fine-tune-readiness

fine-tune-readiness is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from zorost/AI-Engineering-Lab. It costs 46 tokens per session (1,165 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A readiness check for deciding whether fine-tuning an AI model is justified and whether its training data is suitable. Fine-tuning changes a model's learned behavior; prompting and retrieval provide cheaper alternatives.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it before supervised fine-tuning, LoRA, or preference-optimization runs, or when an existing fine-tuned model performs poorly and the cause is unclear.
Why use it?
It prevents teams from fine-tuning when better prompts, examples, or document retrieval may solve the problem, and catches dataset issues before training.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Written for no agent in particular: nothing here depends on one.

Good fit Use it before supervised fine-tuning, LoRA, or preference-optimization runs, or when an existing fine-tuned model performs poorly and the cause is unclear.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/zorost/ai-engineering-lab/fine-tune-readiness
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add zorost/AI-Engineering-Lab --skill fine-tune-readiness
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/zorost/AI-Engineering-Lab

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for fine-tune-readiness

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/zorost/ai-engineering-lab/fine-tune-readiness/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/zorost/ai-engineering-lab/fine-tune-readiness)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/zorost/ai-engineering-lab/fine-tune-readiness"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/zorost/ai-engineering-lab/fine-tune-readiness/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for fine-tune-readiness

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/zorost/ai-engineering-lab/fine-tune-readiness"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/zorost/ai-engineering-lab/fine-tune-readiness.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 46 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 1,165 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe. Third-party audits
  • NVIDIA SkillSpector pass 7 Sept 2026
How audits are shown
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00046 $0.01165
Opus 5 $0.00023 $0.00583
Sonnet 5 $0.00009 $0.00233
Haiku 4.5 $0.00005 $0.00117

Measured 13d ago against content hash 26bf0256872c, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-12, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

fine-tune-readiness scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 13d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

reference/skills/agent-skills/fine-tune-readiness/SKILL.md · 96 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 96 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Fine-Tune Readiness

1 · Purpose

Fine-tuning is the last resort in a ladder of cheaper levers, this skill makes the team climb the ladder in order, and gates the dataset before a single training run.

2 · When to use

  • Whenever "we should fine-tune" is proposed.
  • Before any SFT/LoRA/DPO run, to gate the dataset.
  • When a fine-tuned model underperforms and nobody knows why (usually: the data).

3 · Inputs

  • The task spec with metric and gate (spec-first-ai-feature).
  • An eval that can score the behavior change (eval-first-development).
  • The failure log from the current prompt/RAG system, clustered (error-analysis-50).

4 · Procedure

  1. Climb the ladder in order, recording the score each rung achieves: (a) better prompting → (b) few-shot examples → (c) RAG with the right documents → (d) fine-tuning. Quote the score at each rung; do not skip rungs.
  2. Name the failure class fine-tuning is meant to fix. Fine-tuning fixes behavioral classes, format, tone, style, domain vocabulary, consistent refusal/compliance patterns. It does not fix missing facts (that is RAG) or weak reasoning (that is a bigger model or decomposition).
  3. If the failure class is knowledge or freshness, STOP: use RAG. If it is format or tone and rungs a-c are exhausted, proceed.
  4. Gate the dataset before training:
    • ≥ 200 examples for SFT format/behavior shifts (1,000+ for real moves); preference pairs for DPO.
    • Every example reviewed or generated against a written standard.
    • No PII unless the compliance sign-off exists in writing.
    • A held-out slice (≥ 10%) that training never sees.
  5. Choose the method: LoRA/QLoRA first (small adapter, reversible, cheap); full fine-tune only when adapters demonstrably cannot move the metric. DPO only after SFT, when you have preference pairs.
  6. Compute the hardware budget (local-model-fit) or the cloud training cost before launching. Write the number down.
  7. Train, then score on the held-out slice and the golden set. Compare against the best prompt/RAG rung, not against the untrained base model alone.
  8. Ship only if the fine-tune beats the best non-trained rung by a margin that justifies the serving and maintenance cost. Record the decision and the numbers.

Read the full file on GitHub · 96 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 13d ago First seen · 96 lines · 46 tokens per session scan A 26bf0256872c

Subscribe to this mod's changes

fine-tune-readiness is a skill published in the GitHub repository zorost/AI-Engineering-Lab (303 stars, last pushed 25d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 46 tokens to every session and 1,165 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

ai-engineering-toolkit

6 production-ready AI engineering workflows: prompt evaluation (8-dimension scoring), context budget planning, RAG pipeline design, agent security audit (65-point checklist), eval harness building, and product sense coaching.

sickn33/agentic-awesome-skills · 47 tokens

llm-ops

LLM Operations -- RAG, embeddings, vector databases, fine-tuning, prompt engineering avancado, custos de LLM, evals de qualidade e arquiteturas de IA para producao.

davila7/claude-code-templates · 44 tokens

ai-engineering-toolkit

AI Engineering Toolkit workflow skill. Use this skill when the user needs 6 production-ready AI engineering workflows: prompt evaluation (8-dimension scoring), context budget planning, RAG pipeline design, agent security audit (65-point checklist), eval harness building, and product sense coaching and the operator…

diegosouzapw/awesome-omni-skills · 81 tokens

ai-engineering-toolkit

6 production-ready AI engineering workflows: prompt evaluation (8-dimension scoring), context budget planning, RAG pipeline design, agent security audit (65-point checklist), eval harness building, and product sense coaching.

henryalouf/ruflow · 47 tokens

ai-engineering-toolkit

6 production-ready AI engineering workflows: prompt evaluation (8-dimension scoring), context budget planning, RAG pipeline design, agent security audit (65-point checklist), eval harness building, and product sense coaching.

sendralt/agentic-awesome-skills · 47 tokens

ai-engineering-toolkit

6 production-ready AI engineering workflows: prompt evaluation (8-dimension scoring), context budget planning, RAG pipeline design, agent security audit (65-point checklist), eval harness building, and product sense coaching.

LiHongwei-cn/lihongwei-cn · 47 tokens