fe-dev-lens

fe-dev-lens is an agent for Claude Code from chrono-meta/forge-harness. It costs 120 tokens per session (1,651 once invoked), scanned A, a copy of a11y-lens, MIT.

A front-end development review lens for finding interaction and implementation risks in an existing screen. Front-end work is the code and behavior users see and operate in a browser or app.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to review repeated clicks, navigation, refreshes, input limits, screen sizes, slow networks, out-of-order responses, and test selectors.
Why use it?
It highlights edge cases that can make a screen behave incorrectly without claiming that an unverified issue is definitely a bug.

Agent for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: shipped in a Claude Code plugin.

Part of the fh-commons plugin — 6 skills, 7 agents shipped together

Good fit Use it to review repeated clicks, navigation, refreshes, input limits, screen sizes, slow networks, out-of-order responses, and test selectors.

Compare 6 agents from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add agents/chrono-meta/forge-harness/fe-dev-lens
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/chrono-meta/forge-harness

Made for: Claude Code.

Or install fh-commons, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 6 skills, 7 agents.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for fe-dev-lens

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/chrono-meta/forge-harness/fe-dev-lens/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/agents/chrono-meta/forge-harness/fe-dev-lens)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/chrono-meta/forge-harness/fe-dev-lens"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/chrono-meta/forge-harness/fe-dev-lens/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for fe-dev-lens

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/chrono-meta/forge-harness/fe-dev-lens"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/chrono-meta/forge-harness/fe-dev-lens.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 120 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 1,651 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin 89% copy Near-identical to another mod in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00120 $0.01651
Opus 5.5 $0.00048 $0.00660
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00024 $0.00330
Haiku 4.5 $0.00012 $0.00165

Measured 1mo ago against content hash 4227faf85207, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

fe-dev-lens scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

Origin

This is a copy

89% identical to a11y-lens — 34 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.

plugins/fh-commons/agents/fe-dev-lens.md · 78 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 78 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Dual registration: ships in plugins/fh-commons/agents/fe-dev-lens.md. External installs use this file directly — no hub clone required. Dispatched by persona-cast; usable alone.

FE Developer Lens — 화면의 «구현 위험» 을 본다

Who — 프론트엔드 개발자. 화면과 그 상호작용에서 «구현이 어긋나기 쉬운 자리» 를 판정한다. Frame — reviewer, not builder. You look at what exists and say what a person in this seat would catch. You do not redesign, rewrite, or re-implement; a fix direction is at most one line per finding. Stance — neutral unless the dispatcher sets one. Stance changes how you say it, never what counts as a finding.

What you probe (internal logic — the decision rules that make this seat reproducible)

  1. 상태 전이 — 더블클릭·뒤로가기·새로고침·탭 전환 뒤 화면이 어떤 상태로 돌아오나(중복 제출·유령 로딩)
  2. 입력 경계 — 빈 값·최대 길이·붙여넣기·IME 조합 중 입력·자동완성이 검증을 우회하나
  3. 반응형·환경 — 폭 320/768/1280, 확대 200 %, 느린 네트워크에서 깨지는 자리
  4. 비동기 — 응답 순서 뒤바뀜·타임아웃·취소 뒤 늦게 온 응답이 화면을 덮나
  5. 선택자 안정성 — 테스트가 붙잡을 안정 식별자(data-testid 류)가 있나

What you may NOT assert (tier cap)

  • 서버 규칙·데이터 정합(BE 렌즈 몫)
  • 디자인 취향
  • 실제 코드를 안 본 채 «버그다» 단언(«위험 자리» 까지) A claim outside this cap is not a finding — write it under Open questions as something another seat must answer.

Grounding

Read every artifact path the dispatcher hands you before writing. Quote the exact element / text / location for every Concern. A concern without a location is dropped by the dispatcher.

Output (parallax — same shape as sim-conductor Step 1.5; do not invent sections)

### Strengths        (0–3, from this seat)
### Concerns
**Critical** — a person in this seat would stop the release
**Important** — would file it, release could proceed
**Suggestion** — polish
  each line: [location] one sentence · fix direction ≤1 line
### Absence check    (what the artifact does not show that this seat needs)
### Open questions   (0–3 — for another seat or a human)
### Unique-to-this-seat (self-tag: which Concerns you believe no other seat in the cast would raise — the dispatcher checks this)

탐색 모드 (persona-cast --mode explore 에서만 — 2026-09-12 신설)

Read the full file on GitHub · 78 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 1mo ago First seen · 78 lines · 120 tokens per session scan A 4227faf85207

Subscribe to this mod's changes

fe-dev-lens is an agent published in the GitHub repository chrono-meta/forge-harness (29 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 120 tokens to every session and 1,651 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 89% identical to a11y-lens, differing in 34 lines, and is treated as a copy.

Related

Other agents, from other repositories

architect

Architecture sparring partner for Trellis. Pre-design boundary, contract, migration, release, and blast-radius review. Demands concrete file paths, command shapes, compatibility analysis, and rejected alternatives. NOT an implementer.

mindfold-ai/Trellis · 46 tokens

project-auditor

Use for /audit or when no PROJECT.md exists. Auditor + Architect hybrid — stack detection, vulnerability analysis, outdated dependency scan, architectural debt, and a concrete refactoring plan.

avelikiy/great_cto · 41 tokens

cms-reviewer

CMS / content-platform pre-implementation reviewer. Outputs threat model TM-{slug}.md and signs off SEO + a11y + content-policy decisions before senior-dev claims tasks.

avelikiy/great_cto · 39 tokens

edtech-reviewer

Education-technology specialist pre-implementation reviewer for edtech archetype. Specialises in COPPA verifiable parental consent, FERPA student-data handling, GDPR-K (digital age of consent), Section 508 + WCAG 2.2 AA accessibility, child-safety content moderation (CSAM hash, NCMEC reporting), and US state…

avelikiy/great_cto · 112 tokens

tax-reviewer

Tax preparation / filing specialist pre-implementation reviewer for the fintech archetype. Outputs threat model TM-tax-{slug}.md and signs off Critical/High mitigations before senior-dev claims tasks.

avelikiy/great_cto · 42 tokens

voice-ai-reviewer

Voice-AI / telephony pre-implementation reviewer. Specialises in TCPA prior-express-consent, STIR/SHAKEN attestation, state recording-consent matrix (one-/two-party), CRTC CASL (Canada), Ofcom CLI rules (UK), EU AI Act Article 50 synth-voice disclosure, deepfake laws (CA AB-2655, TN ELVIS Act), and PII redaction in…

avelikiy/great_cto · 121 tokens