kalyvask

kalyvask/winning-writing

Plugin Claude Code

Plugin marketplace listing 1 plugin: winning-writing.

kalyvask/winning-writing

Plugin Claude Code

31 writing skills for cold outreach, op-eds, pitches, exec memos, performance reviews, bios, speeches, gratitude notes, press inquiries, and reply-rate tracking. Distilled from Stanford GSB's Winning Writing (Glenn Kramon, GSBGEN 352).

kalyvask/winning-writing

Skill Claude CodeCodex

Mode-aware writing critic. Distilled from Rachel Konrad's Stanford GSB "Winning Writing" course (spring 2026), the 10 rules of cold outreach, Heidi Roizen's mailing rules, and live class critiques. Loads a rule catalog (rules/catalog.json) and a mode definition (rules/modes.json) at invocation. Use whenever drafting…

kalyvask/winning-writing

Skill Claude CodeCodex

Reorganizes a memo, email, status update, or report so the bottom line is up front. Implements Kramon's BLUF (Bottom Line Up Front) rule. Use when a draft buries the lede, opens with context instead of conclusion, or builds up to the point with "organ music." Triggers on "BLUF," "lede," "buried," "memo," "status…

kalyvask/winning-writing

Skill Claude CodeCodex

Cuts a draft to a target word count without losing substance. Two modes behind one skill. target-count hits a specific number (200 for a cold email, 500 for an op-ed, 6 for a product summary). redundancy catches the specific failure where a phrase says what the verb or context already implied — "going forward" after a…

kalyvask/winning-writing

Skill Claude CodeCodex

Rewrites blunt downward or peer feedback as "what I like plus what I would like," focused on the work rather than the person, ideally phrased as a question. Use whenever the user is drafting a performance review, a Slack message to a report, a 1:1 talking point, an HR conversation script, a peer-review comment, or any…

kalyvask/winning-writing

Skill Claude CodeCodex

Finds the unexpected, dry, or self-deprecating angle that makes an email memorable. Turns "professional and polite" into "this person sounds like a real human." Use when a draft is technically correct but forgettable, when the user wants humor without slapstick, or when they need a subject line or sign-off with…

kalyvask/winning-writing

Skill Claude CodeCodex

Rewrites section titles, slide titles, op-ed headlines, email subject lines, and chapter headings from category labels into bold arguable claims. Implements Constine's "punchy slide titles that tell the story" rule and Kingsbury's NYT Opinion guidance that headlines should make a bold claim, not a neutral description.…

kalyvask/winning-writing

Skill Claude CodeCodex

Cuts cinematic details that don't serve the main point. The opposite move from vividness. Vividness adds sensory detail; this skill removes detail that's vivid but distracts from the argument. Use when a narrative paragraph has impressive sensory texture (sounds, colors, weather, mechanics of an unrelated scene) that…

kalyvask/winning-writing

Skill Claude CodeCodex

Diagnoses drafts that tell three half-stories instead of one full story, and rewrites them around the single strongest narrative thread. Implements Konrad's rule 7 and Adam Bryant's "stay in your lane" advice — distinct from compression (which cuts words) because pick-a-lane cuts whole stories. Use when a bio, cold…

kalyvask/winning-writing

Skill Claude CodeCodex

Scrubs the three surface tells that make prose feel AI-generated, padded, or jargon-heavy. Three targets behind one skill, picked via the --target arg. em-dashes (default off in cold email / memo / Slack, max one per page in op-eds), adverbs (the -ly and intensifier pile), jargon (the Silicon Valley / consultant…

kalyvask/winning-writing

Skill Claude CodeCodex

Cuts opening sentences that recap what the recipient already knows about themselves, their company, or their own work. Implements Konrad's rule 2 ("begin with something they don't know — tell me a secret about the future") and Kramon's rule 4. Use when a draft opens with flattery, a summary of the reader's…

