privacy compliance', 'DPA', 'DSAR', 'data subject request', 'cookie consent', 'privacy audit', 'CCPA', or asks 'do I need GDPR for this repo'. Scans the repository to detect what personal data is collected, classifies sensitivity, determines whether GDPR…
nda-review
Use when the user uploads or pastes a non-disclosure agreement and asks for review, redline, risk assessment, or a recommendation on whether to sign. Identifies missing standard protections, one-sided or unusual provisions, and operational issues; produces a structured report with severity ratings and citations to…