code-review
01Command
Three-axis review (Spec / Standards / Risk) of the diff between HEAD and a fixed point, via parallel subagents.
Command
Three-axis review (Spec / Standards / Risk) of the diff between HEAD and a fixed point, via parallel subagents.
Command
Run the full feature delivery pipeline — Planning → Implement → Review → QA — with approval gates; resumes from existing artifacts.
Command
Explain a topic like the reader is five years old, using simple English.
Command
Stage 7 of /development-workflow — holistic review of the whole feature diff against Product/Technical/Contract Specs.
Command
Global multi-agent orchestrator — advisor (second opinion), committee (two contrasting agents plan), handoff (transfer a task), or loop (worker/verifier until done).
Command
Adopt a job-role persona — Compass (PM), Forge (backend), Prism (frontend), Gauntlet (QA), Bastion (security), Atlas (DevOps) — with its principles and a thinking level (L1 pragmatic → L4 perfection at scale).
Command
Stage 3 of /development-workflow — contract-spec.md (REST/gRPC/Event contracts) from a Technical Spec.
Command
Stage 6 of /development-workflow — execute approved tasks.md with tests, per-task reviewer PASS, and checkpoint gates.
Command
Stage 1 of /development-workflow — UX-centric Product Spec from a feature idea, user problem, or goal.
Command
Stage 5 of /development-workflow — final planning gate; generates tasks.md only when no Blocking/High issues remain.
Command
Stage 2 of /development-workflow — implementation-ready Technical Spec from a Product Spec.
Command
Stage 4 of /development-workflow — skeptical review of Product/Technical/Contract Specs with severity-ranked findings.
Command
Stage P2 of /product-workflow (optional) — research for one decision: use the products of competitors, read their reviews, read why deals were won or lost, find what comes next.
Command
Stage P1 of /product-workflow — talk to users, write what they said, and map their problems to possible solutions.
Command
Stages P6 and P7 of /product-workflow — set the main number, the weekly numbers, the early signal, and the things that must not become worse. Then record the real numbers after launch.
Command
Skeptical review of one PRD before publish or build — find the gaps and the parts that do not belong, then close each one by asking the user question by question.
Command
Stage P5 of /product-workflow — write the PRD: introduction with 5W1H, success metrics, user stories, and a requirements table with acceptance criteria. Then give it to /development-workflow.
Command
Stage P4 of /product-workflow — score the problems or the possible solutions, give a source for each number, and make a Now / Next / Later roadmap with no dates.
Command
Publish the PRD from the current session to Confluence — quality gate against the PRD template, Q&A for the space and parent page with remembered defaults, PIC mentions on open questions and assumptions, then create the page.
Command
Stage P3 of /product-workflow — list the assumptions, find the one that can stop the idea, and test it against a number that you write before the test.
Command
Run the product loop — learn the problem, research, test the risks, select what to build, write the PRD, set the numbers, build, measure, then start again. Simple English, for all persons.
Command
Stage 8 of /development-workflow — QA acceptance testing of the implemented feature against the Product Spec.
Command
Quiz the user on a topic (or on this session's unresolved topics) at eli5, medium, or comprehensive level.
Command
Run a feature retrospective — review lessons one by one and, with permission, write each into the right spec, skill, constitution, or memory file.