kalyvask/winning-writing

Skill Claude CodeCodex

Pushes a draft from abstract toward concrete at two scales. Noun-level (replaces "dog" with "German shepherd," "customer" with "Sarah at JPMorgan's options-trading desk," "many" with "47 of 100") and scene-level (turns "I was angry" into the body signal, room, and dialogue). Implements Kramon's "specific over…

kalyvask/winning-writing

Skill Claude CodeCodex

Audits a draft on Susan Fiske's two-axis model of social judgment — warmth (do I like and trust this person?) and competence (do I respect this person?) — and rewrites the lines that signal the wrong thing on either axis. Implements Kramon's hardest rule: "show competence AND warmth in a single sentence." Use when a…

kalyvask/winning-writing

Skill Claude CodeCodex

Drafts and critiques cold emails using Rachel Konrad's 10 rules, Heidi Roizen's mailing rules, and Danny Hertzberg's six elements. Use whenever the user is writing a cold email, LinkedIn DM, intro request, hiring-manager outreach, VC pitch email, or any unsolicited message to someone with more power than them.…

kalyvask/winning-writing

Skill Claude CodeCodex

Finds specific, genuine "like you" hooks between the writer and a cold-outreach target — the bridges that turn a generic email into one that feels hand-written. Takes the recipient dossier and the writer's profile (about-me.md) and surfaces ranked angles. Use after recipient-research is done, before drafting. Triggers…

kalyvask/winning-writing

Skill Claude CodeCodex

Independent second-model gate for cold emails before send. Must run on a DIFFERENT model than the one that drafted (e.g., draft on Opus, review on Sonnet — or vice versa). Acts as a binary pass/fail gate, not a regrade or rewrite. Names the specific failure mode from a 14-mode catalog (strategy / personalization /…

kalyvask/winning-writing

Skill Claude CodeCodex

Drafts and reviews answers to reporter questions, on-the-record statements, crisis-comms responses, and press-inquiry replies. Implements Andrew Ross Sorkin's 11 rules (taught with Kramon at Stanford GSB) plus AP attribution definitions for off-the-record / background / deep background conversations. Use when a…

kalyvask/winning-writing

Skill Claude CodeCodex

Verifies every checkable claim in a draft before it goes out — numbers, names, titles, dates, quotes, company facts, and citations. Separates what was verified from what could not be checked from what is wrong, and never lets an unverifiable claim pass as verified. Use before sending anything with a number or a named…

kalyvask/winning-writing

Skill Claude CodeCodex

Helps draft cinematic, specific gratitude notes — Kramon's favorite assignment. Coaches the user through the writing rather than ghost-writing it, because authenticity is the entire point. Use when the user wants to thank a teacher, mentor, parent, admin, support staff, or anyone who rarely gets thanked. Triggers on…

kalyvask/winning-writing

Skill Claude CodeCodex

When pitching an idea, researches the graveyard — companies that tried something similar in the past 5–25 years and failed, what specifically killed them, and which operators or investors lived through those failures and would be valuable to talk to. Use before pitching to a VC, a customer, or a hiring manager — the…

kalyvask/winning-writing

Skill Claude CodeCodex

Makes a draft read like a real human typed it — adds asymmetry, light contractions, and (rarely) one safe typo. Use only when a draft is technically correct but reads polished beyond plausibility, when the user wants to "rough it up," "make it more human," or "less AI-clean." Does NOT run on high-stakes writing (see…

kalyvask/winning-writing

Skill Claude CodeCodex

Drafts and critiques op-eds, opinion pieces, and LinkedIn long-form posts using Glenn Kramon's framework, Katie Kingsbury's NYT Opinion guidance, and Nicholas Kristof's storytelling rules. Use when the user is writing an op-ed, an opinion piece, a Substack essay, a LinkedIn long-form post, or pitching one to a…

kalyvask/winning-writing

Skill Claude CodeCodex

Drafts and critiques performance reviews using Glenn Kramon's seven rules from Stanford GSB's Winning Writing course. Use when the user is writing an annual review, mid-year check-in, self-review, 360 feedback, peer review, or any written feedback for an employee, boss, partner, or themselves. Triggers on phrases like…