Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add ZTE-AICloud/Co-OmniSpec --skill mini-design-reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ZTE-AICloud/Co-OmniSpecWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/zte-aicloud/co-omnispec/mini-design-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/zte-aicloud/co-omnispec/mini-design-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/zte-aicloud/co-omnispec/mini-design-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/zte-aicloud/co-omnispec/mini-design-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/zte-aicloud/co-omnispec/mini-design-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00016 | $0.00628 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00008 | $0.00314 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00003 | $0.00126 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00063 |
Grade A, and why
mini-design-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
1 near-identical copy found in the catalogue:
- mini-implement-review — 88% identical, 43 lines differ
What it actually says
准备阶段
- 判断当前操作系统，windows还是linux系统;
- 清理上次评审文档
- windows: 仓库根目录下执行脚本(不要从技能目录下找):
scripts/powershell/mini-delete-review.ps1 --design。 - linux: 仓库根目录下执行脚本(不要从技能目录下找):
scripts/bash/mini-delete-review.sh --design。
- 获取详设文档
- windows： 仓库根目录下执行脚本(不要从技能目录下找):
scripts/powershell/mini-check.ps1 --json - linux:仓库根目录下执行脚本(不要从技能目录下找):
scripts/bash/mini-check.sh --json- 解析 JSON 获取 DESIGN ，DESIGN 为详设文档。 对于参数中的单引号如 "I'm Groot", 使用转义语法: 例如 'I'''m Groot'(或尽可能使用双引号: "I'm Groot").
- 解析 JSON 获取 FEATURE_DIR ， FEATURE_DIR 需求相关文档产物所在目录。
- 判断详设文档 DESIGN 是否存在，且内容不为空。如果详设文档 DESIGN 不存在或者内容为空，则结束该SKILL。
评审次数上限保护
- 读取文件 FEATURE_DIR/design-review-times.md ，该文件内容为一个数字，表示当前为第几次评审。
- *** 当前评审次数大于等于3 *** 向FEATURE_DIR/review-result.md中写入
评审通过，然后直接退出本次评审，不执行后续步骤。
检查校验
按以下要求检查详设文档 DESIGN，将不满足校验的内容，写到文档 FEATURE_DIR/review-result.md， 写清楚哪个位置违反了什么校验条件。 *** 只评审下述提到的要求评审，不自己增加评审项 ***
宪章检查
- 读取
.omni-infra/memory/constitution.md：了解章程约束，判断 DESIGN 中是否有违反规章约束。 - 如果没有违反该项检查，则 FEATURE_DIR/review-result.md 中写入，
宪章检查：通过
新增函数检查
- 新实现的任何函数，需要确认无相同功能的函数。
- 如果没有违反该项检查，则 FEATURE_DIR/review-result.md 中写入，
新增函数检查：通过
调用现有函数检查
- 调用的已有函数，需要实际读取函数完整代码确认实现逻辑是否符合本次需求要求。
- 如果没有违反该项检查，则 FEATURE_DIR/review-result.md 中写入，
调用现有函数检查：通过
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 39 lines · 16 tokens per session scan A 778cebc3c335
mini-design-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository ZTE-AICloud/Co-OmniSpec (54 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 16 tokens to every session and 628 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
autoreview
Pre-commit/ship code review: Codex default; optional Claude or Pi.
omh-code-review
This is a Hermes-native code-review workflow skill.
revdiff-plan
Review the last Codex assistant message (plan, analysis, or proposal) with inline annotations in a TUI overlay. Extracts the most recent response from Codex rollout files and opens it in revdiff for review and annotation. Activates on "revdiff-plan", "review plan with revdiff", "annotate plan", "review last response"…
code-reviewer
Code review specialist focused on patterns, bugs, security, and performance.
full-repo-review
Comprehensive four-wave review of all repo source files, producing a prioritized issue backlog.
agent-teams-simplify-and-harden
Implementation + audit loop using parallel agent teams with structured simplify, harden, and document passes. Spawns implementation agents to do the work, then audit agents to find complexity, security gaps, and spec deviations, then loops until code compiles cleanly, all tests pass, and auditors find zero issues or…