A literature-review workflow that combines evidence from the full text of selected research papers into a findings document. It uses different review methods for systematic, semi-systematic, and integrative reviews.
A workflow for turning source material, such as a textbook or research method, into a usable skill for an AI coding assistant. It filters and structures the material, drafts the skill, checks its rules and output format, and reviews it before saving.
An automated literature-review search and screening workflow using OpenAlex, an open database and API for scholarly research, and Zotero, a reference manager.
An academic topic-development workflow in Chinese for creating a new concept around a phenomenon that existing theories do not name well. It guides users through finding, checking, and presenting a research topic, with support for resuming at later stages.
A research-topic coaching workflow for finding a study question where a new method or dataset addresses a known limitation. It guides you through idea discovery, narrowing, and writing research aims and a methods plan.
A Chinese-language method for structuring an existing research idea into four parts: theory, phenomenon, context, and contribution, plus research questions.
A three-stage coaching workflow for choosing a topic for an integrative review, a research paper that combines and critiques findings from different studies to build a broader framework. It guides the researcher from defining the topic to producing a review plan.
A three-stage coaching workflow for choosing a topic for a semi-systematic or narrative literature review, which explains and connects research across a broad area instead of using a fully exhaustive search.
A three-stage coaching workflow for choosing a focused systematic review topic. A systematic review is a structured study that finds and evaluates existing research using stated rules.
A Chinese-language workflow for developing research topics that explain a phenomenon through an academic theory, using qualitative or critical approaches.
A Chinese-language workflow for developing an academic research topic. It first sorts the project by article type and research approach, then sends it to the matching workflow.
A tool that extracts a journal's actual submission requirements and turns them into a traceable requirements matrix. A requirements matrix records each rule, its scope, whether it is mandatory or suggested, and any gap.
A manuscript-diagnosis skill for assessing an academic paper’s initial draft, scope, sources, required inputs, and next actions. The available description does not specify its detailed assessment criteria.
A workflow for revising humanities and social-science manuscripts from an approved list of issues. It preserves the main argument, records each change and unfinished item, and produces a draft for the author to confirm.
A planning workflow for replying to editor and reviewer comments on an academic paper. It preserves the original comments, gives each point an ID, identifies needed evidence, and records the author’s decision for each response.
A workflow for carrying out approved responses to peer-review comments and then writing a point-by-point reply from the actual revised manuscript. It checks each comment against the change, its location, and any unfinished work.
A workflow for assembling a journal submission package from an author-approved manuscript, a table of journal requirements, and verified statement facts. It can prepare the paper, cover letter, checklist, and revision package while recording missing information.
A task-intake workflow for academic paper submissions, revisions, and responses to reviewers. It checks the project, anonymous-task status, file versions, and what the author has approved.
★not rated 9 2d agoA49 tokens
At most 3 mods per repository are shown here, and a mod shipped inside a plugin is left to that plugin's page — the rest are on their repository pages: