Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add ZTE-AICloud/Co-OmniSpec --skill e2e-specifygit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ZTE-AICloud/Co-OmniSpecWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/zte-aicloud/co-omnispec/e2e-specify)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/zte-aicloud/co-omnispec/e2e-specify"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/zte-aicloud/co-omnispec/e2e-specify/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/zte-aicloud/co-omnispec/e2e-specify"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/zte-aicloud/co-omnispec/e2e-specify.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00121 | $0.01531 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00048 | $0.00612 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00024 | $0.00306 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00012 | $0.00153 |
Grade A, and why
e2e-specify scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 167 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
用户输入
$ARGUMENTS
在继续之前, 你必须考虑用户输入(如果不为空).
概述
执行测试分析与设计工作流,使用 MFQ&PPDCS 方法论进行测试分析,然后使用 TCON 方法设计黑盒测试用例。
调用场景:
- 初步设计(在
/specify之后):基于初始规范生成初步测试分析和设计 - 更新设计(在
/clarify之后):基于澄清后的规范更新测试分析和设计
执行流程
1. [ ] 设置环境
- 判断操作系统:Windows 或 Linux
- 运行前置检查脚本:
- Windows:
scripts/powershell/check-prerequisites.ps1 --json - Linux:
scripts/bash/check-prerequisites.sh --json
- Windows:
- 解析输出:
- 提取
FEATURE_DIR(特性目录绝对路径) - 提取
SPEC_FILE(规范文件路径) - 提取
AVAILABLE_DOCS(可用文档列表)
- 提取
重要:所有路径必须是绝对路径。
2. [ ] 确定调用场景
根据调用上下文确定场景类型:
- 初步设计:如果在
/specify之后调用,场景为"初步设计" - 更新设计:如果在
/clarify之后调用,场景为"更新设计"
3. [ ] 启动测试分析设计 Agent
使用 Agent 工具启动 @"test-analysis-design (agent)",传递以下参数:
Agent 参数:
subagent_type: "general-purpose"(使用通用 agent)description: "测试分析与设计 - 生成测试分析和黑盒测试用例"prompt包含以下内容:
# 测试分析与设计任务
## 调用场景
{场景类型}: 初步设计/更新设计
## 输入文件
- spec.md: {SPEC_FILE}
- feature_dir: {FEATURE_DIR}
## 任务要求
1. 读取 spec.md 规范文件
2. 使用 MFQ&PPDCS 方法论进行测试分析
3. 生成测试分析报告(test-analysis.md)
4. 使用 TCON 四步法设计黑盒测试用例
5. 生成黑盒测试用例文档(e2e-test.md)
## 输出位置
- test-analysis.md: {FEATURE_DIR}/test-analysis.md
- e2e-test.md: {FEATURE_DIR}/e2e-test.md
## 重要说明
- 如果是"初步设计"场景:所有 Issues 保持 Open 状态
- 如果是"更新设计"场景:根据澄清结果更新,将相关 Issues 标记为 Resolved
4. [ ] 验证生成文档
等待 agent 完成后,验证生成的文档:
-
检查文档存在性:
- 检查
{FEATURE_DIR}/test-analysis.md是否存在 - 检查
{FEATURE_DIR}/e2e-test.md是否存在
- 检查
-
验证文档内容:
test-analysis.md应包含:- KYM 分析
- TCO 分析
- MFQ 建模结果
- 测试点清单
- Issues 列表(状态应为 Open 或 Resolved)
e2e-test.md应包含:- 用例清单
- 用例详情(Given-When-Then 格式)
- 测试数据设计
- 追溯性矩阵
-
处理验证结果:
- [成功] 验证成功:输出完成报告,继续下一步
- [失败] 验证失败:
- 记录错误信息
- 如果是关键错误(文档未生成、内容为空),报告失败
- 如果是非关键错误(部分内容缺失),记录警告但继续
5. [ ] 报告完成情况
输出完成报告,包括:
-
生成文档:
- test-analysis.md 路径
- e2e-test.md 路径
-
验证结果:
- 文档存在性检查:[成功]/[失败]
- 内容完整性检查:[成功]/[失败]
- 问题列表(如有)
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 167 lines · 121 tokens per session scan A ea01cf6402ab
e2e-specify is a skill published in the GitHub repository ZTE-AICloud/Co-OmniSpec (57 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 121 tokens to every session and 1,531 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
verify-omnigent
Drive Omnigent the way a user does and prove a behavior with recorded evidence, using an isolated server, runner, and mock model plus a feature map of every user entry point. Load before reproducing a user-facing bug, before claiming a fix works, or when reviewing whether a change covered every surface (session vs.…
test-master
Generates test files, creates mocking strategies, analyzes code coverage, designs test architectures, and produces test plans and defect reports across functional, performance, and security testing disciplines. Use when writing unit tests, integration tests, or E2E tests; creating test strategies or automation…
eval-dataset-design
A guide to creating reliable test sets for AI agents. Each evaluation task includes the request, the simulated user's behaviour, a reset starting state, and a success check that can be independently verified.
dogfood
Systematically explore and test a mobile app on iOS/Android with agent-device to find bugs, UX issues, and other problems. Use when asked to dogfood, QA, exploratory test, find issues, bug hunt, or test this app on mobile.
cua-driver
Use Cua Driver for desktop or browser tasks that are awkward or unavailable through Bash/APIs, or when the user explicitly wants GUI interaction: app testing, visual bug reproduction, form filling, calendar entry, screenshots, and demo recording. Also covers Cua setup; not OpenAI Codex Computer Use or web research.
critique
Adversarial design critique of the current work. Render it, look at it, and argue for rejection. Run after the gates are green, never instead of them.