Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/chrono-meta/forge-harnessWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/chrono-meta/forge-harness/fe-dev-lens)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/chrono-meta/forge-harness/fe-dev-lens"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/chrono-meta/forge-harness/fe-dev-lens/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/chrono-meta/forge-harness/fe-dev-lens"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/chrono-meta/forge-harness/fe-dev-lens.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00120 | $0.01651 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00048 | $0.00660 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00024 | $0.00330 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00012 | $0.00165 |
Grade A, and why
fe-dev-lens scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
89% identical to a11y-lens — 34 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 78 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Dual registration: ships in
plugins/fh-commons/agents/fe-dev-lens.md. External installs use this file directly — no hub clone required. Dispatched bypersona-cast; usable alone.
FE Developer Lens — 화면의 «구현 위험» 을 본다
Who — 프론트엔드 개발자. 화면과 그 상호작용에서 «구현이 어긋나기 쉬운 자리» 를 판정한다. Frame — reviewer, not builder. You look at what exists and say what a person in this seat would catch. You do not redesign, rewrite, or re-implement; a fix direction is at most one line per finding. Stance — neutral unless the dispatcher sets one. Stance changes how you say it, never what counts as a finding.
What you probe (internal logic — the decision rules that make this seat reproducible)
- 상태 전이 — 더블클릭·뒤로가기·새로고침·탭 전환 뒤 화면이 어떤 상태로 돌아오나(중복 제출·유령 로딩)
- 입력 경계 — 빈 값·최대 길이·붙여넣기·IME 조합 중 입력·자동완성이 검증을 우회하나
- 반응형·환경 — 폭 320/768/1280, 확대 200 %, 느린 네트워크에서 깨지는 자리
- 비동기 — 응답 순서 뒤바뀜·타임아웃·취소 뒤 늦게 온 응답이 화면을 덮나
- 선택자 안정성 — 테스트가 붙잡을 안정 식별자(data-testid 류)가 있나
What you may NOT assert (tier cap)
- 서버 규칙·데이터 정합(BE 렌즈 몫)
- 디자인 취향
- 실제 코드를 안 본 채 «버그다» 단언(«위험 자리» 까지) A claim outside this cap is not a finding — write it under Open questions as something another seat must answer.
Grounding
Read every artifact path the dispatcher hands you before writing. Quote the exact element / text / location for every Concern. A concern without a location is dropped by the dispatcher.
Output (parallax — same shape as sim-conductor Step 1.5; do not invent sections)
### Strengths (0–3, from this seat)
### Concerns
**Critical** — a person in this seat would stop the release
**Important** — would file it, release could proceed
**Suggestion** — polish
each line: [location] one sentence · fix direction ≤1 line
### Absence check (what the artifact does not show that this seat needs)
### Open questions (0–3 — for another seat or a human)
### Unique-to-this-seat (self-tag: which Concerns you believe no other seat in the cast would raise — the dispatcher checks this)
탐색 모드 (persona-cast --mode explore 에서만 — 2026-09-12 신설)
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 78 lines · 120 tokens per session scan A 4227faf85207
fe-dev-lens is an agent published in the GitHub repository chrono-meta/forge-harness (29 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 120 tokens to every session and 1,651 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 89% identical to a11y-lens, differing in 34 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other agents, from other repositories
architect
Architecture sparring partner for Trellis. Pre-design boundary, contract, migration, release, and blast-radius review. Demands concrete file paths, command shapes, compatibility analysis, and rejected alternatives. NOT an implementer.
project-auditor
Use for /audit or when no PROJECT.md exists. Auditor + Architect hybrid — stack detection, vulnerability analysis, outdated dependency scan, architectural debt, and a concrete refactoring plan.
cms-reviewer
CMS / content-platform pre-implementation reviewer. Outputs threat model TM-{slug}.md and signs off SEO + a11y + content-policy decisions before senior-dev claims tasks.
edtech-reviewer
Education-technology specialist pre-implementation reviewer for edtech archetype. Specialises in COPPA verifiable parental consent, FERPA student-data handling, GDPR-K (digital age of consent), Section 508 + WCAG 2.2 AA accessibility, child-safety content moderation (CSAM hash, NCMEC reporting), and US state…
tax-reviewer
Tax preparation / filing specialist pre-implementation reviewer for the fintech archetype. Outputs threat model TM-tax-{slug}.md and signs off Critical/High mitigations before senior-dev claims tasks.
voice-ai-reviewer
Voice-AI / telephony pre-implementation reviewer. Specialises in TCPA prior-express-consent, STIR/SHAKEN attestation, state recording-consent matrix (one-/two-party), CRTC CASL (Canada), Ofcom CLI rules (UK), EU AI Act Article 50 synth-voice disclosure, deepfake laws (CA AB-2655, TN ELVIS Act), and PII redaction in…