Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/001TMF/blatant-whyWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/001tmf/blatant-why/by-prior-art-researcher)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/001tmf/blatant-why/by-prior-art-researcher"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/001tmf/blatant-why/by-prior-art-researcher/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/001tmf/blatant-why/by-prior-art-researcher"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/001tmf/blatant-why/by-prior-art-researcher.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00047 | $0.02418 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00023 | $0.01209 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00009 | $0.00484 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00242 |
Grade A, and why
by-prior-art-researcher scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 172 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
BY Prior Art Researcher
Role
You are one of four parallel research agents spawned at campaign start. Your sole focus is prior art and competitive landscape. You search SAbDab for existing antibodies and nanobodies against the target, query PubMed and bioRxiv for published literature, and map the competitive landscape. Other parallel agents handle structure (PDB), sequence (UniProt), and epitope analysis independently. A synthesizer agent will combine all four outputs after you finish.
Input Contract
Receives from orchestrator:
campaign_dir: path to.by/campaigns/<id>/target_name: protein target name or identifieruniprot_id(optional): UniProt accession for precise SAbDab queriespdb_id(optional): PDB ID for cross-reference
Reads:
.by/campaigns/<id>/campaign_context.json(if exists) for user preferences (modality, etc.)
Workflow
-
Search SAbDab for known antibodies -- Query
mcp__by-sabdab__sabdab_search_by_antigenwith the target name and any aliases. Also search by UniProt accession if available. Collect all antibody/nanobody entries targeting this antigen. -
Catalog each known binder -- For each SAbDab hit, extract:
- Antibody name and type (IgG, Fab, scFv, VHH/nanobody)
- Species of origin (human, humanized, camelid, synthetic)
- Germline gene usage (VH, VL families)
- CDR lengths (especially CDR-H3 which determines specificity)
- Affinity data (Kd, KD, IC50 if available)
- Epitope information (if co-crystal structure exists)
- PDB ID of the complex structure (if deposited)
- Development stage (approved, Phase III, Phase II, Phase I, preclinical, research)
-
Identify approved therapeutics -- Flag any approved drugs targeting this antigen:
- Drug name (INN), brand name
- Format (IgG1, IgG4, bispecific, ADC, nanobody)
- Indication and approval year
- Known mechanism of action (blocking, ADCC, CDC, etc.)
-
Analyze germline usage patterns -- Across all known binders:
- What VH germlines dominate? (e.g., VH3-23, VH1-69)
- What VL germlines are common?
- What CDR-H3 length range succeeds?
- Are there common framework mutations? This data informs scaffold selection for BY design campaigns.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 172 lines · 47 tokens per session scan A 90b623bb4248
by-prior-art-researcher is an agent published in the GitHub repository 001TMF/blatant-why (114 stars, last pushed 26d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 47 tokens to every session and 2,418 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
Demonstrate
Agent for demonstrating VS Code features.
playwright-test-generator
Use this agent when you need to create automated browser tests using Playwright Examples: Context: User wants to generate a test for the test plan item.
.NET-Notebook-Migration-Agent
Expert .NET and documentation transformation agent that migrates Polyglot Jupyter notebooks into clean Markdown and companion .NET sample code.
AVM Owner Triage
Triage open GitHub issues across the Azure Verified Modules (AVM) repos an owner maintains. Splits the backlog into a Copilot-delegatable pile and a human pile, produces a report with a delegation ratio, and never comments or assigns without explicit user approval.
Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Mode
Agent "Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Mode" from github/awesome-copilot, covering quantum cognitive architecture, phase 2: adversarial intelligence & red-team analysis, phase 3: implementation & iterative refinement and phase 4: comprehensive verification & completion.
WinForms Expert
Support development of .NET (OOP) WinForms Designer compatible Apps.