codexspec:implement-tasks

A workflow that carries out a prepared list of software implementation tasks. It can use TDD, or test-driven development, where tests are written before the code, when the task calls for it.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to implement tasks from a `tasks.md` file or the matching project specification, including code changes and their tests.
Why use it?
It provides a defined path from approved tasks to completed code, while handling documentation and configuration changes directly.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/zts0hg/codexspec/codexspec-implement-tasks
Any agent
npx skills add Zts0hg/codexspec --skill codexspec-implement-tasks
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Zts0hg/codexspec

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Per session 31 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 4,380 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00031 $0.04380
Opus 5 $0.00015 $0.02190
Sonnet 5 $0.00006 $0.00876
Haiku 4.5 $0.00003 $0.00438

Measured 2d ago against content hash d849533524bb, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

codexspec:implement-tasks scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.agents/skills/codexspec-implement-tasks/SKILL.md · 402 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 402 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Task Implementer

Language Preference

Read .codexspec/config.yml. Two independent language controls apply (each falls back to language.output, then English):

  • Interaction language (language.interaction): language for all conversation with the user — questions, explanations, status messages, and codexspec CLI terminal output.
  • Document language (language.document): language for generated artifact files (requirements/spec/plan/tasks).

Converse in the interaction language and author artifacts in the document language. Apply the project's translation standard to both: translate by meaning (not word-for-word), keep English for terms with no good native equivalent, and write as if originally in that language.

Feature Resolution

Resolve the feature in this order:

  1. Use an explicit path from the text after the $codexspec:implement-tasks skill mention when it identifies a tasks.md file or feature directory.
  2. Otherwise match the current branch, which must use the timestamp format, to .codexspec/specs/<branch>/.
  3. If no unique feature can be resolved, ask the user to select one. Never silently select the latest workspace.

Derive all artifact paths from the selected feature directory. All implementation-side output belongs to that workspace.

Input Documents and Authority

Read:

  • requirements.md
  • spec.md
  • design.md
  • plan.md
  • tasks.md
  • .codexspec/memory/constitution.md when present

Authority order:

  1. Confirmed entries in requirements.md
  2. spec.md
  3. Constitution and verified repository facts
  4. design.md
  5. Approved plan.md
  6. tasks.md

A legacy feature may have no design.md; when it is absent, proceed with plan.md as the design-and-plan authority.

When requirements.md is absent, use legacy spec-only mode. Treat spec.md as the temporary highest feature authority and state that fidelity to the original discussion cannot be verified.

Role

You are an autonomous implementation agent. Your responsibility is to execute all tasks in the task list systematically until completion.

Read the full file on GitHub · 402 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 2d ago First seen · 402 lines · 31 tokens per session scan A d849533524bb

Subscribe to this mod's changes

codexspec:implement-tasks is a skill published in the GitHub repository Zts0hg/codexspec (5 stars, last pushed 4d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 31 tokens to every session and 4,380 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

spec-manager

Spec-driven project iteration workflow — L1 PRD → L2 Design → L3 Impl → Agent Task → Deploy, with human review gates at each layer. Pure local markdown storage, no MCP, no network. Use when the user invokes /spec-manager or asks for: new feature/PRD, technical design, implementation spec, agent task, iteration plan…

loki-ai-ch/spec-manager · 92 tokens

spec-manager

Spec-driven project iteration workflow — L1 PRD → L2 Design → L3 Impl → Agent Task → Deploy, with human review gates at each layer. Pure local markdown storage, no MCP, no network. Use when the user invokes /spec-manager or asks for: new feature/PRD, technical design, implementation spec, agent task, iteration plan…

loki-ai-ch/spec-manager · 92 tokens

spec-manager

Spec-driven project iteration workflow: L1 PRD -> L2 Design -> L3 Impl -> Agent Task, with human review gates at each layer.

loki-ai-ch/spec-manager · 33 tokens

comet-native

Comet Native 工作流。当用户明确调用 /comet-native、要求启动或恢复 Native change,或入口路由到 Native 时使用。.

rpamis/comet · 34 tokens

comet-design

Comet Classic 阶段 2 —— 为 change 产出深度技术 Design Doc。.

rpamis/comet · 24 tokens

bug-triage

Read all open bugs in production/qa/bugs/, re-evaluate priority vs. severity, assign to sprints, surface systemic trends, and produce a triage report. Run at sprint start or when the bug count grows enough to need re-prioritization.

Donchitos/Claude-Code-Game-Studios · 59 tokens