Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add zhou210712/claude-for-legal-ZH --skill reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/zhou210712/claude-for-legal-ZHWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/zhou210712/claude-for-legal-zh/review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/zhou210712/claude-for-legal-zh/review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/zhou210712/claude-for-legal-zh/review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/zhou210712/claude-for-legal-zh/review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/zhou210712/claude-for-legal-zh/review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00091 | $0.00779 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00036 | $0.00312 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00018 | $0.00156 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00078 |
Grade A, and why
review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
/review
根据审查指引审查接收方协议。从标题识别协议结构，选择合适的技能，如 confirm_routing 启用则在继续前与用户确认。
指令
-
加载审查指引。 如果存在占位符，停止并提示运行
/commercial-legal:cold-start-interview。同时读取## 审查偏好→confirm_routing。 -
获取协议： 从文件路径、云文档链接、合同管理系统ID或粘贴文本获取。
-
读取文件结构——先看标题。 提取主协议标题和全部展示件/附件标题。这是路由信号。
-
根据文件结构选择技能。
文件/条款标题包含 技能 保密协议、NDA、保密协议书（作为主协议） 保密协议审查 主服务协议、专业服务、工作说明书、咨询服务协议 供应商协议审查 订阅、SaaS、云服务、带自动续约的订单、带周期性费用的软件许可 SaaS审查（叠加于供应商协议审查之上） 数据处理协议、DPA（作为展示件或独立文件） 注记供供应商协议审查→数据保护部分 多个技能可适用。常见组合：MSA + DPA展示件 → 供应商协议审查，附DPA注记。
-
如果启用，确认路由。 如果
confirm_routing为true：我将按以下方式审查：[协议类型]。 已识别文件： - [主协议标题] → [技能] - [展示件A标题] → [如何处理] 是否正确？（是/否——或告诉我哪里不对）等待确认。如果
confirm_routing为false：无声继续。 -
运行技能。 完全执行每个技能的工作流。如多个技能适用，依次运行并将输出整合为单一备忘录。
-
检查上报： 如果任何问题超出审查者权限，调用上报标注器路由并起草上报说明。
-
提供后续操作： 给业务负责人的利益方摘要、带修订痕迹的.docx、合同管理系统记录创建、加入续约登记册。
示例
/commercial-legal:review vendor-msa.pdf
/commercial-legal:review https://drive.google.com/file/d/ABC123
/commercial-legal:review
[粘贴协议文本]
输出
按技能格式的完整审查备忘录。路由决定记录在顶部。逐条偏离、具体修订语言、具名审批人。
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 65 lines · 91 tokens per session scan A 0ac5a32c2945
review is a skill published in the GitHub repository zhou210712/claude-for-legal-ZH (238 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 91 tokens to every session and 779 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
fto-triage
Freedom-to-operate triage — a structured first look at potentially blocking patents, not an FTO opinion. Use when a product, process, or feature is being evaluated for blocking patents, when asked whether anything stops a launch, or to build a claim-chart first pass against the most plausible patents before patent…
legal-hold
Issue, refresh, release, or report on legal holds — drafts the hold notice as .docx, updates legalhold fields in log.yaml, and calendars the next refresh. Use when the user says "issue a hold", "refresh hold", "release hold", or asks for a portfolio-wide hold status report.
specification-writing
A workflow for writing complete patent specifications from patent claims and an invention disclosure. It adapts the document to a chosen jurisdiction, such as the US, Europe, or China.
terms-of-service
Draft terms of service and a companion privacy notice matched to the product's form and feature modules, not legal advice, delivered as a Word document.
x-scorecard
OpenSSF Scorecard for assessing open source project security. Check security best practices and compliance. Dependency: This is an x-cmd module. Install x-cmd first (see x-cmd skill for installation options). see x-cmd skill for installation.
ai-risk-management
Apply the NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) and adjacent guidance to AI / ML systems — model lifecycle governance, fairness and bias evaluation, robustness, transparency, accountability, third-party model risk, monitoring for drift, and AI incident response. Broader than prompt-injection (which is the…