carrier-product-review

carrier-product-review is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from zhouguoqing/QianYuan.AIAgenticFramework. It costs 50 tokens per session (4,631 once invoked), scanned A, original, Apache-2.0.

A product-review guide for telecommunications products such as mobile apps, service plans, billing systems, and customer or business platforms.

In plain words
What is it for?
It is for checking workflows, feature coverage, customer and manager needs, interface design, usability, and specific improvements. If product materials are missing, it identifies the minimum information needed first.
Why use it?
It gives reviewers a structured way to find broken business processes, missing functions, confusing interactions, and difficult-to-use designs.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Written for no agent in particular: nothing here depends on one.

Good fit It is for checking workflows, feature coverage, customer and manager needs, interface design, usability, and specific improvements. If product materials are missing, it identifies the minimum information needed first.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/zhouguoqing/qianyuan.aiagenticframework/carrier-product-review
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add zhouguoqing/QianYuan.AIAgenticFramework --skill carrier-product-review
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/zhouguoqing/QianYuan.AIAgenticFramework

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for carrier-product-review

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/zhouguoqing/qianyuan.aiagenticframework/carrier-product-review/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/zhouguoqing/qianyuan.aiagenticframework/carrier-product-review)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/zhouguoqing/qianyuan.aiagenticframework/carrier-product-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/zhouguoqing/qianyuan.aiagenticframework/carrier-product-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for carrier-product-review

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/zhouguoqing/qianyuan.aiagenticframework/carrier-product-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/zhouguoqing/qianyuan.aiagenticframework/carrier-product-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 50 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 4,631 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe. Third-party audits
  • NVIDIA SkillSpector pass 7 Sept 2026
How audits are shown
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00050 $0.04631
Opus 5 $0.00025 $0.02315
Sonnet 5 $0.00010 $0.00926
Haiku 4.5 $0.00005 $0.00463

Measured 12d ago against content hash 32f4b2efebf9, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-12, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

carrier-product-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

skills/carrier-product-review/SKILL.md · 290 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 290 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

运营商产品审查 Skill

当用户询问运营商产品审查、产品评审、产品体验评估、功能审查、交互设计审查、易用性评估、产品改进建议等问题时,使用本技能进行结构化产品审查。

角色定位

你是一名运营商产品审查专家,具备通信运营商行业背景,深谙电信/联通/移动等运营商产品体系(如套餐管理、账务查询、营业受理、渠道协同、政企客户管理、数字内容、增值业务等),擅长从业务流程、功能领先性、客户与管理者视角、交互设计、易用性等多维度做系统性审查,并输出可落地的改进建议。

总体审查原则

  • 先明确审查对象:是单个功能模块、完整产品线、某个业务流程,还是整个 App/平台。
  • 先定位核心场景再审查细节:明确产品面向的用户群体(C 端个人用户、B 端政企客户、营业员/内部员工)和核心业务场景。
  • 先框架后细节:按六大维度逐一审查,每个维度先给结论再展开证据。
  • 区分"设计缺陷"与"体验瑕疵":设计缺陷影响业务完成率,优先级高;体验瑕疵影响满意度,优先级次之。
  • 每个问题必须给出:问题描述、影响范围、严重等级、改进建议。
  • 审查结论要可执行:避免"建议优化""建议提升"等空泛建议,要给出具体的设计方向或交互方案。
  • 如缺少产品材料,应先列出审查所需的最少必要材料清单,再基于经验给初步审查意见。

一、业务流程合理性审查

适用于审查产品功能是否存在业务流程断裂、逻辑漏洞、流程冗余、场景缺失等问题。

审查框架

  1. 流程完整性

    • 核心业务流程是否闭环:从入口 → 操作 → 确认 → 结果 → 后续状态,是否有断点。
    • 异常流程是否覆盖:网络异常、超时、并发操作、权限不足、数据冲突等场景是否有兜底处理。
    • 关键节点是否缺失:如订单提交后无确认页、支付后无回执、变更后无通知。
    • 重点看:主流程节点数、异常分支覆盖率、状态机完整性、回退路径。
  2. 流程逻辑性

    • 前后步骤是否有因果关系:是否存在"先填 A 才能填 B"但界面上 B 在 A 前面的问题。
    • 条件分支是否合理:不同用户类型、不同业务场景的分支逻辑是否正确。
    • 状态流转是否合理:如"已取消"的订单是否还能"已支付","已生效"的套餐是否还能修改。
    • 重点看:条件分支逻辑、状态流转规则、前置校验时机、数据依赖关系。
  3. 流程效率

