Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add zpower426/datapowers --skill executing-plansgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/zpower426/datapowersWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/zpower426/datapowers/executing-plans)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/zpower426/datapowers/executing-plans"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/zpower426/datapowers/executing-plans/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/zpower426/datapowers/executing-plans"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/zpower426/datapowers/executing-plans.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00043 | $0.02263 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00017 | $0.00905 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00453 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00226 |
Grade A, and why
executing-plans scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 280 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Executing Analysis Plans
Run a written analysis plan, task by task, with discipline. Every task goes through two mandatory review gates before being marked complete. No exceptions.
Why structured execution matters: Plans are approximations. Execution is where statistical errors, silent data leaks, and code quality debt are introduced. The two-stage review gate exists to catch these problems while they are still cheap to fix — before downstream tasks depend on corrupted outputs.
Iron Law
NO TASK MAY BE MARKED COMPLETE WITHOUT PASSING STATISTICAL REVIEW FIRST.
When to Use
Use this skill when:
- A plan exists at
docs/datapowers/plans/ - Tasks are sequential or tightly coupled (for independent tasks, prefer
subagent-driven-analysis) - You are personally executing each task (not dispatching subagents)
Task State Machine
Every task in the plan moves through these states only:
PENDING → IN_PROGRESS → STAT_REVIEW → CODE_REVIEW → DONE
↓ ↓
STAT_BLOCKED CODE_BLOCKED
↓ ↓
(fix and re-run) (fix and re-review)
Rules:
- Only one task may be
IN_PROGRESSat a time - A task in
STAT_BLOCKEDmust be fixed before the next task begins CODE_REVIEWonly begins afterSTAT_REVIEWpassesDONEis final — re-opening requires documenting why in the manifest
Step-by-Step Procedure
Step 1 — Load the Plan
from pathlib import Path
import json
# Identify the plan file
plan_path = "docs/datapowers/plans/YYYY-MM-DD-<topic>-plan.md"
manifest_path = "artifacts/analysis_manifest.json"
# Read current manifest state
manifest = json.loads(Path(manifest_path).read_text())
print(f"Project: {manifest['project']}")
print(f"Last updated: {manifest['last_updated']}")
# List completed stages to avoid re-running
completed = [k for k, v in manifest.items() if isinstance(v, dict) and v.get("completed")]
print(f"Already completed: {completed}")
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 280 lines · 43 tokens per session scan A 5a954a2f1985
executing-plans is a skill published in the GitHub repository zpower426/datapowers (1 stars, last pushed 7mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 43 tokens to every session and 2,263 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
executing-plans compared with skills from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| executing-planszpower426/datapowers | Skill | 1 | 7mo ago | MIT | A | 43 | Claude Code |
| local-llmTserenTserenov/FMT-exocortex-template | Skill | 63 | today | MIT | A | 78 | Claude Code |
| llm-app-patternsdavila7/claude-code-templates | Skill | 33k | today | MIT | A | 54 | Claude Code, Codex |
| multimodal-blip-2davila7/claude-code-templates | Skill | 33k | today | MIT | A | 52 | Claude Code, Codex |
| post-training-grpo-rl-trainingdavila7/claude-code-templates | Skill | 33k | today | MIT | A | 28 | Claude Code, Codex |
| prompt-engineering-instructordavila7/claude-code-templates | Skill | 33k | today | MIT | A | 44 | Claude Code, Codex |
| emerging-techniques-knowledge-distillationdavila7/claude-code-templates | Skill | 33k | today | MIT | A | 70 | Claude Code, Codex |