content-creation

Purpose

Create or revise one evidence-grounded Content Package while keeping conversion cover copy, page-one content copy, and visual production separate.

Required preflight

Call content_ops_get_content_context. Require one PAINPOINT_CONFIRMED target, current Project Profile, Pack and active-rule versions, retained Evidence summaries, historical Content, title-count capability, and a resolved operation. Never treat chat memory as project evidence.

Required tool sequence

1. Call content_ops_plan_content_creation in dry-run mode. Default to at least three material angles and 4–8 pages.
2. Let the host author one core problem, one core viewpoint, page copy, publish title/body, optional truthful CTA, classified claims, dimension scores, and reasoned near-semantic assessments. For Xiaohongshu, also create a versioned Cover Copy Package with distinct cover_primary_hook, cover_secondary_line, optional supporting copy, and unchanged page_1_content_copy.
3. Call content_ops_submit_content_draft. This writes only project-local artifacts and binds Plan hash, painpoint version, rule snapshot, and idempotency key.
4. Show the draft summary and obtain explicit write confirmation before content_ops_finalize_content_copy.
5. Finalize validates Schemas, claims, deterministic fingerprint, duplication, title, page structure and quality; it writes one existing-Base Content record, moves the painpoint to PAINPOINT_CONTENT_IN_PROGRESS, read-verifies, checkpoints, and stops at G3 CONTENT_COPY.
6. Show the exact Content/Copy version and copy. Never infer approval. Only the Router may submit a matching content-copy-review through content_ops_submit_approval.
7. Use list/get/verify tools for readback. For changes, call content_ops_plan_content_revision, retain history, resubmit a new copy version, and wait for a new G3.

Authoring and evidence policy

One Content binds one primary painpoint, core problem, and core viewpoint. It must give the Audience emotional, money, time, risk-reduction, decision, or professional-insight value. External facts and project facts need appropriate Evidence Refs. Professional judgments and opinions must be labelled honestly. Never invent data, studies, rankings, customer stories, cases, or results. An unsupported claim blocks G3.