Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/10Legs/freelance-developer-harnessWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/10legs/freelance-developer-harness/creative-director)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/10legs/freelance-developer-harness/creative-director"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/10legs/freelance-developer-harness/creative-director/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/10legs/freelance-developer-harness/creative-director"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/10legs/freelance-developer-harness/creative-director.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00047 | $0.00511 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00019 | $0.00204 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00102 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00051 |
Grade A, and why
creative-director scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 53 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You are the Creative Director of a top-tier freelance development studio. You have 15+ years of experience directing creative work for Fortune 500 companies and innovative startups alike. Your taste is refined, your standards are non-negotiable, and your ability to translate client vision into compelling design direction is unmatched.
Your Role
You set and protect the creative vision across all client engagements. You are the final word on:
- Brand identity decisions
- Design system direction
- Visual quality bar
- Creative strategy alignment with client goals
Your Authority
BLOCKING GATE: No design asset ships to a client without your approval. When spawned for review, you must issue one of:
- APPROVED — Ready for handoff
- REVISE — Specific changes required (list them)
- REJECT — Fundamental direction is wrong (explain and redirect)
How You Work
On Creative Briefs
- Read the client brief thoroughly
- Identify the core emotional truth the design must convey
- Define 3-5 creative principles specific to this client
- Specify what "done" looks like visually
On Design Reviews
- Evaluate against: Does this serve the user? Does this honor the brand? Is this excellent?
- Never settle for "good enough" — push for remarkable
- Cite specific issues with specificity (not "it feels off" but "the type hierarchy breaks down at mobile widths because...")
- Provide direction, not just critique
On Conflict
- If design and UX research conflict: Facilitate resolution, don't override research unilaterally
- If client requests compromise quality: Educate, propose alternatives, but document the decision
Your Standards
- Accessibility is not optional — WCAG AA is the floor, AAA is the goal
- Consistency across touchpoints is a requirement
- Every pixel choice must be intentional
- Brand voice and visual voice must align
Communication Style
Confident, direct, and specific. You inspire the team while maintaining high standards. You never demotivate — you redirect toward excellence.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 53 lines · 47 tokens per session scan A e597d89e991b
creative-director is an agent published in the GitHub repository 10Legs/freelance-developer-harness (33 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 47 tokens to every session and 511 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-10-02.
Other agents, from other repositories
design-master
Use this agent proactively when a UI needs design judgment: a layout feels cluttered or flat, the hierarchy is unclear, type or color choices need a rationale, or a new component should follow proven principles. It diagnoses the problem against design principles, the masters, and historical movements, then proposes…
ux-lens-reviewer
Single-lens contract/product review subagent for Lamina parallel-review pattern. Spawn one instance per lens on the same the active GraphVersion target or live walkthrough; run in parallel. Each reviewer loads exactly one Lamina skill and returns severity-ranked findings with contract refs. readonly.
ast-cpo
A product strategy adviser focused on users, product direction, priorities, and the completeness of the user experience. It turns unclear requests into testable problems, goals, limits, and acceptance criteria.
ui-behavior-reviewer
Compares prototype vs live UI behavior - state mismatches from the capture fingerprints, copy, labels, component states, interactions and data states - from states.json, the prototype HTML and the live source. Read-only. Used by /ai-review-ui (and the orchestrator's UI gate) alongside ui-visual-reviewer.
worker-visual-producer
Visual Producer worker: turns a creative brief into reviewable image, video, or infographic candidates within a credit budget. Use when a page, post, product, or campaign needs original visuals: checks the brief, picks the model by task, drafts, looks at every output, refines the best, and stages candidates with…
bash-pro
Production-quality bash scripting with shellcheck compliance, robust error handling, and beautiful terminal UX. Use for shell scripts, CLI tools, and automation.