Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add ZTE-AICloud/Co-OmniSpec --skill e2e-varifygit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ZTE-AICloud/Co-OmniSpecWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/zte-aicloud/co-omnispec/e2e-varify)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/zte-aicloud/co-omnispec/e2e-varify"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/zte-aicloud/co-omnispec/e2e-varify/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/zte-aicloud/co-omnispec/e2e-varify"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/zte-aicloud/co-omnispec/e2e-varify.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00101 | $0.03200 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00040 | $0.01280 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00020 | $0.00640 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00320 |
Grade A, and why
e2e-varify scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 337 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
用户输入
$ARGUMENTS
在继续之前, 你必须考虑用户输入(如果不为空).
概述
执行 E2E 测试设计的完整性检查和完善工作流,作为 e2e-design 的下游动作。
调用场景:
- 下游调用(推荐):在
e2e-design生成e2e-impl-design.md后自动执行 - 独立调用:直接执行测试设计完善(需要已有 e2e-impl-design.md)
输入要求:
spec.md:功能规范文档design.md:设计文档e2e-test.md:黑盒测试用例文档e2e-impl-design.md:测试实现分析报告(e2e-design 输出)
输出:
- 更新后的
e2e-impl-design.md:完善的测试实现分析报告
执行流程
1. [ ] 设置环境
- 判断操作系统:Windows 或 Linux
- 运行前置检查脚本:
- Windows:
scripts/powershell/check-prerequisites.ps1 --json --require-e2e-impl-design - Linux:
scripts/bash/check-prerequisites.sh --json --require-e2e-impl-design
- Windows:
- 解析输出:
- 提取
FEATURE_DIR(特性目录绝对路径) - 提取
SPEC_FILE(规范文件路径) - 提取
DESIGN_FILE(设计文件路径) - 提取
E2E_TEST_FILE(黑盒测试用例文件路径) - 提取
E2E_IMPL_DESIGN_FILE(测试实现分析报告路径) - 提取
AVAILABLE_DOCS(可用文档列表)
- 提取
重要:所有路径必须是绝对路径。
2. [ ] 验证前置文件
验证以下必需文件是否存在:
-
检查规范文件:
{FEATURE_DIR}/spec.md是否存在- 如果不存在:错误 "规范文件不存在,请先执行 /specify"
-
检查设计文件:
{FEATURE_DIR}/design.md是否存在- 如果不存在:错误 "设计文件不存在,请先执行 /design"
-
检查测试用例文件:
{FEATURE_DIR}/e2e-test.md是否存在- 如果不存在:错误 "黑盒测试用例文件不存在,请先执行 /e2e-specify"
-
检查测试实现分析报告:
{FEATURE_DIR}/e2e-impl-design.md是否存在- 如果不存在:错误 "测试实现分析报告不存在,请先执行 /e2e-design"
-
报告验证结果:
- 所有文件存在:继续执行步骤3
- 任何文件缺失:终止流程并报错
3. [ ] 加载上下文文档
加载用于测试设计完善的上下文文档:
必需文档:
- spec.md:读取用户故事、功能需求、验收场景
- design.md:读取架构设计、详细设计、接口定义、数据结构
- e2e-test.md:读取所有黑盒测试用例(Given-When-Then 格式)
- e2e-impl-design.md:读取测试实现分析报告
可选文档(按优先级加载):
-
baseline 文档:
baseline/code-structure.md:现有代码结构baseline/existing-apis.md:现有接口定义baseline/call-graph.md:调用链路(用于确定外部依赖)baseline/detailed-design.md:现有架构设计
-
存量测试代码:
- 搜索现有测试目录(如
tests/、test/) - 查找类似功能的测试实现
- 提取测试模式、异常场景处理、测试数据构造方法
- 搜索现有测试目录(如
加载策略:
- 每个文档独立容错,失败不中断流程
- 记录成功加载的文档列表
- 标注缺失的文档
4. [ ] 执行变更点覆盖分析
- 识别需求变更点:
- 阅读 spec.md,提取本次需求变更内容
- 与 design.md 对照,识别受影响的模块和接口
- 与 baseline 对照,识别新增或修改的功能点
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 337 lines · 101 tokens per session scan A 4d06837ba81d
e2e-varify is a skill published in the GitHub repository ZTE-AICloud/Co-OmniSpec (57 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 101 tokens to every session and 3,200 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
verify-omnigent
Drive Omnigent the way a user does and prove a behavior with recorded evidence, using an isolated server, runner, and mock model plus a feature map of every user entry point. Load before reproducing a user-facing bug, before claiming a fix works, or when reviewing whether a change covered every surface (session vs.…
test-master
Generates test files, creates mocking strategies, analyzes code coverage, designs test architectures, and produces test plans and defect reports across functional, performance, and security testing disciplines. Use when writing unit tests, integration tests, or E2E tests; creating test strategies or automation…
eval-dataset-design
A guide to creating reliable test sets for AI agents. Each evaluation task includes the request, the simulated user's behaviour, a reset starting state, and a success check that can be independently verified.
dogfood
Systematically explore and test a mobile app on iOS/Android with agent-device to find bugs, UX issues, and other problems. Use when asked to dogfood, QA, exploratory test, find issues, bug hunt, or test this app on mobile.
cua-driver
Use Cua Driver for desktop or browser tasks that are awkward or unavailable through Bash/APIs, or when the user explicitly wants GUI interaction: app testing, visual bug reproduction, form filling, calendar entry, screenshots, and demo recording. Also covers Cua setup; not OpenAI Codex Computer Use or web research.
critique
Adversarial design critique of the current work. Render it, look at it, and argue for rejection. Run after the gates are green, never instead of them.