Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add zhou210712/claude-for-legal-ZH --skill policy-redraftgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/zhou210712/claude-for-legal-ZHWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/zhou210712/claude-for-legal-zh/policy-redraft)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/zhou210712/claude-for-legal-zh/policy-redraft"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/zhou210712/claude-for-legal-zh/policy-redraft/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/zhou210712/claude-for-legal-zh/policy-redraft"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/zhou210712/claude-for-legal-zh/policy-redraft.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00105 | $0.01921 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00053 | $0.00960 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00021 | $0.00384 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00011 | $0.00192 |
Grade A, and why
policy-redraft scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 148 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
/policy-redraft
- 读取
~/.claude/plugins/config/claude-for-legal/regulatory-legal/CLAUDE.md→ 政策库索引 + 实践配置。 - 使用以下工作流。
- 收集输入：差距（来自
/regulatory-legal:gaps输出或直接描述）、当前已批准的政策文本、法规文本。 - 验证法规是有效的（按照政策差异分析的法规状态检查）。
- 产出受影响政策章节的带标记修订稿——最小化编辑，
[需核实]标签贯穿全文，内联注释解释每次变更的原因。 - 输出一份政策修订备忘录。写入新文件
[政策名称]-proposed-redraft-[YYYY-MM-DD].md——绝不写入源政策文件。 - 不要在跟踪文件中关闭差距。差距在修订稿被应用且被批准时关闭——这是政策负责人的行动。
此技能产出的是建议稿，不是编辑。它写入一个新文件，文件名明显标注为草稿。它绝不覆盖源政策文件，也绝不在跟踪文件中关闭差距——差距在修订稿被应用且被批准时关闭。
硬性护栏——先读这些
- 这是建议稿，不是编辑。 输出写入新文件
[政策名称]-proposed-redraft-[YYYY-MM-DD].md。不是[政策名称].md。 - 绝不在跟踪文件中关闭差距。 差距在修订稿被应用且被批准时关闭——这是政策负责人的行动。
- "帮我应用这个"超出范围。 如果用户要求将修订稿应用到源政策："我不应用政策变更——那是政策负责人在审阅和批准后的行动。我产出建议稿。当它被审阅和批准后，告诉我，我会更新差距跟踪器。"
- 在修订前确认政策版本。
- 最小化编辑。 删一个词优先于删一句话，删一句话优先于删一段。
- 贯穿
[需核实]标签。 任何来自模型知识或未验证来源的生效日期、阈值、引注或要求在修订稿本身中标记，不仅仅在备忘录中。
第1步：收集输入
需要三个输入。如有缺失，询问——不要推断。
1a. 差距
- 一个来自差距跟踪器的
GAP-ID - 用户在消息中描述的差距
- 从
/regulatory-legal:policy-diff粘贴的差异分析摘要
1b. 当前政策文本
- 文件路径——读取后询问是否已批准的最新版本
- 粘贴的文本——信任但标记
- 两者都没有——要求提供。不要从差距跟踪器或网络搜索猜测政策文本
1c. 法规文本
- 差异分析输出（已提取和标记的法规）
- 已获取的法规——注明来源
- 用户粘贴的法规文本——标记
[用户提供]
第2步：验证法规是否有效
使用与 policy-diff 相同的法规状态检查模式。检查延迟、暂停、修订或废止。如果无法验证，发出旗帜。
第3步：产出修订稿
受影响政策章节的带标记版本。
修订粒度——最小化编辑
- 删一个词优先于删一句话
- 删一句话优先于删一段
- 只触及差距涉及的章节
规范
- 删除文本：
~~删除文本~~ - 插入文本：插入文本
- 每次变更附带内联注释解释原因
第4步：输出——政策修订备忘录
[工作成果头 — 按照插件配置 ## 输出]
> **⚠️ 审阅者说明**
> - **来源：** [法律研究连接器：元典MCP ✓已验证 | 未连接——引用来自模型知识，依赖前需核实]
> - **已阅读：** [已审阅的政策章节；未阅读的内容]
> - **标记为需你判断：** [N项内联标记为 `[审阅]` | 无]
> - **时效性：** [法规状态——已核实 | 未核实]
> - **依赖前：** 确认这是政策的当前已批准版本；核实法规状态和生效日期；获得政策负责人的审阅；遵循你的政策变更批准流程；仅在应用并批准后更新差距跟踪器。
## 政策修订稿：[政策名称]
**差距：** [GAP-ID 或简短描述]
**法规：** [名称、引用、生效日期]
**政策：** [名称、最后更新日期]
**状态：** 建议稿 — 尚未审阅或批准
### 要点
[一句话：差距是什么]。[一句话：修订稿做了什么]。[一句话：什么需要审阅]
### 带标记的政策章节
[修订文本，附内联注释。仅受影响的章节。]
### 变更摘要
| # | 条款 | 当前 | 建议 | 原因 | 核实 |
|---|------|------|------|------|------|
| 1 | [章节] | [原文] | [修订后] | [法规依据] | [来源标签] |
### 应用前——检查清单
- [ ] 确认这是正在修订的政策的当前已批准版本
- [ ] 核实法规状态和生效日期
- [ ] 获得政策负责人的审阅
- [ ] 遵循你的政策变更批准流程
- [ ] 仅在应用并批准后更新差距跟踪器——不是之前
---
**下一步做什么？选择一个，我帮你推进：**
1. **应用并获取批准**——你审阅、分发给政策负责人、经过批准流程。批准后告诉我，我会标记差距已关闭。
2. **获取更多关于[X]的信息**——如果特定变更需要更多基础（需要核实的引注、阈值确认、管辖权问题）
3. **升级至[负责人/GC]**——如果修订稿提出的问题超出政策负责人的权限
4. **观望等待**——如果法规状态不确定或政策负责人不可用
5. **其他**——告诉我你想怎么做
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 148 lines · 105 tokens per session scan A 79aa227a57ca
policy-redraft is a skill published in the GitHub repository zhou210712/claude-for-legal-ZH (212 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 105 tokens to every session and 1,921 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
specification-writing
A workflow for writing complete patent specifications from patent claims and an invention disclosure. It adapts the document to a chosen jurisdiction, such as the US, Europe, or China.
regulatory-research-fallback
Fallback workflow for regulatory research when web extraction tools fail on government PDFs.
x-scorecard
OpenSSF Scorecard for assessing open source project security. Check security best practices and compliance. Dependency: This is an x-cmd module. Install x-cmd first (see x-cmd skill for installation options). see x-cmd skill for installation.
gesellschaftsrechtliche-satzungen-agb
Für Gesellschaftsrechtliche Satzungen AGB Abgrenzung: ordnet Norm, Beweislast und Gegenargument; Ergebnis: Prüfprodukt mit Risiko und nächstem Schritt. Fachgebiet: AGB-Recht-Prüfer. Route: gesellschaftsrechtliche-satzungen-agb.
memstack-business-gdpr
Use this skill when the user says 'GDPR', 'data protection', 'privacy compliance', 'DPA', 'DSAR', 'data subject request', 'cookie consent', 'privacy audit', 'CCPA', or asks 'do I need GDPR for this repo'. Scans the repository to detect what personal data is collected, classifies sensitivity, determines whether GDPR…
nda-review
Use when the user uploads or pastes a non-disclosure agreement and asks for review, redline, risk assessment, or a recommendation on whether to sign. Identifies missing standard protections, one-sided or unusual provisions, and operational issues; produces a structured report with severity ratings and citations to…