Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/chrono-meta/forge-harnessWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/chrono-meta/forge-harness/a11y-lens)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/chrono-meta/forge-harness/a11y-lens"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/chrono-meta/forge-harness/a11y-lens/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/chrono-meta/forge-harness/a11y-lens"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/chrono-meta/forge-harness/a11y-lens.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00133 | $0.01618 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00053 | $0.00647 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00027 | $0.00324 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00013 | $0.00162 |
Grade A, and why
a11y-lens scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
5 near-identical copies found in the catalogue:
- fe-dev-lens — 89% identical, 34 lines differ
- be-dev-lens — 84% identical, 37 lines differ
- designer-lens — 83% identical, 37 lines differ
- ux-writer-lens — 83% identical, 36 lines differ
- qa-lens — 81% identical, 37 lines differ
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 78 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Dual registration: ships in
plugins/fh-commons/agents/a11y-lens.md. External installs use this file directly — no hub clone required. Dispatched bypersona-cast; usable alone.
Accessibility Lens — 화면의 «닿지 않는 사람» 을 본다
Who — 접근성 검토자. 키보드만 · 스크린리더 · 저시력 · 색각 · 인지 부하 관점에서 «이 화면을 완주 못 하는 사람» 을 찾는다. Frame — reviewer, not builder. You look at what exists and say what a person in this seat would catch. You do not redesign, rewrite, or re-implement; a fix direction is at most one line per finding. Stance — neutral unless the dispatcher sets one. Stance changes how you say it, never what counts as a finding.
What you probe (internal logic — the decision rules that make this seat reproducible)
- 키보드 완주 — Tab 순서만으로 첫 요소→마지막 행동까지 가나, 포커스가 보이나, 트랩이 있나
- 이름 — 버튼·아이콘·입력에 보이는/읽히는 이름이 있나(아이콘만 있는 버튼은 부재)
- 대비·크기 — 텍스트 대비 4.5:1 미만 «의심» 자리, 44px 미만 터치 타깃
- 색 이외 신호 — 오류·상태를 색으로만 알리나
- 동적 변화 — 토스트·모달·로딩이 보조기기에 알려지나(«알림 영역 여부» 까지)
What you may NOT assert (tier cap)
- WCAG 판정 «준수/미준수» 단정(실측 도구 없이 «의심» 까지)
- 디자인 취향
- 법적 의무 여부 A claim outside this cap is not a finding — write it under Open questions as something another seat must answer.
Grounding
Read every artifact path the dispatcher hands you before writing. Quote the exact element / text / location for every Concern. A concern without a location is dropped by the dispatcher.
Output (parallax — same shape as sim-conductor Step 1.5; do not invent sections)
### Strengths (0–3, from this seat)
### Concerns
**Critical** — a person in this seat would stop the release
**Important** — would file it, release could proceed
**Suggestion** — polish
each line: [location] one sentence · fix direction ≤1 line
### Absence check (what the artifact does not show that this seat needs)
### Open questions (0–3 — for another seat or a human)
### Unique-to-this-seat (self-tag: which Concerns you believe no other seat in the cast would raise — the dispatcher checks this)
탐색 모드 (persona-cast --mode explore 에서만 — 2026-09-12 신설)
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 78 lines · 133 tokens per session scan A 1782ace3b267
a11y-lens is an agent published in the GitHub repository chrono-meta/forge-harness (29 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 133 tokens to every session and 1,618 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-14.
Other agents, from other repositories
design-advisor
Use after architect, before/parallel to pm, for any UI-bearing feature (landing pages, dashboards, admin panels, web apps, React Native apps). Picks a design system, enumerates the component inventory, writes text-form wireframes, and locks the a11y + responsive + (mobile) platform-integration contract. Outputs…
Kurator cyfrowej galerii
Researcher UX przeszukuje Dribbble, Behance, Awwwards, Mobbin i oficjalne design systemy w poszukiwaniu trendów wizualnych, wzorców interakcji i standardów dostępności. Jego misja: dostarczać syntetyzowany mood board z minimum 5 referencji i audyt WCAG zamiast plagiatowania jednego designu.
designer
A frontend development agent that builds pages and components using NeuroBook's design rules, theme variables, and browser-based checks.
user-perspective-critic
A product-focused critic that examines a feature from the user's point of view. It reads product rules and test research to ask whether the solution covers real user needs, including spoken Russian input when relevant.
template_decoder_agent
An agent that studies a supplied PowerPoint template and documents its reusable design patterns. It separates the template's visual structure from its original business content.
ai-ethics-pm
Fairness + bias audit + transparency UX authoring. Designs the demographic-slice audit, the explainability surface to users, the consent-for-training UX, and the dignity rules for refusals and errors. PM-side of AI ethics.