Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/zpower426/datapowers/model-evaluationnpx skills add zpower426/datapowers --skill model-evaluationgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/zpower426/datapowersWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/zpower426/datapowers/model-evaluation)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/zpower426/datapowers/model-evaluation"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/zpower426/datapowers/model-evaluation.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00027 | $0.02134 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00014 | $0.01067 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00005 | $0.00427 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00213 |
Grade A, and why
model-evaluation scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 254 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Model Evaluation
Rigorous, statistically grounded evaluation of trained models. The test set is sacred — touched exactly once.
Iron Law: NO CONCLUSIONS WITHOUT SIGNIFICANCE TESTING. TEST SET IS EVALUATED EXACTLY ONCE.
Checklist
- Final model refit — retrain chosen model on full training set
- One-time test set evaluation — never to be repeated
- Full metric suite — primary, secondary, and diagnostic metrics
- Confidence intervals — bootstrap CIs for all reported metrics
- Calibration check — are predicted probabilities trustworthy?
- Error analysis — where does the model fail?
- Feature importance — SHAP values for top features
- Comparison to baseline — is improvement statistically significant?
- Save evaluation artifacts — report, plots, model file
- Flag production readiness — explicit go/no-go with criteria
Step 1: Final Model Refit
import random
import numpy as np
random.seed(42)
np.random.seed(42)
# Retrain on FULL training set (not a validation split)
final_model = LGBMClassifier(**best_params, random_state=42)
final_model.fit(X_train, y_train)
print("✅ Final model trained on full training set")
print(f"Training set size: {len(X_train)} samples")
Step 2: One-Time Test Set Evaluation
# THIS CODE BLOCK RUNS EXACTLY ONCE
y_pred = final_model.predict(X_test)
y_prob = final_model.predict_proba(X_test)[:, 1] # for binary classification
from sklearn.metrics import (
classification_report, confusion_matrix,
f1_score, roc_auc_score, average_precision_score
)
print("=" * 50)
print("FINAL TEST SET EVALUATION (one-time)")
print("=" * 50)
print(classification_report(y_test, y_pred))
print(f"ROC-AUC: {roc_auc_score(y_test, y_prob):.4f}")
print(f"PR-AUC: {average_precision_score(y_test, y_prob):.4f}")
print(f"F1-macro: {f1_score(y_test, y_pred, average='macro'):.4f}")
print("\nConfusion Matrix:")
print(confusion_matrix(y_test, y_pred))
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago First seen · 254 lines · 27 tokens per session scan A ae877e1bbb36
model-evaluation is a skill published in the GitHub repository zpower426/datapowers (1 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 27 tokens to every session and 2,134 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
local-llm
Локальный LLM-стек на Mac (Apple Silicon, MLX) под приватность и запасной режим. NL-вход к установке/запуску/переключению моделей + слой суждения для мониторинга новых моделей. Тонкая обёртка над скриптами РП404, не замена.
llm-app-patterns
Production-ready patterns for building LLM applications. Covers RAG pipelines, agent architectures, prompt IDEs, and LLMOps monitoring. Use when designing AI applications, implementing RAG, building agents, or setting up LLM observability.
blip-2-vision-language
Vision-language pre-training framework bridging frozen image encoders and LLMs. Use when you need image captioning, visual question answering, image-text retrieval, or multimodal chat with state-of-the-art zero-shot performance.
knowledge-distillation
Compress large language models using knowledge distillation from teacher to student models. Use when deploying smaller models with retained performance, transferring GPT-4 capabilities to open-source models, or reducing inference costs. Covers temperature scaling, soft targets, reverse KLD, logit distillation, and…
speculative-decoding
Accelerate LLM inference using speculative decoding, Medusa multiple heads, and lookahead decoding techniques. Use when optimizing inference speed (1.5-3.6× speedup), reducing latency for real-time applications, or deploying models with limited compute. Covers draft models, tree-based attention, Jacobi iteration…
pyvene-interventions
Provides guidance for performing causal interventions on PyTorch models using pyvene's declarative intervention framework. Use when conducting causal tracing, activation patching, interchange intervention training, or testing causal hypotheses about model behavior.