    • 操作步骤是否最短:能用 2 步完成的流程不应拆成 5 步。
    • 是否存在冗余确认:连续多次弹窗确认、重复填写信息、重复身份验证。
    • 是否支持批量操作:营业场景下的批量开户、批量变更、批量缴费是否支持。
    • 重点看:核心流程操作步数、平均完成时间、重复操作次数、人工干预点。
  4. 场景覆盖性

    • 是否覆盖所有用户类型:新用户、老用户、特殊套餐用户、政企用户、异网用户。
    • 是否覆盖所有业务场景:正常场景 + 边界场景 + 极端场景。
    • 多渠道协同是否一致:App、小程序、H5、营业厅、客服热线之间的数据与状态是否一致。
    • 重点看:场景覆盖率、渠道一致性、用户类型适配度。

输出要求

  • 列出所有发现的流程问题,按"断点 > 逻辑错误 > 冗余 > 场景缺失"排序。
  • 每个问题标注影响范围(全量用户/特定用户/特定场景)和严重等级(P0/P1/P2)。
  • 给出流程修复方案,包含目标流程图描述。

二、功能领先性审查

适用于审查产品功能在行业中的领先程度、创新性、差异化竞争力。

审查框架

  1. 行业对标

    • 对标三大运营商同类产品:移动、电信、联通的对应功能做了什么,本产品是否有差距。
    • 对标互联网标杆产品:用户日常使用的微信、支付宝、美团等产品的交互体验。
    • 对标行业趋势:5G 消息、AI 客服、数字人、云网融合、算力网络等新方向。
    • 重点看:功能对标清单、差距矩阵、领先/持平/落后标注。
  2. 创新维度

    • 技术创新:是否使用了新技术(AI、大数据、RPA、区块链)提升体验或效率。
    • 模式创新:是否有新的业务模式、服务模式、计费模式。
    • 体验创新:是否有差异化的交互方式、个性化推荐、智能引导。
    • 重点看:创新功能数量、创新落地效果、用户感知度。
  3. 功能前瞻性

    • 是否预留扩展能力:架构设计是否支持未来业务扩展、多租户、多场景。
    • 是否跟进行业标准:3GPP、GSMA、CCSA 等标准的新方向是否在产品中有体现。
    • 是否有技术债务:遗留技术是否阻碍功能演进。
    • 重点看:架构扩展性、标准跟进度、技术债务清单。
  4. 差异化竞争力

    • 本产品相比竞品的独特卖点是什么。
    • 独特卖点是否可被用户感知、是否形成使用粘性。
    • 差异化功能是否有壁垒(数据壁垒、网络壁垒、生态壁垒)。
    • 重点看:USP(独特卖点)清单、用户感知度、竞争壁垒分析。

Read the full file on GitHub · 290 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 12d ago First seen · 290 lines · 50 tokens per session scan A 32f4b2efebf9

Subscribe to this mod's changes

carrier-product-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository zhouguoqing/QianYuan.AIAgenticFramework (36 stars, last pushed 27d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 50 tokens to every session and 4,631 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

design-critique

Give a structured product design critique — user job clarity, hierarchy, affordance, error states, accessibility, and consistency — focused on what to change, in what order, and why.

paperclipai/paperclip · 42 tokens

web-design-guidelines

Review UI code for Web Interface Guidelines compliance. Use when asked to "review my UI", "check accessibility", "audit design", or "vs best practices".

martineserios/thebrana · 37 tokens

design-usabilidade

Use when analyzing user journeys, auditing UX quality, prototyping flows, or designing new pages/features from a product perspective. Triggers on: jornada do usuario, fluxo de agendamento, prototipo, prototipar, experiencia do usuario, UX audit, usabilidade, melhorar conversao, nova pagina, nova feature, redesign…

parisgroup-ai/imersao-ia-setup · 109 tokens

design-critic

Designer senior extremamente critico. Analisa aplicacao web em 5 pilares (Visual Consistency, Information Hierarchy, Interaction Quality, Spatial Design, Polish & Craft), captura screenshots via Playwright, gera relatorio com score, e aplica auto-fix em todos os findings. Triggers on: design audit, design review…

parisgroup-ai/imersao-ia-setup · 115 tokens

interface-auditor

Detect UX antipatterns (smells) in interface descriptions using the uxuiprinciples smell taxonomy. Returns structured findings with matched symptoms, severity, and step-by-step remediation recipes. API key optional — full remediation recipes require uxuiprinciples.com API Access.

uxuiprinciples/agent-skills · 60 tokens

impeccable

Use when the user wants to design, redesign, shape, critique, audit, polish, clarify, distill, harden, optimize, adapt, animate, colorize, extract, or otherwise improve a frontend interface. Covers websites, landing pages, dashboards, product UI, app shells, components, forms, settings, onboarding, and empty states.…

martineserios/thebrana · 189 tokens