Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add zhou210712/claude-for-legal-ZH --skill research-startgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/zhou210712/claude-for-legal-ZHWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/zhou210712/claude-for-legal-zh/research-start)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/zhou210712/claude-for-legal-zh/research-start"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/zhou210712/claude-for-legal-zh/research-start/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/zhou210712/claude-for-legal-zh/research-start"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/zhou210712/claude-for-legal-zh/research-start.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00098 | $0.02780 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00049 | $0.01390 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00020 | $0.00556 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00278 |
Grade A, and why
research-start scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
89% identical to client-intake — 264 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 193 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
/research-start
- 加载
~/.claude/plugins/config/claude-for-legal/legal-clinic/CLAUDE.md→ 管辖地、实践领域。 - 使用以下工作流。
- 具体界定问题。构建路线图：法条起手点（未核实）、案例法领域（非具体案例）、二次文献来源、检索关键词。
- 如学生已上传已有检索成果：综合并识别缺口。
- 输出前置显著的"线索非权威"标题。一切都是学生核实的起手点。
/legal-clinic:research-start "[省份]房屋租赁中以丧失居住条件为由的抗辩"
检索起手：路线图，非具体检索结论
目的
法律检索是诊所教育的核心组成部分。但初始阶段——弄清楚要检索什么、找到正确的法条、理解框架——往往是最耗时且教育价值最低的部分。学生花数小时找到起手点，然后才能做实际的检索工作。
本技能产出起手点：需查阅的法条、需调查的案例法领域、北大法宝和法信的检索关键词。这些全部未经核实。全部非权威。全部是学生去深入追查的线索。
这既是教学保障，也是伦理保障。 学生仍然学习检索。他们只是从一个更好的地方开始。
加载上下文
~/.claude/plugins/config/claude-for-legal/legal-clinic/CLAUDE.md → 管辖地（省份）、实践领域。
工作流
第0步：优先种子文件
在构建路线图之前，阅读诊所自己的种子文件。 指导老师在冷启动时上传（手册、提交指南、本地法院规则、接待表格、示例案件文件、既往备忘录）——它们是预先经过审查的、管辖地特定的，在学生检索的前20分钟比任何数据库查询都更有价值。
- 读取
~/.claude/plugins/config/claude-for-legal/legal-clinic/CLAUDE.md→## 种子文件。识别任何目的或文件名与检索领域匹配的项目。 - 对每个匹配项，将其呈现为路线图输出顶部的优先阅读的种子文件块。命名文件，说明它为什么与这个具体问题相关，并说明它可能涵盖什么 vs. 仍需外部检索的地方。
- 如果没有种子文件匹配该问题，直说（"无诊所种子文件匹配本问题——直接进入一手来源"）。不要编造匹配。
- 如果诊所有
LIMITED DATA标记，添加一行说明。
路线图仍涵盖法条、案例法领域、二次文献来源和检索关键词——种子文件是第一线索，而非替换其余部分。但先呈现它们，让学生从指导老师的先例起点出发。
第1步：界定问题
检索问题是什么？要具体。不是"房屋租赁抗辩"——而是"[省份]以丧失居住条件为由对欠租驱逐的抗辩，具体而言，暖气坏了是否构成，以及承租人是否需要提前书面通知出租人。"
如果问题太宽泛，与学生一起缩小："那是三个检索问题。我们一个一个来。先处理哪个？"
第2步：构建路线图
法条起手点： 列出可能相关的法条。明确说明这些是可能的，非已确认。
可能相关的法条（未核实——确认现行效力和适用性）：
- 《民法典》合同编/物权编相关条款——查找"租赁合同""维修义务"
- [省份/城市]房屋租赁管理条例——可能界定具体条件（供暖、供水）
[核实每条引注的现行效力和准确性——法条可能已被修订]
案例法领域待调查： 不是具体案例——是领域。学生找到案例。
案例法领域：
- [省份]高级人民法院或中级人民法院关于租赁合同纠纷的判决——查找确立裁判规则的典型案例
- 什么条件构成丧失居住条件的案例——具体而言关于供暖的案例
- 程序性先决条件的案例——承租人是否需要提前通知？是否需要将租金提存？
- 救济措施的案例——抵扣欠租，还是另行主张损害赔偿？
行政监管来源： 如适用（行政纠纷尤其）：
行政来源：
- [行政机关]规章
- 行政指导意见或政策手册——通常比法规更及时
用于建立框架的二次文献来源： 在深入一级文献之前获得框架的地方。
二次文献来源（用于建立框架，非引用）：
- [省份]房地产法律实务手册（查阅诊所图书室）
- 相关继续教育培训材料（CLE）
- 如该具体问题存在争议，查阅法学核心期刊文章
检索关键词： 用于北大法宝、法信或诊所使用的其他检索系统。
建议尝试的检索词：
- 北大法宝：
"居住条件" /s "供暖" & [省份]- 中国裁判文书网：
居住条件 AND 供暖 AND [省份]- 法信：
租赁合同 解除 居住条件- 根据返回结果细化——这些是起手查询
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 193 lines · 98 tokens per session scan A 32fb9dccc923
research-start is a skill published in the GitHub repository zhou210712/claude-for-legal-ZH (212 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 98 tokens to every session and 2,780 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 89% identical to client-intake, differing in 264 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
specification-writing
A workflow for writing complete patent specifications from patent claims and an invention disclosure. It adapts the document to a chosen jurisdiction, such as the US, Europe, or China.
regulatory-research-fallback
Fallback workflow for regulatory research when web extraction tools fail on government PDFs.
x-scorecard
OpenSSF Scorecard for assessing open source project security. Check security best practices and compliance. Dependency: This is an x-cmd module. Install x-cmd first (see x-cmd skill for installation options). see x-cmd skill for installation.
gesellschaftsrechtliche-satzungen-agb
Für Gesellschaftsrechtliche Satzungen AGB Abgrenzung: ordnet Norm, Beweislast und Gegenargument; Ergebnis: Prüfprodukt mit Risiko und nächstem Schritt. Fachgebiet: AGB-Recht-Prüfer. Route: gesellschaftsrechtliche-satzungen-agb.
memstack-business-gdpr
Use this skill when the user says 'GDPR', 'data protection', 'privacy compliance', 'DPA', 'DSAR', 'data subject request', 'cookie consent', 'privacy audit', 'CCPA', or asks 'do I need GDPR for this repo'. Scans the repository to detect what personal data is collected, classifies sensitivity, determines whether GDPR…
nda-review
Use when the user uploads or pastes a non-disclosure agreement and asks for review, redline, risk assessment, or a recommendation on whether to sign. Identifies missing standard protections, one-sided or unusual provisions, and operational issues; produces a structured report with severity ratings and citations to…