Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add zstevovich/claude-apd --skill apd-finishgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/zstevovich/claude-apdWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/zstevovich/claude-apd/apd-finish)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/zstevovich/claude-apd/apd-finish"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/zstevovich/claude-apd/apd-finish/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/zstevovich/claude-apd/apd-finish"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/zstevovich/claude-apd/apd-finish.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00110 | $0.02071 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00055 | $0.01035 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00022 | $0.00414 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00011 | $0.00207 |
Grade A, and why
apd-finish scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 235 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
APD Finish (Codex)
Run through this BEFORE push, PR, or moving to the next task.
When to use / When to skip
Use when:
- A pipeline cycle just produced a successful commit
- All four pipeline phases are complete;
apd:apd_pipeline_state()reportsnext_step: "commit" - The user has not yet made a push/PR/keep/discard decision
Skip when:
- The pipeline failed before commit — go to
apd-debug, not finish - The user has already pushed — there is nothing to decide
- This is a hotfix outside the pipeline — different decision flow, don't apply pipeline summary template
The Iron Law
NO PUSH WITHOUT USER DECISION FIRST
The pipeline produced a commit. The user — not you — decides what happens next. Never auto-push, never assume.
Process
Step 1 — verify
Re-run the project verifier to confirm nothing slipped through:
apd:apd_verify_step() # runs .codex/bin/verify-all.sh
If it fails, stop — loop back into debug. Do NOT present finish options on red tests.
Step 2 — show what the pipeline did
Pull apd:apd_pipeline_state() and summarize for the user:
- Task name (from spec)
- Which steps completed, timing if available
- Spec criteria count
- Adversarial outcome (total / accepted / dismissed) if present
- Reviewed files count
Step 2b — did this run teach the project anything?
If the run ACCEPTED any adversarial finding, ask one question before moving on: does it generalize? A finding is an instance; the class is what is worth keeping. The fix already landed in code — that part is done.
If the same shape can appear in another module, another handler, another task, record it once:
apd pipeline lesson "<the rule, as a class>" "<what it cost>"
apd pipeline show lessons # what the project already knows
Builders are told to read .apd/lessons.md before they start, so a recorded
class becomes education that arrives automatically on every future dispatch.
Write the RULE, not the patch — if it only makes sense for one file it belongs
in a code comment. Do not record one per finding: past ~20 entries the file
gets skimmed rather than read, and then it teaches nothing. Commit it; it is
team knowledge, not session state.
What ships with it
4 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 235 lines · 110 tokens per session scan A 070a4e2b620e
apd-finish is a skill published in the GitHub repository zstevovich/claude-apd (5 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 110 tokens to every session and 2,071 once invoked, about $0.0006 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
create-pr
Creates a GitHub PR with a Linear-ticket-prefixed title and a decision-led, narrative description for Prisma 8. Use when the user wants to create a pull request, open a PR, or submit changes for review.
git-commit
Generate well-formatted git commit messages following conventional commit standards.
repo-sync
Manage repo-sync on macOS for shared documents and team context. Use when asked what repo-sync does, to automatically sync a repo, add a repo to repo-sync, stop syncing or un-sync a repo, check sync health, configure repo-sync, uninstall it, or install and maintain its bundled agent skill. Ordinary one-time Git pulls…
mcore-split-pr
Split a PR into multiple PRs to reduce the number of required CODEOWNERS reviewer groups.
contributing
How to contribute to evlog, covering commit and PR conventions, changesets, the Definition of Done, testing rules, and the authored skills that walk through building a new adapter, enricher, framework integration, or map rule. Load this for any question about contributing, opening a PR, or adding something to the…
strict-tdd
Strict RED->GREEN->REFACTOR test-driven development with enforcement. Never write production code before a failing test. Atomic commits per TDD cycle.