19,479 mods in this category, of every kind an
agent can take. Each one carries what it costs per session, what the
scan found, and whether it is the original.
Give or respond to PR reviews with structural awareness via mache. Review mode: review-prep diagrams + impact analysis, parallel analysis agents, one consolidated GitHub review. Respond mode: address reviewer comments.
Use this agent for Step S.6.4 - Code Review.\n\nPerforms an independent code review of the current phase's changes, checking for bugs, logic errors, security issues, and adherence to project conventions.\n\nExamples:\n\n \nContext: Step S.6.4, no external reviewer configured.\n\nuser: "Review the code changes for this…
Surgical AI for your codebase. Plugs into any project, performs a 12-dimension diagnostic scan (git forensics, architecture, tech debt, security, infrastructure), delivers a Codebase Vitals health score, then assembles and manages an adaptive AI surgical team calibrated to YOUR project. Pendrive architecture — plug…
Fourteen focused engineering skills for planning, implementation, causal debugging, review, verification, complete execution, and recoverable deployment. Optional hook reminders; no forced router. Includes authored HyperFrames video and diagram-first Excalidraw workflows.
★not rated 2
changed 1mo agoA
tokens not measured
originalMIT
Read-only reviewer for JWT login, password hashing, and /auth routes in this tracker. Use when the user asks to review auth.py, registration, login tokens, or getcurrentuser. Use after changes to auth helpers or auth routes. Do not use for session/cost exploration or for implementing features.
You are a senior Code Reviewer with 12+ years of experience in software development and code quality assurance. You specialize in identifying code quality issues, performance optimization opportunities, and ensuring adherence to best practices across multiple programming languages and frameworks.
Adversarially grill CLAUDE'S OWN answer/plan/reasoning before it ships — make the reasoning explicit (explain harder), then spawn a fresh effort-escalating refute jury that KILLS by default and injects FALSE-PREMISE trap questions, looping until no new defects survive. Forces source citations on every claim…
Audits real codebases for data structure, algorithm, database, caching, scalability, reliability, and AI-system design improvements. Use when users ask to reduce time or space complexity, find hot paths, choose DSA patterns, optimize queries, improve architecture, scale a product, review infra, design RAG/agent…
Catches the garbage your AI assistant left behind — security shortcuts, secrets buried in git history, code nobody understands. One 0-100 score, 100% local, no LLM in the loop.
★not rated 2 4mo agoA
tokens not measured
AGPL-3.0
Use when shipping a branch: reviewing, documenting, linting, testing, and pushing work through Agentic Preflight. Also use when a push is blocked by the agentic-preflight pre-push hook or when the user says agentic-preflight:uninstall to remove this tool from the current project.
Codex CLI second-opinion bridge for Claude Code. Wraps both codex exec (prompt-driven) and codex review (diff-driven) under one workflow with shared project-context preamble, filesystem boundary, JSON stream parsing, and a structured findings table. Five modes: review — custom-prompt audit of file/folder plan …
Architecture review skill. Provides a complete 9-dimension review model, 4 analysis techniques, 8 major anti-pattern detection checklists, and structured report templates. Triggers when user says "review architecture", "architecture health check", "analyze module dependencies", "evaluate evolvability".
★not rated 2 4mo agoA62 tokens
originalMIT
At most 3 mods per repository are shown here, and a mod shipped inside a plugin is left to that plugin's page — the rest are on their repository pages: