19,479 mods in this category, of every kind an
agent can take. Each one carries what it costs per session, what the
scan found, and whether it is the original.
Dev-pipeline skill corpus for Claude Code: solve-issue, review-pr, validate-issue, and more. Ships SKILL.md prose as source of truth plus skill.yaml state machines generated by atomic-gates' offline converter. Pairs with atomic-gates >= 0.3.0 for schema-validated execution and audit trail.
Review a supplied code change or explicit file set using all applicable contextual, repository, language, and quality rules. Use whenever Codex is asked to review, audit, or inspect code in the app, CLI, IDE, automation, or another review adapter. Do not implement fixes unless the user explicitly changes the task.
Command "clean-code" from sadjow/home-manager, covering clean code principles and techniques, fundamental principles, naming conventions, function design and code organization.
Use this agent when the user asks to review STM32 firmware code, check for bugs, validate peripheral configuration, audit interrupt priorities, check DMA setup, or review embedded code quality. This agent also regenerates code with fixes applied. Examples: Context: User wants code reviewed for correctness user…
Vendor-neutral adversarial code review from Claude, Cursor, DeepSeek, Gemini, Kimi, and MiniMax — via API key or each tool's own CLI subscription. The codex-plugin-cc experience for every model.
★not rated 6 5mo agoA
tokens not measured
originalApache-2.0
Meet your new sous chef, Jeff: a model-native quality control plane and cooperative workflow protocol for trusted operators and friendly agents, not a security sandbox.
★not rated 6
changed 2mo agoA
tokens not measured
originalApache-2.0
Run a bounded SPEC → BUILD → REVIEW → REPAIR workflow until verified or blocked. Explicit invocation only: $specloop in Codex or /specloop in Claude Code.
Analyse de profil GitHub orientée objectif : eval README, détection marqueurs IA, signaux recruteur, conseils keywords et SEO. Né du live TPC GitHub Roast.
Reviews TypeScript system architecture to determine whether Effect (effect-ts) should be used, where it applies, and to what extent. Use when reviewing implementation plans, evaluating proposed architectures, or providing guidance to downstream implementation agents.
Your agent writes the code, a different model tries to break it, and only what survives ships. Cross-model, edit-locked review with a machine-readable verdict, gated merges, durable decisions, stuck-loop and timeout guards, and read-only reasoning one-shots. Harness-neutral.
★not rated 6
changed 14d agoA
tokens not measured
originalMIT
Address unresolved PR review comments. Pass the GitHub PR URL as the argument (e.g. /pr-addr-feedback https://github.com/org/repo/pull/123). Uses gh CLI for auth — works with private repos.
Primes an artefact-producing agent to separate what it intended, what it materialised, what it re-checked, and what remains unverified before it reports completion. Load for build-class tasks (code generation, evidence-pack emission, tool-wrapper generation, implementation work whose claims can be re-tested against…
Use when user asks to simplify code, clean up code, refactor for clarity, review code quality, or at end of coding sessions before commits/PRs. Triggers on "simplify", "clean up code", "refactor", "code review", "make it cleaner".
Use when reviewing current branch for bugs before pushing or merging, when wanting a thorough multi-agent review of local changes, or when preparing work for human review.
Use when a bug, regression, robustness fix or wording defect arrives that stays inside an approved commitment — it becomes a ticket file that records the evidence, the expected behaviour's source and the commitment, and serves as the brief a coding agent fixes it from. Also list for the open tickets and T- for a state…
Project skill of the dotclaude plugin-source repo (NOT part of the shipped plugin): audits plugins/devops and plugins/local-llm for token cost vs benefit, integrity and Claude-Code currency, repo and ship hygiene, and produces an interactive concept-page report with one include/discard card per suggestion. Triggers…
Summon OpenAI Codex as an adversarial reviewer of specs/plans and branch diffs, then debate it to convergence. Codex is the hard gate; it never commits.
★not rated 5 4mo agoA
tokens not measured
originalMIT
At most 3 mods per repository are shown here, and a mod shipped inside a plugin is left to that plugin's page — the rest are on their repository pages: