Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add zxpmail/ReqForge --skill release-buildergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/zxpmail/ReqForgeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/zxpmail/reqforge/release-builder)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/zxpmail/reqforge/release-builder"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/zxpmail/reqforge/release-builder/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/zxpmail/reqforge/release-builder"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/zxpmail/reqforge/release-builder.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.01873 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00749 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00375 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00187 |
Grade B, and why
release-builder scanned grade B with 1 finding against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Recursive force deletemediumDestructive command
rm -rf with a variable or a broad path is one typo away from removing the wrong tree.
**Build cache pollution**: `rm -rf dist &&` before final build when in doubt. Downgraded: this mod is about security review, or the phrase is quoted, so it is likely naming the pattern rather than instructing it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 169 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
name: release-builder description: Used when the user wants to package, deploy, publish, or go live, or when project development is complete and ready for delivery. Covers Web deployment, Desktop packaging, and CLI publishing, with built-in privacy audit and smoke testing. version: 1.1.0 updated: 2026-05-30 requires: []
[Task] Execute the full build-package-test-publish lifecycle according to project type. Ensure the release artifact: can be installed, can run, has no privacy leaks, has no security vulnerabilities.
[Not For] - Writing code or features -> use /dev-builder instead - Fixing bugs found during testing -> use /bug-fixer instead - Reviewing code quality -> use /code-review instead - Projects with no code yet -> use /dev-builder first
[Dependency Check] Executed on demand after requirements gathering, based on the user's chosen release channel.
Basic checks:
- Project code exists -> if no code, prompt to call /dev-builder first
- git available
- Build tools available
- package.json exists
Channel checks:
- Based on the user's chosen release channel, check the required CLI tools and authentication status for that channel
- User only wants to package (not publish) -> skip deployment tool checks
Installation strategy:
- Missing tools: the Agent autonomously determines the installation method and installs directly
- Operations requiring user login/authentication: prompt the user to complete authentication
- When user-specific assets like signing certificates are missing, explain what is needed and guide the user to prepare
Optional:
- Product-Spec.md -> if available, cross-reference features for smoke testing
- `.forge/security-guidance.md` -> if present, **read before release**
- `.forge/preflight.json` -> if present, **run `pnpm preflight`** before publish; exit code 1 = blocked (see `core/docs/external-publish-preflight.md`)
[First Principles]
Release 前必读 references/first-principles.md
[Output Style]
→ references/output-style.md(发布工程师风格)
[File Structure]
release-builder/ ├── SKILL.md ├── commands/release-builder.md └── references/ ├── first-principles.md ├── output-style.md ├── workflow.md # Step 1–8(必读) ├── release-checklist.md # 版本/构建/隐私/依赖/Git ├── release-strategy.md # Web / Desktop / CLI ├── rollback-strategy.md ├── finishing-branch-checklist.md ├── anti-rationalization.md ├── anti-ai-slop-checklist.md └── yolo-mode.md
[Gotchas]
Privacy leaks in build artifacts: Always grep for /Users/, C:\Users\, API_KEY, sk-ant- before packaging.
Skipping smoke test: Run the binary / hit homepage / verify core flow — compilation ≠ shippable.
Version tag mismatch: package.json, git tag, and artifact name must match.
Build cache pollution: rm -rf dist && before final build when in doubt.
[Anti-Rationalization Checklist]
→ references/anti-rationalization.md
遇 skipping smoke test / skipping privacy audit / skipping rollback plan 时读取。
[Output Artifacts] - Build artifacts — .next/, dist/, release/ and other build output directories - Deployment URL (Web) — production environment access address - npm package publish (CLI) — version on npm registry - Git tag — v[version] tag + GitHub Release (optional)
What ships with it
13 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
- commands/release-builder.md 666 B
- references/anti-ai-slop-checklist.md 3.2 KB
- references/anti-rationalization.md 1.2 KB
- references/finishing-branch-checklist.md 723 B
- references/first-principles.md 1.3 KB
- references/output-style.md 777 B
- references/release-checklist.md 1.6 KB
- references/release-dimension-checklist.md 4.2 KB
- references/release-strategy.md 1.2 KB
- references/rollback-strategy.md 551 B
- references/workflow.md 3.2 KB
- references/yolo-mode.md 679 B
- skill.json 894 B
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 169 lines · 0 tokens per session scan B 69fcc15c8308
release-builder is a skill published in the GitHub repository zxpmail/ReqForge (18 stars, last pushed 10d ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 1,873 tokens. A static security scan graded it B with 1 finding (recursive force delete). No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
gentle-ai-collab-perfect
Trigger: contributing to Gentleman-Programming/gentle-ai as an external collaborator. Strict issue-first workflow, honest PR bodies, contributor-vs-maintainer scope, chained-PR strategy, verification protocol, docstring coverage. Load whenever the active repo is Gentleman-Programming/gentle-ai and any part of the…
chinese-git-workflow
A reference for configuring Git with Chinese code-hosting services such as Gitee, Coding.net, GitLab China, and CNB, including SSH, HTTPS, credentials, CI, and repository mirroring.
chinese-commit-conventions
A Chinese-language guide to Conventional Commits, a format for writing consistent Git commit messages, plus related changelog, commit-checking, and commit-helper configuration.
branch-pr
Create Gentle AI pull requests with issue-first checks. Trigger: creating, opening, or preparing PRs for review.
using-git-worktrees
A guide to using Git worktrees, which let you keep multiple branches in separate folders at the same time.
work-unit-commits
Plan commits as reviewable work units. Trigger: implementation, commit splitting, chained PRs, or keeping tests and docs with code.